The long-sustained image of India as a leader
of the oppressed and marginalised Nations has
disappeared on account of its newfound role in
the emerging global order. Elaborate.
The long-sustained image of India as a leader
of the oppressed and marginalised Nations has
disappeared on account of its newfound role in
the emerging global order. Elaborate.
The evolving India-US relationship, despite strategic convergence, faces friction points that highlight Washington's challenge in accommodating India's aspirations for strategic autonomy and great power status.
US Strategic Vision Venn Diagram
Sources of Friction in India-US Relations
Strategic Autonomy vs Alliance Expectations
- India's multi-alignment policy conflicts with US preference for binary alliance structures
- Continued defense partnership with Russia despite CAATSA sanctions pressure
- India's 36% arms imports from Russia (2020-2024) creates Washington's discomfort
- US struggles to accept India's independent foreign policy choices, including energy imports from Iran and Russia
- S-400 missile system procurement despite US objections demonstrates India's autonomous decision-making
Economic and Trade Disagreements
- US imposition of 50% reciprocal tariffs in 2025 reflects frustration with India's economic policies
- Trade deficit concerns and market access disputes persist despite growing bilateral commerce
- India's Atmanirbhar Bharat initiative sometimes perceived as protectionist by US businesses
- Intellectual property and technology transfer disagreements in sectors like pharmaceuticals
- Different approaches to digital governance and data localization requirements
Washington's Strategic Positioning Challenges
Regional Leadership Recognition
- US difficulty in accepting India as the natural leader of South Asia
- Competition over influence in Indo-Pacific despite Quad partnership
- Limited US support for India's permanent UN Security Council membership aspirations
- Reluctance to fully endorse India's regional security role, particularly regarding Pakistan and China
Global Governance Expectations
- India's balanced approach to Russia-Ukraine conflict frustrates US expectations of aligned positions
- Different priorities in multilateral forums like G20 and BRICS
- India's emphasis on Global South leadership sometimes conflicts with Western priorities
- Divergent approaches to climate change responsibilities and development financing
Examples of Misaligned Expectations
| Issue Area | US Expectation | Indian Position | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Russia Relations | Complete alignment with sanctions | Strategic autonomy | Ongoing tension |
| China Policy | Confrontational approach | Border management + trade | Tactical differences |
| Energy Security | Reduced Russian imports | Diversified energy portfolio | Trade friction |
The challenge lies in Washington's traditional alliance framework struggling to accommodate a rising democratic power that seeks partnership without subordination. India's quest for strategic autonomy while engaging constructively through initiatives like I2U2 and Quad represents a new model of great power cooperation that requires American adaptation to India's civilizational confidence and regional ambitions.
Answer Length
Model answers may exceed the word limit for better clarity and depth. Use them as a guide, but always frame your final answer within the exam’s prescribed limit.
In just 60 sec
Evaluate your handwritten answer
- Get detailed feedback
- Model Answer after evaluation
Model Answers by Subject
Crack UPSC with your
Personal AI Mentor
An AI-powered ecosystem to learn, practice, and evaluate with discipline
