LiveUPSC Prelims 2026 Answer Key is LIVEView Now

ABC Ltd. Is a large transnational company having diversified business activities with a huge shareholder base. The company is continuously expanding the generating employment. The company, in its expansion and diversification programme, decides to establish a new plant at Vikaspuri, an area which is underdeveloped. The new plant is designed to use energy efficient technology that will help the company to save production cost by 20%. The company’s decision goes well with the Government policy of attracting investment to develop such underdeveloped regions. The government has also announced tax holiday for five years for the companies that invest in underdeveloped areas. However, the new plant may bring chaos for the inhabitants of Vikaspuri region, which is otherwise tranquil. The new plant may result in increased cost of living, aliens migrating to the region, disturbing the social and economic order. The company sensing the possible protest tried to educate the people of Vikaspuri region and public in general that how its Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) policy would help overcome the likely difficulties of the residents of Vikaspuri region. In spite of this the protests begin and some of the residents decided to approach the judiciary as their plea before the Government did not yield any result. a) Identify the issues involved in the case b) What can be suggested to satisfy the company’s goal and to address the residents’ concern?

Ethics
Ethics: Case Study
2016
25 Marks

The case presents a complex development dilemma where corporate expansion and regional development clash with community welfare and environmental concerns. ABC Ltd.'s proposed plant in Vikaspuri exemplifies the tension between economic growth and social harmony, highlighting the challenges of inclusive development in underdeveloped regions.

Stakeholders

  • Primary Stakeholders: ABC Ltd., Vikaspuri residents, local government, shareholders
  • Secondary Stakeholders: Migrant workers, environmental groups, judiciary, state government, future generations

a) Issues Involved in the Case

  • Economic displacement of local communities due to rising cost of living and property prices
  • Cultural disruption from influx of migrant workers altering traditional social fabric
  • Environmental concerns despite energy-efficient technology, potential pollution and resource strain
  • Inadequate consultation with local communities before project approval
  • Governance failure in addressing residents' concerns through proper channels
  • Social inequality where corporate benefits may not translate to local prosperity
  • Loss of traditional livelihoods as land use patterns change
  • Infrastructure strain on existing facilities like healthcare, education, and transportation
  • Democratic deficit in decision-making process excluding community voices

b) Suggestions to Satisfy Company's Goal and Address Residents' Concerns

Short-term Measures

  • Tripartite dialogue involving company, residents, and government facilitated by neutral mediators
  • Comprehensive Environmental and Social Impact Assessment with independent monitoring
  • Local employment quota ensuring 70% jobs reserved for Vikaspuri residents with skill development programs
  • Community Development Fund allocating 2% of annual profits for local infrastructure and welfare

Long-term Solutions

  • Participatory planning model following Panchayati Raj principles under Article 243G for local self-governance
  • Revenue sharing mechanism providing residents annual compensation from company profits
  • Cultural preservation initiatives protecting local traditions while embracing development
  • Affordable housing schemes preventing displacement due to rising property costs
  • Healthcare and education infrastructure development before plant operationalization

Policy Integration

  • Implementation aligned with Sustainable Development Goals and National Manufacturing Policy
  • Corporate Social Responsibility framework under Section 135 of Companies Act 2013
  • Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act 2013 compliance

The success of this initiative depends on transforming development from a zero-sum game to a collaborative partnership. As emphasized, "Development that does not include everyone is not sustainable development." True progress emerges when corporate growth becomes a catalyst for community empowerment rather than displacement.

Answer Length

Model answers may exceed the word limit for better clarity and depth. Use them as a guide, but always frame your final answer within the exam’s prescribed limit.

In just 60 sec

Evaluate your handwritten answer

  • Get detailed feedback
  • Model Answer after evaluation
Evaluate Now

Model Answers by Papers

Year-Wise Model Answer

Crack UPSC with your
Personal AI Mentor

An AI-powered ecosystem to learn, practice, and evaluate with discipline

SuperKalam
SuperKalam is your personal mentor for UPSC preparation, guiding you at every step of the exam journey.

Download the App

Get it on Google PlayDownload on the App Store
Follow us

ⓒ Snapstack Technologies Private Limited