Suppose you are the CEO of a company that manufactures specialized electronic equipment used by a government department. You have submitted your bid for the supply of this equipment to the department. Both the quality and cost of your offer are better than those of the competitors. Yet the concerned officer is demanding a hefty bribe for approving the tender Getting the order is important both for you and your company. Not getting the order would mean closing a production line. It may also affect your own career. However, as a value-conscious person, You do not want to give bribe. Valid arguments can be advanced both for giving the bribe and getting the order, and for refusing to pay the bribe and risking the loss of the order. What those arguments could be, Could there be any better way to get out of this dilemma? If so, outline the main elements of this third way, pointing out its merits.
Suppose you are the CEO of a company that manufactures specialized electronic equipment used by a government department. You have submitted your bid for the supply of this equipment to the department. Both the quality and cost of your offer are better than those of the competitors. Yet the concerned officer is demanding a hefty bribe for approving the tender Getting the order is important both for you and your company. Not getting the order would mean closing a production line. It may also affect your own career. However, as a value-conscious person, You do not want to give bribe. Valid arguments can be advanced both for giving the bribe and getting the order, and for refusing to pay the bribe and risking the loss of the order. What those arguments could be, Could there be any better way to get out of this dilemma? If so, outline the main elements of this third way, pointing out its merits.
The case presents a corruption dilemma where a CEO faces demands for bribes despite having the best technical and financial proposal, highlighting the conflict between business survival and ethical integrity in public procurement processes.
Stakeholders
- Primary Stakeholders: CEO, company employees, government officer, government department, competitors
- Secondary Stakeholders: Company shareholders, industry peers, general public, regulatory authorities
Arguments for Giving Bribe and Getting Order
- Business Survival: Prevents production line closure and potential job losses for employees
- Competitive Disadvantage: Competitors may be willing to pay bribes, creating unfair market conditions
- Career Protection: Avoiding personal professional setbacks and maintaining leadership credibility
- Stakeholder Obligations: Fulfilling duties toward shareholders and employees dependent on company success
- Pragmatic Approach: Working within existing corrupt system to achieve legitimate business objectives
Arguments for Refusing Bribe and Risking Order Loss
- Legal Compliance: Avoiding violations under Prevention of Corruption Act and maintaining clean business practices
- Ethical Integrity: Upholding personal values and corporate governance standards as per Companies Act 2013
- Long-term Reputation: Preserving company brand value and stakeholder trust for sustainable growth
- Systemic Change: Contributing to corruption-free business environment and fair competition
- Constitutional Values: Supporting Article 14 principles of equality and transparent governance
Third Way - Alternative Approach
- Formal Documentation: Submit detailed written proposal highlighting superior quality and cost-effectiveness with copies to higher authorities
- Transparency Mechanisms: Utilize RTI Act 2005 provisions to seek information about tender evaluation criteria and timelines
- Escalation Strategy: Approach senior officials or minister's office through proper channels, emphasizing public interest in cost-effective procurement
- Industry Coalition: Collaborate with other ethical companies to collectively approach Central Vigilance Commission about systemic corruption
- Media and Civil Society: Engage with investigative journalists and anti-corruption organizations while maintaining confidentiality
- Legal Recourse: File complaint with CBI or state vigilance department with evidence of bribe demands
- Alternative Markets: Simultaneously explore other government departments or private sector opportunities to reduce dependency
Merits of Third Way
- Systemic Impact: Addresses root cause of corruption rather than perpetuating it
- Legal Protection: Provides whistleblower protection under Whistleblowers Protection Act 2014
- Competitive Advantage: Establishes reputation for integrity, attracting ethical clients and partners
- Risk Mitigation: Avoids legal consequences while creating multiple business opportunities
This approach transforms individual ethical dilemma into collective action for systemic change, demonstrating that "integrity is not just about doing right when convenient, but standing firm when tested."
Answer Length
Model answers may exceed the word limit for better clarity and depth. Use them as a guide, but always frame your final answer within the exam’s prescribed limit.
Ethics: Case Study PYQs from 2014
- 20 MarksView Answer
In our country, the migration of rural people to towns and cities is increasing drastically. This is causing serious problems both in the rural as well as in the urban areas. In fact, things are becoming really unmanageable. Can you analyze this problem in detail and indicate not only the socio-economic but also the emotional and attitudinal factors responsible for this problem? Also, distinctly bring out why – (a) educated youth are trying to shift to urban areas (b) landless poor people are migrating to urban slums (c) even some farmers are selling off the, land and trying to settle in urban areas taking , petty jobs.
What feasible steps can you suggest which will be effective in controlling this serious problem of our country? - 20 MarksView Answer
Rameshwar successfully cleared the prestigious civil services examination and was excited about the opportunity that he would get through the civil services to serve the country. However, soon after joining the services, he realized that things are not as rosy as he had imagined. He found a number of malpractices prevailing in the department assigned to him. For example, funds under various schemes and grants were being misappropriated. The official facilities were frequently being used for personal needs by the officers and staff. After some time, he noticed that the process of recruiting the staff was also not up to the mark. Prospective candidates were required to write an examination in which a lot of cheating was going on. Some candidates were provided external help in the examination. Rameshwar brought these incidents to the notice of his seniors. However, he was advised to keep his eyes, ears and mouth shut and ignore all these things which were taking place with the connivance of the higher-ups. Rameshwar felt highly disillusioned and uncomfortable. He comes to you seeking your advice. Indicate various options that you think are available in this situation. How would you help him to evaluate these options and choose the most appropriate path to be adopted?
- 20 MarksView Answer
You are a no-nonsense, honest officer. You have been transferred to a remote district to head a department that is notorious for its inefficiency and callousness. You find that the main cause of the poor state of affairs is the indiscipline of a section of employees. They do not work themselves and also disrupt the workings of others. You first warned the troublemakers to mend their ways or else face disciplinary action. When the warning had little effect, you issued a show cause notice to the ringleaders. As a retaliatory measure, these troublemakers instigated a woman employee amongst them to file a complaint of sexual harassment against you with the Women’s Commission. The Commission promptly seeks your explanation. The matter is also publicized in the media to embarrass you further. Some of the options to handle this situation could be as follows: (i) Give your explanation to the Commission and go soft on the disciplinary action. (ii) Ignore the commission and proceed firmly with the disciplinary action. (iii) Brief your higher-ups, seek directions from them and act accordingly. Suggest any other possible option(s). Evaluate all of them and suggest the best course of action, giving your reasons for it.
- 20 MarksView Answer
Suppose one of your close friends, who is also aspiring for civil services, comes to you for discussing some of the issues related to ethical conduct in public service. He raises the following points:- (i)In the present times, when unethical environment is quite prevalent, individual attempts to stick to ethical principles may cause a lot of problems in one’s career. It may cause hardship to the family members as well as risk to one’s life. Why should we not be pragmatic and follow the path of least resistance, and be happy with doing whatever good we can? (ii) When so many people are adopting wrong means and are grossly harming the system, what difference would it make if only a small minority tries to be ethical? They are going t be rather ineffective and are bound to get frustrated. (iii) If we become fussy about ethical considerations, will it not hamper the economic progress of our country? After all in the present age of high competition we cannot afford to be left behind in the race of development (iv) It is understandable that we should not get involved in grossly unethical practices, but giving and accepting small gratifications and doing small favours increases everybody’s motivation. It also makes the system more efficient. What is wrong in adopting such practices? Critically analyze the above viewpoints. On the basis of this analysis, what will be your advice to your friend?
- 20 MarksView Answer
Now-a-days, there is an increasing thrust on economic development all around the globe. At the same time, there is also an increasing concern about environmental degradation caused by development. Many a time, we face a direct conflict between development activity and environmental quality. It is neither feasible to stop or curtail the developmental process, nor it is advisable to keep degrading the environment, as it threatens our very survival. Discuss some feasible strategies which could be adopted to eliminate this conflict and which could lead to sustainable development.
In just 60 sec
Evaluate your handwritten answer
- Get detailed feedback
- Model Answer after evaluation
Model Answers by Subject
Crack UPSC with your
Personal AI Mentor
An AI-powered ecosystem to learn, practice, and evaluate with discipline

