In a modern democratic polity, there is a concept of the political executive and permanent executive elected people’s representatives form the political executive, and bureaucracy forms the permanent executive. Ministers frame policy decisions and bureaucrats execute these. In the initial decades after independence, the relationship between the permanent executives and the political executives was characterized by mutual understanding, respect, and cooperation, without encroaching upon each other’s domain.
However, in subsequent decades, the situation has changed. There are instances of the political executive insisting upon the permanent executives to follow its agenda. Respect for and appreciation of upright bureaucrats has declined. There is an increasing tendency among the political executive to get involved in routine administrative matters such as transfers, posting, etc. Under this scenario, there is a definitive trend towards the ‘politicization of bureaucracy’. The rising materialism and acquisitiveness in social life have also adversely impacted upon the ethical values of both the permanent executive and the political executive.
What are the consequences of this ‘politicization of bureaucracy? Discuss. (250 words) (20 marks)
In a modern democratic polity, there is a concept of the political executive and permanent executive elected people’s representatives form the political executive, and bureaucracy forms the permanent executive. Ministers frame policy decisions and bureaucrats execute these. In the initial decades after independence, the relationship between the permanent executives and the political executives was characterized by mutual understanding, respect, and cooperation, without encroaching upon each other’s domain.
However, in subsequent decades, the situation has changed. There are instances of the political executive insisting upon the permanent executives to follow its agenda. Respect for and appreciation of upright bureaucrats has declined. There is an increasing tendency among the political executive to get involved in routine administrative matters such as transfers, posting, etc. Under this scenario, there is a definitive trend towards the ‘politicization of bureaucracy’. The rising materialism and acquisitiveness in social life have also adversely impacted upon the ethical values of both the permanent executive and the political executive.
What are the consequences of this ‘politicization of bureaucracy? Discuss. (250 words) (20 marks)
Introduction The case study highlights the erosion of the delicate balance between the political and permanent executive in a democratic polity. This ethical dilemma mirrors the 2023 Karnataka transfers controversy, where allegations of bureaucratic transfers influenced by political considerations arose, raising questions of fairness and the rule of law, best examined through a deontological lens focusing on duty and adherence to principles.
Stakeholder Identification Political Executive, Permanent Executive (Bureaucracy), Citizens, Judiciary, Media.
Consequences of Politicization of Bureaucracy
- Erosion of Impartiality and Objectivity: Politicization compromises the neutrality of bureaucracy, leading to biased decision-making favoring political agendas over public welfare, violating the public trust doctrine. This fosters an environment of unprofessionalism and erodes public trust.
- Weakening of the Rule of Law: When bureaucratic decisions are influenced by political considerations, the rule of law is undermined. Transfers, postings, and policy implementation become subject to political whims, creating a lack of justice and undermining the chain of command.
- Decline in Administrative Efficiency: Frequent politically motivated transfers disrupt administrative continuity and efficiency. This instability hinders long-term planning and effective implementation of public welfare programs, leading to a loss of integrity in governance.
- Rise of Corruption and Patronage: Politicization can foster a culture of corruption, where loyalty to political figures becomes more important than merit or competence. This creates opportunities for private gain at the expense of public resources, violating the principles of virtue ethics.
- Demoralization of Honest Bureaucrats: Upright bureaucrats who refuse to comply with political dictates may face marginalization and harassment, leading to a decline in morale and a loss of valuable expertise within the system. This directly impacts their character and professionalism.
- Loss of Public Trust: As citizens witness the erosion of impartiality and efficiency in public administration, their trust in government institutions diminishes. This cynicism can weaken democratic participation and create a disconnect between the government and the governed.
Conclusion The politicization of bureaucracy presents a serious threat to the integrity and effectiveness of democratic governance. The "steel frame" of India, once lauded for its impartiality, is at risk. Positive initiatives like the establishment of independent oversight bodies (e.g., Lokpal) demonstrate a commitment to combating corruption and promoting accountability. Moving forward, strengthening institutional mechanisms that protect bureaucratic autonomy, promoting a culture of ethical conduct within both the political and permanent executive, and fostering public awareness about the importance of an impartial bureaucracy are crucial for upholding the principles of good governance and ensuring the long-term health of our democracy. A renewed focus on virtue ethics within the bureaucracy, emphasizing character and integrity, is essential to counteract the corrosive effects of politicization.
Answer Length
Model answers may exceed the word limit for better clarity and depth. Use them as a guide, but always frame your final answer within the exam’s prescribed limit.
In just 60 sec
Evaluate your handwritten answer
- Get detailed feedback
- Model Answer after evaluation
Crack UPSC with your
Personal AI Mentor
An AI-powered ecosystem to learn, practice, and evaluate with discipline
