Indian Government has recently strengthened the anti-terrorism laws by amending the unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), 1967 and the NIA act. Analyse the changes in the context of the prevailing security environment while discussing the scope and reasons for opposing the UAPA by human rights organisations.

GS 3
Internal Security
2019
15 Marks

Subject: Internal Security

The recent amendments to the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) and National Investigation Agency (NIA) Act represent significant steps in strengthening India's anti-terrorism framework amid evolving security challenges and global terrorism threats.

Key Changes and Security Environment

  • Individual Designation: The amendments enable designating individuals as terrorists, expanding scope beyond organizations to tackle lone-wolf attacks and individual terror operatives.

  • Enhanced NIA Powers:

    • Inspector-rank officers can now investigate cases, improving operational efficiency.
    • NIA Director-General granted authority for property seizure during investigations.
    • Strengthened investigation capabilities across state boundaries.
  • Security Context:

    • Rising threats from cross-border terrorism and cyber-enabled terror networks.
    • Need for alignment with international conventions like UN Convention for Suppression of Financing of Terrorism.
    • Compliance with Financial Action Task Force (FATF) requirements.

Concerns Raised by Human Rights Organizations

  • Low Conviction Rate:

    • Data shows that between 2014-2022, out of 8,719 registered cases, only 215 convictions were secured while 567 acquittals occurred.
    • From 2015-2020, only 235 convictions out of 8,371 arrests.
  • Human Rights Issues:

    • Amnesty International (2023-24) highlights misuse for silencing critics.
    • Human Rights Watch (2023) reports deteriorating rights situation and repression of activists.
    • Concerns about prolonged detention without trial.
  • Procedural Challenges:

    • Stringent bail provisions leading to extended pre-trial detention.
    • Broad definition of terrorist acts potentially criminalizing legitimate activities.
    • Risk of misuse against journalists, activists, and human rights defenders.

Way Forward

  • Judicial Oversight: Need for robust mechanisms to prevent misuse while maintaining effectiveness against genuine threats.
  • Balanced Approach: Reconciling national security imperatives with constitutional rights and civil liberties.

The challenge lies in maintaining a delicate balance between robust counter-terrorism measures and protecting fundamental rights, as evidenced by initiatives like the National Security Strategy and Multi-Agency Centre (MAC) for intelligence coordination.

Answer Length

Model answers may exceed the word limit for better clarity and depth. Use them as a guide, but always frame your final answer within the exam’s prescribed limit.

In just 60 sec

Evaluate your handwritten answer

  • Get detailed feedback
  • Model Answer after evaluation
Evaluate Now

Crack UPSC with your
Personal AI Mentor

An AI-powered ecosystem to learn, practice, and evaluate with discipline

Start Now
SuperKalam is your personal mentor for UPSC preparation, guiding you at every step of the exam journey.
Follow us

ⓒ Snapstack Technologies Private Limited