Impact of digital technology as reliable source of input for rational decision making is debatable issue. Critically evaluate with suitable example.
Impact of digital technology as reliable source of input for rational decision making is debatable issue. Critically evaluate with suitable example.
Digital technologies offer unprecedented access to information, potentially revolutionizing decision-making. However, their reliability as a sole input for rational choices is a complex issue demanding careful evaluation. This necessitates a balanced approach, acknowledging both the empowering potential and inherent limitations of these tools.
Enhanced Information Access
Digital platforms democratize knowledge, offering diverse perspectives crucial for informed decisions. This aligns with Rawls's theory of justice, emphasizing fairness and equal access to opportunity.
- Wider reach of information: Government websites provide details on policies, fostering transparency and citizen engagement. Example: MyGov.in facilitates citizen participation in policy discussions.
- Real-time data availability: Platforms like Google Maps offer real-time traffic updates, enabling efficient route planning. Example: Waze uses crowdsourced data to provide real-time traffic and hazard information.
- Diverse perspectives: Online forums and social media platforms offer diverse viewpoints on social and political issues. Example: Twitter provides a platform for public discourse on current events.
Challenges of Digital Reliance
Over-reliance on digital inputs can hinder rational decision-making due to inherent biases and limitations. This resonates with Aristotle's virtue ethics, emphasizing the importance of practical wisdom and critical thinking.
- Algorithmic bias: Algorithms can perpetuate existing societal biases, leading to discriminatory outcomes. Example: Facial recognition software has shown bias in identifying individuals of different ethnicities, as highlighted in a 2019 study by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
- Misinformation: The rapid spread of misinformation online can distort perceptions and influence decisions. Example: The spread of false information regarding COVID-19 vaccines on social media platforms led to vaccine hesitancy.
- Echo chambers: Online echo chambers reinforce pre-existing beliefs, limiting exposure to alternative perspectives. Example: Facebook's algorithm tends to show users content that aligns with their existing views, creating filter bubbles.
In conclusion, while digital technologies offer valuable tools for informed decision-making, their limitations necessitate a cautious approach. Integrating human judgment, critical thinking, and robust data governance frameworks is crucial for leveraging these tools effectively in Indian governance and policy formulation.
Answer Length
Model answers may exceed the word limit for better clarity and depth. Use them as a guide, but always frame your final answer within the exam’s prescribed limit.
In just 60 sec
Evaluate your handwritten answer
- Get detailed feedback
- Model Answer after evaluation
Crack UPSC with your
Personal AI Mentor
An AI-powered ecosystem to learn, practice, and evaluate with discipline
Start Now