Ashok is Divisional Commissioner of one of the border districts of the North East State. A few years back, Military has taken over the neighbouring country after overthrowing the elected civil government. Civil law situation is prevailing in the country especially in last two years. However, internal situation further deteriorated due to rebel groups taking over control of certain populated areas near town border. Due to intense fight between military and rebel groups, civilian casualties have increased manifold in recent past. In the meantime, one night Ashok got 200-250 people, mainly women and children by firing to cross over to our side of the border. There are also about 10 soldiers with their weapons in military uniform part of this group who wants to cross over. Women and Children are also crying and begging for help. A few of them are injured and bleeding profusely need immediate medical care. Ashok tried to contact Home Secretary of the State but failed to do so due to poor connectivity mainly due to inclement weather.
(a) What are the options available with Ashok to cope with the situation?
(b) What are the ethical and legal dilemmas being faced by Ashok?
(c) Which of the options, do you think would be more appropriate for Ashok to adopt and why?
(d) In the present situation, what are the extra precautionary measures to be taken by the Border Guarding Police in dealing with soldiers in uniform?
Ashok is Divisional Commissioner of one of the border districts of the North East State. A few years back, Military has taken over the neighbouring country after overthrowing the elected civil government. Civil law situation is prevailing in the country especially in last two years. However, internal situation further deteriorated due to rebel groups taking over control of certain populated areas near town border. Due to intense fight between military and rebel groups, civilian casualties have increased manifold in recent past. In the meantime, one night Ashok got 200-250 people, mainly women and children by firing to cross over to our side of the border. There are also about 10 soldiers with their weapons in military uniform part of this group who wants to cross over. Women and Children are also crying and begging for help. A few of them are injured and bleeding profusely need immediate medical care. Ashok tried to contact Home Secretary of the State but failed to do so due to poor connectivity mainly due to inclement weather.
(a) What are the options available with Ashok to cope with the situation?
(b) What are the ethical and legal dilemmas being faced by Ashok?
(c) Which of the options, do you think would be more appropriate for Ashok to adopt and why?
(d) In the present situation, what are the extra precautionary measures to be taken by the Border Guarding Police in dealing with soldiers in uniform?
This case presents a humanitarian crisis at an international border where Divisional Commissioner Ashok faces urgent decisions involving refugee protection, national security, and international law.
The situation involves vulnerable civilians fleeing conflict alongside armed military personnel, creating complex legal and ethical challenges requiring immediate action without higher authority guidance.
Stakeholders
Stakeholders in the case
a) Options Available with Ashok
Option 1: Immediate humanitarian entry for all including soldiers
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Saves lives of injured civilians | Potential security threat from armed soldiers |
| Upholds humanitarian principles | Violation of international border protocols |
| Prevents civilian casualties | May strain local resources |
Option 2: Allow only civilians, deny entry to soldiers who refuse to give up all the weapons they have.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Balances humanitarian needs with security | Separating groups may cause panic |
| Reduces security risks | Soldiers may face persecution |
| Easier to manage refugee situation | Potential diplomatic complications |
Option 3: Deny entry to entire group
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Maintains border security | Violation of humanitarian principles |
| Avoids legal complications | Loss of innocent lives |
| Prevents resource burden | International criticism |
b) Ethical and Legal Dilemmas
Ethical Dilemmas
- Humanitarian duty vs National security: Saving lives versus protecting border integrity.
- Universal human rights vs Sovereign obligations: International humanitarian law versus domestic legal constraints.
- Immediate relief vs Long-term consequences: Urgent medical needs versus potential security implications.
Legal Dilemmas
- Refugee protection vs Immigration laws: Article 21 right to life versus border control regulations.
- International law vs Domestic jurisdiction: Non-refoulement principle versus national sovereignty.
- Emergency powers vs Procedural requirements: Immediate action versus proper authorization channels.
c) Most Appropriate Option
Option 2: Allow only civilians, deny entry to soldiers who refuse to give up all the weapons. Detain such soldiers for further protocols.
Selective humanitarian approach - Allow immediate entry for civilians while securing soldiers separately:
- Provide immediate medical aid to injured civilians under Article 21 constitutional obligation.
- Temporarily detain soldiers following Geneva Convention protocols for proper verification.
- Establish temporary relief camp with Border Guarding Police supervision.
- Document all individuals for legal processing as per Foreigners Act provisions.
- Coordinate with UNHCR and state authorities for long-term rehabilitation.
- This approach balances humanitarian imperatives with security concerns, following examples like Chakma refugee handling in Northeast.
d) Extra Precautionary Measures for Border Guarding Police
- Immediate disarmament of soldiers following standard operating procedures.
- Separate accommodation from civilian refugees to prevent security risks.
- Enhanced surveillance and round-the-clock monitoring of detained personnel.
- Background verification through intelligence agencies and military records.
- Medical screening for potential injuries or psychological trauma.
- Communication protocols with higher authorities once connectivity restores.
- Documentation of weapons, ammunition, and personal belongings as evidence.
The situation demands balancing dharma of protecting vulnerable lives with rajdharma of safeguarding national interests.
As Service before self guides civil servants, Ashok must prioritize humanitarian relief while ensuring security protocols, demonstrating that ethical governance requires courage to act decisively in crisis situations.
Answer Length
Model answers may exceed the word limit for better clarity and depth. Use them as a guide, but always frame your final answer within the exam’s prescribed limit.
In just 60 sec
Evaluate your handwritten answer
- Get detailed feedback
- Model Answer after evaluation
Crack UPSC with your
Personal AI Mentor
An AI-powered ecosystem to learn, practice, and evaluate with discipline
