You are an honest and responsible civil servant. You often observe the following:
(a) There is a general perception that adhering to ethical conduct one may face difficulties to oneself and cause problems for the family, whereas unfair practices may help to reach the career goals.
(b) When the number of people adopting unfair means is large, a small minority having a penchant towards ethical means makes no difference.
(c) Sticking to ethical means is detrimental to the larger developmental goals.
(d) While one may not involve oneself in large unethical practices, but giving and accepting small gifts makes the system more efficient.
Examine the above statements with their merits and demerits. (250 words)
You are an honest and responsible civil servant. You often observe the following:
(a) There is a general perception that adhering to ethical conduct one may face difficulties to oneself and cause problems for the family, whereas unfair practices may help to reach the career goals.
(b) When the number of people adopting unfair means is large, a small minority having a penchant towards ethical means makes no difference.
(c) Sticking to ethical means is detrimental to the larger developmental goals.
(d) While one may not involve oneself in large unethical practices, but giving and accepting small gifts makes the system more efficient.
Examine the above statements with their merits and demerits. (250 words)
The observations reflect common rationalizations that challenge ethical governance in civil services, creating a moral relativism that undermines administrative integrity and public trust in democratic institutions.
Stakeholders
- Primary Stakeholders: Civil servants, their families, citizens, government institutions
- Secondary Stakeholders: Political leadership, judiciary, media, future generations
Examination of Statements
Statement (a): Ethical conduct causes personal difficulties
- Merits: Acknowledges real pressures faced by honest officers; recognizes family concerns about career progression; highlights systemic issues rewarding compliance over integrity
- Demerits: Creates false dichotomy between ethics and success; ignores long-term reputational benefits; undermines Kantian duty-based ethics; violates constitutional oath under Article 311
Statement (b): Individual ethics meaningless when majority is corrupt
- Merits: Recognizes collective action problems; highlights systemic nature of corruption; acknowledges individual limitations in large systems
- Demerits: Promotes moral abdication; contradicts virtue ethics principles; ignores ripple effects of individual integrity; examples like E. Sreedharan and Kiran Bedi prove individual impact possible
Statement (c): Ethics detrimental to developmental goals
- Merits: Acknowledges time constraints in development projects; recognizes procedural delays; highlights urgency in poverty alleviation
- Demerits: Creates false trade-off between means and ends; sustainable development requires ethical foundations; corruption ultimately increases project costs; violates utilitarian principle of greatest good
Statement (d): Small gifts enhance system efficiency
- Merits: Recognizes cultural practices; acknowledges relationship-building aspects; may reduce minor procedural delays
- Demerits: Normalizes corruption; creates slippery slope toward larger bribes; violates CCS Conduct Rules; undermines equal treatment principle under Article 14
These rationalizations, while acknowledging systemic challenges, fundamentally compromise administrative ethics. True efficiency emerges from transparent, accountable governance that serves public interest over personal convenience. "The best way to find yourself is to lose yourself in the service of others."
Answer Length
Model answers may exceed the word limit for better clarity and depth. Use them as a guide, but always frame your final answer within the exam’s prescribed limit.
Evaluate this PYQ now
Write your answer & evaluate in just 60 seconds
500+ students evaluated
Model Answers from
- 2017Ethics: Case Study20 MarksView Answer
You are a Public Information Officer (PIO) in a government department. You are aware that the RTI Act 2005 envisages transparency and accountability in administration. The act has functioned as a check on the supposedly arbitrarily administrative behaviour and actions. However, as a PIO you have observed that there are citizens who filed RTI applications not for themselves but on behalf of such stakeholders who purportedly want to have access to information to further their own interests. At the same time there are these RTI activists who routinely file RTI applications and attempt to extort money from the decision makers. This type of RTI activism has affected the functioning of the administration adversely and also possibly jeopardises the genuineness of the applications which are essentially aimed at getting justice.
What measures would you suggest to separate genuine and non-genuine applications? Give merits and demerits of your suggestions. - 2017Ethics: Case Study20 MarksView Answer
A building permitted for three floors, while being extended illegally to 6 floors by a builder, collapses. As a consequence, a number of innocent labourers including women and children died. These labourers are migrants of different places. The government immediately announced cash relief to the aggrieved families and arrested the builder.
Give reasons for such incidents taking place across the country. Suggest measures to prevent their occurrence. - 2017Ethics: Case Study20 MarksView Answer
You are the manager of a spare parts company A and you have to negotiate a deal with the manager of a large manufacturing company B. The deal is highly competitive and sealing the deal is critical for your company. The deal is being worked out over a dinner. After dinner the manager of manufacturing company B offered to drop you to the hotel in his car. On the way to hotel he happens to hit motorcycle injuring the motorcyclist badly. You know the manager was driving fast and thus lost control. The law enforcement officer comes to investigate the issue and you are the sole eyewitness to it. Knowing the strict laws pertaining to road accidents you are aware that your honest account of the incident would lead to the prosecution of the manager and as a consequence the deal is likely to be jeopardised, which is of immense importance to your company.
What are the dilemmas you face? What will be your response to the situation? - 2017Ethics: Case Study20 MarksView Answer
You are the head of the Human Resources department of an organisation. One day one of the workers died on duty. His family was demanding compensation. However, the company denied compensation because it was revealed in investigation that he was drunk at the time of the accident. The workers of the company went to strike demanding compensation for the family of the deceased. The Chairman of the management board has asked for your recommendation.
What recommendation would you provide the management?
Discuss the merits and demerits of each of the recommendations. - 2017Ethics: Case Study20 MarksView Answer
You are aspiring to become an IAS officer and you have cleared various stages and now you have been selected for the personal interview. On the day of the interview, on the way to the venue you saw an accident where a mother and child who happen to be your relatives were badly injured. They needed immediate help.
What would you have done in such a situation? Justify your action
Model Answers by Subject
Crack UPSC with your
Personal AI Mentor
An AI-powered ecosystem to learn, practice, and evaluate with discipline
