A fresh engineering graduate gets a job in a prestigious chemical industry. She likes the work. The salary is also good. However, after a few months she accidentally discovers that a highly toxic waste is being secretly discharged into a river nearby. This is causing health problems to the villagers downstream who depend on the river for their water needs. She is perturbed and mentions her concern to her colleagues who have been with the company for longer periods. They advise her to keep quite as anyone who mentions the topic is summarily dismissed. She cannot risk losing her job as she is the sole bread-winner for her family and has to support her ailing parents and siblings. At first, she thinks that if her seniors are keeping quiet, why should she stick out her neck. But her conscience pricks her to do something to save the river and the people who depend upon it. At heart she feels that the advice of silence given by her friends is not correct though she cannot give reasons for it. She thinks you are a wise person and seeks your advice. (a) What arguments can you advance to show her that keeping quiet is not morally right? (b) What course of action would you advise her to adopt and why?
A fresh engineering graduate gets a job in a prestigious chemical industry. She likes the work. The salary is also good. However, after a few months she accidentally discovers that a highly toxic waste is being secretly discharged into a river nearby. This is causing health problems to the villagers downstream who depend on the river for their water needs. She is perturbed and mentions her concern to her colleagues who have been with the company for longer periods. They advise her to keep quite as anyone who mentions the topic is summarily dismissed. She cannot risk losing her job as she is the sole bread-winner for her family and has to support her ailing parents and siblings. At first, she thinks that if her seniors are keeping quiet, why should she stick out her neck. But her conscience pricks her to do something to save the river and the people who depend upon it. At heart she feels that the advice of silence given by her friends is not correct though she cannot give reasons for it. She thinks you are a wise person and seeks your advice. (a) What arguments can you advance to show her that keeping quiet is not morally right? (b) What course of action would you advise her to adopt and why?
The case presents a classic whistleblowing dilemma where a young engineer discovers her company's illegal toxic waste discharge into a river, causing health problems for downstream villagers. She faces the moral conflict between personal financial security and public welfare, complicated by workplace pressure and family responsibilities.
Stakeholders
- Primary Stakeholders: The engineer, affected villagers, her family members, company management
- Secondary Stakeholders: Colleagues, regulatory authorities, environmental activists, future generations
(a) Arguments Against Keeping Quiet
- Violation of fundamental duty: Article 51A(g) mandates every citizen to protect the environment; silence becomes complicity in environmental destruction
- Professional ethics breach: Engineering code of conduct prioritizes public safety over employer loyalty; remaining silent violates professional integrity
- Utilitarian perspective: The harm to hundreds of villagers far outweighs her individual job security concerns
- Deontological imperative: Kant's categorical imperative suggests her action should be universalizable - if all engineers stayed silent about toxic discharge, society would collapse
- Legal complicity: Under Environment Protection Act 1986, knowledge of pollution without reporting makes her potentially liable
- Virtue ethics violation: Courage, honesty, and justice are fundamental virtues that silence would compromise
- Intergenerational responsibility: Future generations have the right to clean environment; her silence perpetuates irreversible damage
- Democratic duty: Citizens have obligation to expose wrongdoing for rule of law to function effectively
(b) Course of Action
Immediate Steps
- Document evidence systematically including photographs, water samples, and health impact data while maintaining discretion
- Consult Central Pollution Control Board guidelines and Water Prevention and Control of Pollution Act 1974 provisions
- Approach National Green Tribunal through environmental lawyers who often provide pro-bono services
- Contact investigative journalists specializing in environmental issues for media exposure
Strategic Approach
- File complaint with State Pollution Control Board under Right to Information Act 2005 for transparency
- Engage with local NGOs and environmental activists for collective action and legal support
- Utilize Whistleblower Protection Act 2014 provisions for legal immunity against retaliation
- Approach District Collector for immediate intervention under disaster management protocols
Risk Mitigation
- Simultaneously search for alternative employment opportunities leveraging her engineering qualifications
- Build alliance with like-minded colleagues for collective whistleblowing to reduce individual targeting
- Maintain anonymous reporting initially through pollution helplines and citizen portals
- Seek support from professional engineering associations for career protection
This approach balances moral courage with practical wisdom, ensuring both environmental justice and personal security through legal channels and community support.
The path of righteousness may seem difficult initially, but it builds character and contributes to a just society. "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing."
Answer Length
Model answers may exceed the word limit for better clarity and depth. Use them as a guide, but always frame your final answer within the exam’s prescribed limit.
Ethics: Case Study PYQs from 2016
- 25 MarksView Answer
Saraswati was a successful IT professional in USA. Moved by the patriotic sense of doing something for the country she returned to India. Together with some other like minded friends, she formed an NGO to build a school for a poor rural community. The objective of the school was to provide the best quality modern education at a nominal cost. She soon discovered that she has to seek permission from a number of Government agencies. The rules and procedures were quite confusing and cumbersome. What frustrated her most was delays, callous attitude of officials and constant demand for bribes. Her experience and the experience of many others like her has deterred people from taking up social service projects. A measure of Government control over voluntary social work is necessary. But it should not be exercised in a coercive a corrupt manner. What measures can you suggest to ensure that due control is exercised but well meaning, honest NGO efforts are not thwarted?
- 25 MarksView Answer
ABC Ltd. Is a large transnational company having diversified business activities with a huge shareholder base. The company is continuously expanding the generating employment. The company, in its expansion and diversification programme, decides to establish a new plant at Vikaspuri, an area which is underdeveloped. The new plant is designed to use energy efficient technology that will help the company to save production cost by 20%. The company’s decision goes well with the Government policy of attracting investment to develop such underdeveloped regions. The government has also announced tax holiday for five years for the companies that invest in underdeveloped areas. However, the new plant may bring chaos for the inhabitants of Vikaspuri region, which is otherwise tranquil. The new plant may result in increased cost of living, aliens migrating to the region, disturbing the social and economic order. The company sensing the possible protest tried to educate the people of Vikaspuri region and public in general that how its Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) policy would help overcome the likely difficulties of the residents of Vikaspuri region. In spite of this the protests begin and some of the residents decided to approach the judiciary as their plea before the Government did not yield any result. a) Identify the issues involved in the case b) What can be suggested to satisfy the company’s goal and to address the residents’ concern?
- 20 MarksView Answer
You are a young, aspiring and sincere employee in a Government office working as an assistant to the director of your department. Since you have joined recently, you need to learn and progress. Luckily your superior is very kind and ready to train you for your job. He is a very intelligent and well-informed person having knowledge of various departments. In short, you respect your boss and are looking forward to learn a lot from him. Since you have good tuning with the boss, he started depending on you. One day due to ill health he invited you at his place for finishing some urgent work. You reached his house and before you could ring the bell you heard shouting noises. You waited for a while. After entering the house the boss greeted you and explained the work. But you were constantly disturbed by the crying of a woman. At last, you inquired with the boss but his answer did not satisfy you. Next day, you were compelled to inquire further in the office and found out that his behavior is very bad at home with his wife. He also beats up bit wife. His wife is not well educated and is a simple woman in comparison to her husband. you see that though your boss is a nice person in the office, he is engaged in domestic violence at home. In such a situation, you are left with the following options. Analyse each option with its consequences. (a) just ignore thinking about it because it is their personal matter. (b) Report the case to the appropriate authority. (c) Your own innovative approach towards the situation.
- 20 MarksView Answer
Suppose you are an officer in-charge of implementing a social service scheme to provide support to old and destitute women. An old and illiterate woman comes to you to avail the benefits of the scheme. However, she has no documents to show that she fulfills the eligibility criteria. But after meeting her and listening to her you feel that she certainly needs support. Your enquirers also show that she is really destitute and living in a pitiable condition. You are in a dilemma as to what to do. Putting her under the scheme without necessary documents would clearly be violation of rules. But denying her the support would be cruel and inhuman. a) Can you think of a rational way to resolve this dilemma? b) Give your reasons for it.
- 20 MarksView Answer
Land needed for mining, dams and other large-scale projects is acquired mostly from Adivasis, hill dwellers and rural communities. The displaced persons are paid monetary compensation as per the legal provisions. However, the payment is often tardy. In any case, hit cannot sustain the displaced families for long. These people do not possess marketable skills to engage in some other accusation. They end up as low paid migrant laborers. Moreover, their development go to industries, industrialists and urban communities whereas the costs are passed on to these poor helpless people. This unjust distribution of costs and benefits is unethical. Suppose you have been entrusted with the task of drafting a better compensation-cum-rehabilitation policy for such displaced persons, how would you approach the problem and what would be the main elements of your suggested policy?
In just 60 sec
Evaluate your handwritten answer
- Get detailed feedback
- Model Answer after evaluation
Model Answers by Subject
Crack UPSC with your
Personal AI Mentor
An AI-powered ecosystem to learn, practice, and evaluate with discipline

