You are the head of the Human Resources department of an organisation. One day one of the workers died on duty. His family was demanding compensation. However, the company denied compensation because it was revealed in investigation that he was drunk at the time of the accident. The workers of the company went to strike demanding compensation for the family of the deceased. The Chairman of the management board has asked for your recommendation.
What recommendation would you provide the management?
Discuss the merits and demerits of each of the recommendations.
You are the head of the Human Resources department of an organisation. One day one of the workers died on duty. His family was demanding compensation. However, the company denied compensation because it was revealed in investigation that he was drunk at the time of the accident. The workers of the company went to strike demanding compensation for the family of the deceased. The Chairman of the management board has asked for your recommendation.
What recommendation would you provide the management?
Discuss the merits and demerits of each of the recommendations.
The case presents a complex workplace tragedy where a worker's death during duty creates conflicting demands between legal compliance and humanitarian considerations. The situation involves balancing company policies, worker solidarity, and the deceased's family's welfare while maintaining organizational integrity.
Stakeholders
- Primary Stakeholders: Deceased worker's family, striking workers, company management, HR department
- Secondary Stakeholders: Other employees, labor unions, regulatory authorities, company shareholders
Recommendations for Management
Option 1: Complete denial of compensation citing policy violation
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| - Maintains policy integrity and legal compliance | - Creates severe employee unrest and strike escalation |
| - Sets clear precedent against workplace violations | - Damages company reputation and employee relations |
| - Protects company from future similar claims | - Ignores humanitarian aspect of family's situation |
| - Legally defensible position under labor laws | - May lead to prolonged industrial action affecting productivity |
Option 2: Provide full compensation despite policy violation
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| - Demonstrates humanitarian approach and empathy | - Sets dangerous precedent encouraging policy violations |
| - Resolves strike immediately restoring operations | - May face legal challenges from shareholders |
| - Maintains positive employee relations | - Undermines workplace safety protocols |
| - Shows corporate social responsibility | - Could lead to increased insurance premiums |
Option 3: Provide ex-gratia payment while maintaining policy stance
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| - Balances legal compliance with humanitarian concerns | - May be perceived as inadequate by workers |
| - Maintains policy integrity while showing compassion | - Could still face resistance from management board |
| - Provides face-saving solution for all parties | - Sets ambiguous precedent for future cases |
| - Demonstrates corporate responsibility without legal admission | - Requires careful communication to avoid misinterpretation |
Option 4: Establish comprehensive welfare fund for all employees
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| - Creates systematic approach to employee welfare | - Requires significant financial commitment |
| - Addresses current crisis while preventing future issues | - Implementation timeline may not resolve immediate strike |
| - Enhances company's employer brand significantly | - May face resistance due to increased operational costs |
| - Demonstrates long-term commitment to worker welfare | - Needs board approval and policy restructuring |
The balanced approach of providing ex-gratia payment while strengthening safety protocols and establishing a comprehensive welfare fund would address immediate concerns while maintaining organizational integrity. This demonstrates that compassion and compliance can coexist in ethical leadership.
"The best way to find yourself is to lose yourself in the service of others."
Answer Length
Model answers may exceed the word limit for better clarity and depth. Use them as a guide, but always frame your final answer within the exam’s prescribed limit.
Evaluate this PYQ now
Write your answer & evaluate in just 60 seconds
500+ students evaluated
Model Answers from
- 2017Ethics: Case Study20 MarksView Answer
You are a Public Information Officer (PIO) in a government department. You are aware that the RTI Act 2005 envisages transparency and accountability in administration. The act has functioned as a check on the supposedly arbitrarily administrative behaviour and actions. However, as a PIO you have observed that there are citizens who filed RTI applications not for themselves but on behalf of such stakeholders who purportedly want to have access to information to further their own interests. At the same time there are these RTI activists who routinely file RTI applications and attempt to extort money from the decision makers. This type of RTI activism has affected the functioning of the administration adversely and also possibly jeopardises the genuineness of the applications which are essentially aimed at getting justice.
What measures would you suggest to separate genuine and non-genuine applications? Give merits and demerits of your suggestions. - 2017Ethics: Case Study20 MarksView Answer
A building permitted for three floors, while being extended illegally to 6 floors by a builder, collapses. As a consequence, a number of innocent labourers including women and children died. These labourers are migrants of different places. The government immediately announced cash relief to the aggrieved families and arrested the builder.
Give reasons for such incidents taking place across the country. Suggest measures to prevent their occurrence. - 2017Ethics: Case Study20 MarksView Answer
You are the manager of a spare parts company A and you have to negotiate a deal with the manager of a large manufacturing company B. The deal is highly competitive and sealing the deal is critical for your company. The deal is being worked out over a dinner. After dinner the manager of manufacturing company B offered to drop you to the hotel in his car. On the way to hotel he happens to hit motorcycle injuring the motorcyclist badly. You know the manager was driving fast and thus lost control. The law enforcement officer comes to investigate the issue and you are the sole eyewitness to it. Knowing the strict laws pertaining to road accidents you are aware that your honest account of the incident would lead to the prosecution of the manager and as a consequence the deal is likely to be jeopardised, which is of immense importance to your company.
What are the dilemmas you face? What will be your response to the situation? - 2017Ethics: Case Study20 MarksView Answer
You are aspiring to become an IAS officer and you have cleared various stages and now you have been selected for the personal interview. On the day of the interview, on the way to the venue you saw an accident where a mother and child who happen to be your relatives were badly injured. They needed immediate help.
What would you have done in such a situation? Justify your action - 2017Ethics: Case Study20 MarksView Answer
You are an honest and responsible civil servant. You often observe the following:
(a) There is a general perception that adhering to ethical conduct one may face difficulties to oneself and cause problems for the family, whereas unfair practices may help to reach the career goals.
(b) When the number of people adopting unfair means is large, a small minority having a penchant towards ethical means makes no difference.
(c) Sticking to ethical means is detrimental to the larger developmental goals.
(d) While one may not involve oneself in large unethical practices, but giving and accepting small gifts makes the system more efficient.
Examine the above statements with their merits and demerits. (250 words)
Model Answers by Subject
Crack UPSC with your
Personal AI Mentor
An AI-powered ecosystem to learn, practice, and evaluate with discipline
