The British East India Company’s consistent victories over Indian rulers' armies, despite being outnumbered, were due to strategic, organizational, and technological advantages. British forces utilized superior military training, disciplined troops, and advanced weaponry. This analysis highlights key factors behind British dominance, pivotal for understanding colonial expansion in India.

Q.2 Why did the armies of the British East India company – mostly composed of Indian soldiers – win consistently against the more numerous and better equipped armies of the Indian rulers? Give reasons.

Model Answers:

Introduction

The consistent victories of the British East India Company (EIC) armies, which were predominantly composed of Indian soldiers (sepoys), over the more numerous and better-equipped armies of Indian rulers can be attributed to several key factors - 

Body

• Superior military tactics and strategy -  The British employed more advanced military tactics, including the use of disciplined volley fire, infantry squares, and combined arms warfare. These tactics were often unfamiliar to Indian armies and gave the British a significant advantage on the battlefield.

• Unified command structure - The Company's armies operated under a unified command structure, which allowed for better coordination and decision-making. In contrast, many Indian armies suffered from internal rivalries and unclear chains of command.

• Financial resources -  The East India Company had access to significant financial resources, allowing them to maintain a professional standing army and invest in military infrastructure.

• Naval superiority - British naval power allowed them to control coastal areas and major rivers, providing strategic advantages in terms of mobility and supply.

• Divide and rule policy - The British were adept at exploiting divisions among Indian rulers, often allying with one faction against another. This strategy allowed them to defeat stronger opponents by isolating them politically and militarily.
• Better training and discipline - British-led forces were typically better trained and more disciplined than their Indian counterparts. This allowed them to execute complex manoeuvres and maintain formation under fire, which was crucial in battle.
• Experienced Leadership - The British officers were often veterans of European wars and brought with them a wealth of experience in modern warfare.

Conclusion

The combination of superior military strategy, advanced technology, economic resources, effective political manoeuvring, and experienced leadership allowed the British East India Company to consistently defeat the more numerous and better-equipped armies of Indian rulers. 

‍

Instant Mains Evaluation with SuperKalam

✅ Now that you have gone through the model answer, try practicing and writing it in your own words and evaluate it instantly with SuperKalam here - Evaluate Mains Answer instantly

‍