Does the right to a clean environment entail legal regulation on burning crackers during Diwali? Discuss in the light of Article 21 of the Indian Constitution and judgements of the apex in this regard.
Does the right to a clean environment entail legal regulation on burning crackers during Diwali? Discuss in the light of Article 21 of the Indian Constitution and judgements of the apex in this regard.
Recent Supreme Court interventions and rising pollution levels during festive seasons highlight the critical balance between environmental protection and cultural practices under India's constitutional framework.
Article 21 and Environmental Rights
- Expansive Interpretation: Supreme Court has evolved Article 21 from mere survival to include right to live with dignity in a pollution-free environment
- Judicial Precedents:
- MC Mehta vs Union of India (1987): Established environmental protection as fundamental right
- Subhash Kumar vs State of Bihar (1991): Right to pollution-free water and air integral to Article 21
- T.N. Godavarman vs Union of India: Continuous mandamus for environmental protection
- Constitutional Mandate: Article 48A (DPSP) and Article 51A(g) create state and citizen duties for environmental protection
- Life with Dignity: Court emphasized that meaningful life requires clean air, water, and environment
Supreme Court's Firecracker Regulations
- Arjun Gopal vs Union of India (2017): Landmark judgment allowing only green crackers during specified hours
- Time Restrictions: Bursting permitted only 8 PM-10 PM on Diwali and 6 AM-10 PM on other festivals
- Green Crackers: CSIR-developed crackers with 30% reduced emissions mandated
- Complete Ban Rejected: Court avoided blanket prohibition, balancing religious freedom with environmental concerns
- State Powers: Empowered state governments to impose stricter regulations based on local air quality
Implementation and Impact Assessment
| Parameter | Before Regulation | Post-2017 Judgment |
|---|---|---|
| Delhi AQI (Post-Diwali 2024) | Often >500 | 339 (Very Poor) |
| Cities with Severe AQI | Multiple cities | Zero cities in 2024 |
| Hospital Admissions | 40-60% spike | 20-30% spike |
- Enforcement Challenges: Inconsistent implementation across states, illegal firecracker sales persist
- Public Compliance: Gradual shift toward green crackers, though traditional crackers still dominate markets
- Health Benefits: Reduction in respiratory emergency cases, particularly among children and elderly
Balancing Rights and Cultural Practices
- Reasonable Restrictions: Court applied proportionality test under Article 19, allowing restrictions on manner of celebration, not celebration itself
- Cultural Sensitivity: Acknowledged Diwali's religious significance while prioritizing public health
- Alternative Solutions: Promoted laser shows, community celebrations, and eco-friendly alternatives
- Federal Approach: Allowed states flexibility based on local environmental conditions and AQI levels
- Constitutional Harmony: Balanced Article 25 (religious freedom) with Article 21 (right to life)
The Supreme Court's nuanced approach demonstrates that Article 21's right to clean environment does justify legal regulations on firecracker usage, establishing precedent for environmental protection over absolute cultural practices. Future regulations must continue balancing constitutional rights while prioritizing collective environmental health under the National Clean Air Programme.
Answer Length
Model answers may exceed the word limit for better clarity and depth. Use them as a guide, but always frame your final answer within the exam’s prescribed limit.
In just 60 sec
Evaluate your handwritten answer
- Get detailed feedback
- Model Answer after evaluation
Model Answers by Subject
Crack UPSC with your
Personal AI Mentor
An AI-powered ecosystem to learn, practice, and evaluate with discipline
