Rakesh is a responsible district level officer, who enjoys the trust of his higher officials. Knowing his honesty, the government entrusted him with the responsibility of identifying the beneficiaries under a health care scheme meant for senior citizens.
The criteria to be a beneficiary are the following:
(a) 60 years of age or above.
(b) Belonging to a reserved community.
(c) Family income of less than 1 Lakh rupees per annum.
(d) Post-treatment prognosis is likely to be high to make a positive difference to the quality of life of the beneficiary.
One day, an old couple visited Rakesh’s office with their application. They have been the residents of a village in his district since their birth. The old man is diagnosed with a rare condition that causes obstruction in the large intestine. As a consequence, he has severe abdominal pain frequently that prevents him from doing any physical labour. The couple has no children to support them. The expert surgeon whom they contacted is willing to do the surgery without charging any fee. However, the couple will have to bear the cost of incidental charges, such as medicines, hospitalization, etc., to the tune of rupees one lakh. The couple fulfils all the criteria except criterion ‘b’. However, any financial aid would certainly make a significant difference in their quality of life.
How should Rakesh respond to the situation? (250 words)
Rakesh is a responsible district level officer, who enjoys the trust of his higher officials. Knowing his honesty, the government entrusted him with the responsibility of identifying the beneficiaries under a health care scheme meant for senior citizens.
The criteria to be a beneficiary are the following:
(a) 60 years of age or above.
(b) Belonging to a reserved community.
(c) Family income of less than 1 Lakh rupees per annum.
(d) Post-treatment prognosis is likely to be high to make a positive difference to the quality of life of the beneficiary.
One day, an old couple visited Rakesh’s office with their application. They have been the residents of a village in his district since their birth. The old man is diagnosed with a rare condition that causes obstruction in the large intestine. As a consequence, he has severe abdominal pain frequently that prevents him from doing any physical labour. The couple has no children to support them. The expert surgeon whom they contacted is willing to do the surgery without charging any fee. However, the couple will have to bear the cost of incidental charges, such as medicines, hospitalization, etc., to the tune of rupees one lakh. The couple fulfils all the criteria except criterion ‘b’. However, any financial aid would certainly make a significant difference in their quality of life.
How should Rakesh respond to the situation? (250 words)
The case presents a conflict of interest dilemma where a senior ministry officer faces pressure from the Minister to realign a mega road project for personal gains, compromising public interest and environmental concerns.
Stakeholders
- Primary: Officer, Minister, displaced farmers, government treasury, environment
- Secondary: General public, future beneficiaries, ministry colleagues
Conflicts of Interest
- Personal Financial Gain vs Public Duty: Accepting land purchase offer would constitute corruption and breach of conduct rules
- Political Pressure vs Administrative Integrity: Minister's directive conflicts with objective decision-making and rule of law
- Individual Benefit vs Collective Welfare: Realignment serves personal interests while imposing financial burden on government and farmers
- Career Security vs Ethical Standards: Refusing Minister may affect career prospects but accepting compromises professional ethics
- Economic Efficiency vs Environmental Protection: Modified plan increases costs and environmental damage for private benefit
Responsibilities as Public Servant
- Constitutional Duty: Uphold Article 14 (equality) and ensure decisions serve public interest without discrimination
- Administrative Ethics: Maintain neutrality, transparency and accountability as per All India Services Conduct Rules
- Fiduciary Responsibility: Protect government resources and ensure optimal utilization of public funds
- Environmental Stewardship: Minimize ecological damage and preserve green cover as per environmental guidelines
- Farmer Welfare: Protect agricultural communities from unnecessary displacement and livelihood loss
- Professional Integrity: Resist undue influence and maintain independence in decision-making process
Course of Action
I would politely decline the Minister's proposal, explaining the adverse implications on public exchequer, farmer displacement, and environmental degradation. I would document the interaction and proceed with the original scientifically-planned route, briefing senior officials if pressure persists.
"The best way to find yourself is to lose yourself in the service of others" - true public service demands placing collective welfare above personal gains.
Answer Length
Model answers may exceed the word limit for better clarity and depth. Use them as a guide, but always frame your final answer within the exam’s prescribed limit.
In just 60 sec
Evaluate your handwritten answer
- Get detailed feedback
- Model Answer after evaluation
Model Answers by Subject
Crack UPSC with your
Personal AI Mentor
An AI-powered ecosystem to learn, practice, and evaluate with discipline
