LiveUPSC Prelims 2026 Answer Key is LIVEView Now

You are the Executive Director of an upcoming InfoTech Company that is making a name for itself in the market. Mr. A, who is a star performer, is heading the marketing team. In a short period of one year, he has helped in doubling the revenues as well as creating a high brand equity for the Company so much so that you are thinking of promoting him. However, you have been receiving information from many corners about his attitude towards the female colleagues; particularly his habit of making loose comments on women. In addition, he regularly sends indecent SMS to all the team members including his female colleagues. One day, late in the evening, Mrs. X, who is one of Mr. A’s team members, comes to you visibly disturbed. She complains about the continued misconduct of Mr. A, who has been making undesirable advances toward her and has even tried to touch her inappropriately in his cabin. She tenders her resignation and leaves your office.

a) What are the options available to you?

b) Evaluate each of these options and choose the option you would adopt, giving reasons.

Ethics
Ethics: Case Study
2013
20 Marks

The case presents a critical workplace sexual harassment dilemma where exceptional professional performance conflicts with serious misconduct allegations, requiring immediate ethical intervention to protect organizational integrity and employee safety.

Stakeholders

  • Primary Stakeholders: Mrs. X (complainant), Mr. A (accused), female colleagues, Executive Director, company employees
  • Secondary Stakeholders: Company shareholders, clients, industry reputation, future employees
Mrs X stakeholder Diagram

Mrs X stakeholder Diagram

a) What are the options available to you?

Option 1: Ignore the complaint and retain Mr. A due to his exceptional performance

ProsCons
Maintains revenue growth trajectoryViolates POSH Act 2013 legal obligations
Preserves high-performing marketing leadershipCreates hostile work environment
Avoids business disruptionExposes company to legal liability
Retains brand equity builderDamages organizational culture permanently

Option 2: Immediately terminate Mr. A without investigation

ProsCons
Sends strong anti-harassment messageViolates principles of natural justice
Protects other female employeesLacks due process as per company policy
Demonstrates zero-tolerance policyMay face wrongful termination lawsuit
Prevents further incidentsCould demoralize other high performers

Option 3: Conduct thorough investigation through Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) as per POSH Act

ProsCons
Ensures legal compliance with POSH Act 2013Time-consuming process affecting team dynamics
Provides fair hearing to both partiesMay lead to negative publicity
Maintains procedural justiceRisk of evidence tampering
Creates precedent for future casesPotential talent loss during investigation

Option 4: Transfer Mr. A to different department while investigating

ProsCons
Separates parties during investigationAppears like organizational cover-up
Maintains business continuityDoesn't address core harassment issue
Reduces immediate conflictMay be seen as rewarding misconduct

b) Evaluate each of these options and choose the option you would adopt, giving reasons

I would adopt Option 3 - conducting thorough ICC investigation while ensuring interim protection measures.

Rationale:

  • Legal Compliance: POSH Act 2013 mandates proper investigation through ICC, ensuring constitutional protection under Article 21 (right to dignified life)
  • Ethical Imperative: Balances utilitarian principle (greatest good for maximum employees) with deontological duty (moral obligation to protect vulnerable)
  • Organizational Integrity: Performance cannot override fundamental workplace safety, aligning with virtue ethics of justice and courage

Implementation Strategy:

  • Immediately constitute ICC with external member as per Section 4 of POSH Act
  • Implement interim measures: restrict Mr. A's access to female colleagues, provide alternative reporting structure
  • Document all evidence including SMS records and witness statements
  • Ensure Mrs. X's resignation is kept pending until investigation completion
  • Engage professional counseling support for affected employees
  • Review and strengthen existing anti-harassment policies

Best Practice Reference: Similar to Vishakha Guidelines implementation, companies like Infosys have demonstrated that zero-tolerance policies, when implemented fairly, enhance rather than diminish organizational performance by creating inclusive work environments.

This approach upholds both dharma (righteous duty) and practical governance, ensuring that exceptional performance never becomes a shield for unethical conduct while maintaining procedural fairness essential for organizational credibility.

Answer Length

Model answers may exceed the word limit for better clarity and depth. Use them as a guide, but always frame your final answer within the exam’s prescribed limit.

In just 60 sec

Evaluate your handwritten answer

  • Get detailed feedback
  • Model Answer after evaluation
Evaluate Now

Model Answers by Papers

Year-Wise Model Answer

Crack UPSC with your
Personal AI Mentor

An AI-powered ecosystem to learn, practice, and evaluate with discipline

SuperKalam
SuperKalam is your personal mentor for UPSC preparation, guiding you at every step of the exam journey.

Download the App

Get it on Google PlayDownload on the App Store
Follow us

ⓒ Snapstack Technologies Private Limited