Moral intuition and moral reasoning are distinct yet interconnected processes guiding ethical decision-making. They often interplay, shaping our judgments and actions in morally complex situations. This essay will differentiate between the two using various parameters.

Differences between Moral Intuition and Moral Reasoning

• Moral Intuition: It refers to the immediate, pre-reflective judgment about right and wrong. It's often emotionally charged and based on ingrained values.

  Example: An off-duty police officer sees an accident on the road and rushes instinctively to help the injured before even thinking about protocols.

• Moral Intuition: It is a conscious, deliberative process employing logic and evidence to reach ethical conclusions. It involves analyzing principles, considering consequences, and justifying choices. Deontological ethics, as espoused by Immanuel Kant, emphasizes the importance of reason and duty in ethical decision-making.

  Example: A District Magistrate must decide whether to demolish an illegal slum to implement a road project. She balances legal mandates, rehabilitation policy, and human dignity, applying ethical reasoning and public interest.

  Aspect	Moral Intuition	Moral Reasoning
  Definition	Immediate, instinctive judgment about right or wrong	Deliberate, logical analysis to reach a moral decision
  Nature	Emotional, automatic, unconscious	Rational, reflective, conscious
  Speed of Response	Quick and spontaneous	Slow, thoughtful
  Based on	Gut feelings, values, social conditioning	Ethical theories, principles (like utilitarianism, deontology)
  Role of Logic	Minimal	Central
  Examples	Helping a crying child instinctively	Analyzing whether a law is just

Both moral intuition and moral reasoning are crucial for ethical decision-making. While intuition provides immediate guidance, reasoning ensures well-considered judgments, particularly in complex situations. A balanced approach, integrating both, is essential for ethical governance and policy-making in India.