Score:
9.5/15
Analyze what earned this score 🔥
Topper’s Copy
GS2
SOCIAL_ISSUES_AND_SCHEMES
15 marks
“The replacement of MGNREGA with the Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) Bill, 2025 marks a shift from a rights-based welfare framework to a budget-driven approach.” Critically examine the implications of this shift for rural employment security and fiscal federalism in India.
Student’s Answer
Evaluation by SuperKalam
Demand of the Question
- Examine the implications of the shift from a rights-based welfare framework (MGNREGA) to a budget-driven approach (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission) for rural employment security.
- Examine the implications of the shift from a rights-based welfare framework (MGNREGA) to a budget-driven approach (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission) for fiscal federalism in India.
- Critically examine the shift, considering both positive and negative implications with a balanced analysis.
What you wrote:
The Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) [VB-G-RAM-G] Bill, 2025, replacing MGNREGA (2005), marks a shift from a rights based, demand driven model to a budgeted, tech-integrated, and centrally coordinated rural employment framework.
[DRAWING: A central bubble labeled "Structural Shift" has arrows pointing to five numbered points arranged around it.]
1. 125 Days guarantee: Expands employment from 100 to 125 days annually.
2. Agricultural pause: 60 days work suspension during sowing and harvest seasons.
3. Budget-capped-allocations: Replaces demand-based budgets with state-wise funding limits.
4. Tech integration: Biometric attendance, GPS monitoring, and AI based fraud detection.
5. Revised cost sharing: 60:40 for general state, 90:10 for hill/North East states.
The Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) [VB-G-RAM-G] Bill, 2025, replacing MGNREGA (2005), marks a shift from a rights based, demand driven model to a budgeted, tech-integrated, and centrally coordinated rural employment framework.
[DRAWING: A central bubble labeled "Structural Shift" has arrows pointing to five numbered points arranged around it.]
1. 125 Days guarantee: Expands employment from 100 to 125 days annually.
2. Agricultural pause: 60 days work suspension during sowing and harvest seasons.
3. Budget-capped-allocations: Replaces demand-based budgets with state-wise funding limits.
4. Tech integration: Biometric attendance, GPS monitoring, and AI based fraud detection.
5. Revised cost sharing: 60:40 for general state, 90:10 for hill/North East states.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could strengthen by briefly defining what "rights-based vs budget-driven" means (e.g., "rights-based ensures legal entitlement to work regardless of budget constraints, while budget-driven caps employment based on allocated funds").
What you wrote:
Implications for rural employment security
1. Loss of legal entitlement: Work contingent on Centre's fiscal approval.
2. Digital exclusion risk: Poor connectivity may exclude vulnerable workers.
3. Seasonal vulnerability: Agricultural pause may reduce wage continuity.
4. Gender concerns: Women's participation may reduce due to skill bias.
5. Implementation gaps: Historic shortfall of 45-55 days per household persists.
6. Targeted support: Weekly wage cycles and special cards improve inclusivity.
7. Skill diversification: Emphasis on upskilling may create semi-formal rural jobs.
Implications for rural employment security
1. Loss of legal entitlement: Work contingent on Centre's fiscal approval.
2. Digital exclusion risk: Poor connectivity may exclude vulnerable workers.
3. Seasonal vulnerability: Agricultural pause may reduce wage continuity.
4. Gender concerns: Women's participation may reduce due to skill bias.
5. Implementation gaps: Historic shortfall of 45-55 days per household persists.
6. Targeted support: Weekly wage cycles and special cards improve inclusivity.
7. Skill diversification: Emphasis on upskilling may create semi-formal rural jobs.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could examine wage payment mechanisms (e.g., direct benefit transfer reducing payment delays from average 50+ days under MGNREGA to proposed 7-day cycles)
- Could analyze impact on vulnerable groups more specifically (e.g., SC/ST workers who constitute 51% of MGNREGA beneficiaries may face barriers due to digital literacy requirements)
- Could discuss work availability during lean agricultural seasons when employment demand peaks
What you wrote:
Implications for fiscal federalism
1. State fiscal burden: Weaker states face higher cost pressure.
2. Reduced state autonomy: Centralized designs limit Panchayat planning flexibility.
3. Integration with Gati-Shakti: Aligns rural works with national infrastructure priorities.
4. Uneven capacity: Risk of development imbalance among states.
5. Equity challenge: Fiscal asymmetry could widen inter-state disparities.
6. Accountability shift: Centre gains greater control, reducing cooperative federalism.
7. Productivity gains: Durable, climate-resilient assets may enhance rural resilience.
Implications for fiscal federalism
1. State fiscal burden: Weaker states face higher cost pressure.
2. Reduced state autonomy: Centralized designs limit Panchayat planning flexibility.
3. Integration with Gati-Shakti: Aligns rural works with national infrastructure priorities.
4. Uneven capacity: Risk of development imbalance among states.
5. Equity challenge: Fiscal asymmetry could widen inter-state disparities.
6. Accountability shift: Centre gains greater control, reducing cooperative federalism.
7. Productivity gains: Durable, climate-resilient assets may enhance rural resilience.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could examine constitutional concerns (e.g., potential conflict with 73rd Amendment provisions giving Panchayats planning authority over rural employment schemes)
- Could analyze differential state impacts (e.g., states like Bihar and Jharkhand with higher MGNREGA demand may face severe budget constraints affecting 40+ million rural households)
- Could discuss Centre's increased control over fund allocation potentially undermining federal balance
What you wrote:
Way Forward
→ Retain rights framework within fiscal prudence.
→ Enhance digital access to prevent exclusion.
→ Promote fiscal equity for inclusive implementation.
The VB-G-RAM-G Bill, though risks diluting rights and federal balances with equitable, inclusive, and tech-sensitive governance reforms as aimed in bill aligning with Viksit Bharat-2047 and SDG-1 and 8, aims to provide inclusive rural livelihood and resilient infrastructure with sustainable growth through tech-driven empowerment.
Way Forward
→ Retain rights framework within fiscal prudence.
→ Enhance digital access to prevent exclusion.
→ Promote fiscal equity for inclusive implementation.
The VB-G-RAM-G Bill, though risks diluting rights and federal balances with equitable, inclusive, and tech-sensitive governance reforms as aimed in bill aligning with Viksit Bharat-2047 and SDG-1 and 8, aims to provide inclusive rural livelihood and resilient infrastructure with sustainable growth through tech-driven empowerment.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could propose specific mechanisms for balancing rights with fiscal prudence (e.g., hybrid model ensuring minimum 100 days as legal right with additional 25 days subject to budget availability)
- Could suggest strengthening federal consultation mechanisms (e.g., revitalizing Inter-State Council role in employment policy coordination similar to GST Council model)
Your answer demonstrates strong analytical skills with comprehensive coverage of both employment security and federalism dimensions. The visual representation and balanced examination of positive-negative implications show good understanding. However, strengthening the constitutional and wage security aspects would enhance the critical examination significantly.
Demand of the Question
- Examine the implications of the shift from a rights-based welfare framework (MGNREGA) to a budget-driven approach (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission) for rural employment security.
- Examine the implications of the shift from a rights-based welfare framework (MGNREGA) to a budget-driven approach (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission) for fiscal federalism in India.
- Critically examine the shift, considering both positive and negative implications with a balanced analysis.
What you wrote:
The Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) [VB-G-RAM-G] Bill, 2025, replacing MGNREGA (2005), marks a shift from a rights based, demand driven model to a budgeted, tech-integrated, and centrally coordinated rural employment framework.
[DRAWING: A central bubble labeled "Structural Shift" has arrows pointing to five numbered points arranged around it.]
1. 125 Days guarantee: Expands employment from 100 to 125 days annually.
2. Agricultural pause: 60 days work suspension during sowing and harvest seasons.
3. Budget-capped-allocations: Replaces demand-based budgets with state-wise funding limits.
4. Tech integration: Biometric attendance, GPS monitoring, and AI based fraud detection.
5. Revised cost sharing: 60:40 for general state, 90:10 for hill/North East states.
The Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) [VB-G-RAM-G] Bill, 2025, replacing MGNREGA (2005), marks a shift from a rights based, demand driven model to a budgeted, tech-integrated, and centrally coordinated rural employment framework.
[DRAWING: A central bubble labeled "Structural Shift" has arrows pointing to five numbered points arranged around it.]
1. 125 Days guarantee: Expands employment from 100 to 125 days annually.
2. Agricultural pause: 60 days work suspension during sowing and harvest seasons.
3. Budget-capped-allocations: Replaces demand-based budgets with state-wise funding limits.
4. Tech integration: Biometric attendance, GPS monitoring, and AI based fraud detection.
5. Revised cost sharing: 60:40 for general state, 90:10 for hill/North East states.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could strengthen by briefly defining what "rights-based vs budget-driven" means (e.g., "rights-based ensures legal entitlement to work regardless of budget constraints, while budget-driven caps employment based on allocated funds").
More Challenges
View All- View Challenge
GS3
Economy
12 Jan, 2026
“Public service broadcasters are increasingly being repositioned as enablers of the creator and orange economy.”
In this context, examine the significance of Prasar Bharati’s ‘Creator’s Corner’ initiative in promoting the creator economy in India. Discuss its potential implications for public broadcasting reforms, digital inclusion, and cultural economy. - View Challenge
GS3
Science & Technology
Yesterday
“Despite the availability of cost-effective preventive interventions, India continues to report a high burden of neural tube defects such as Spina Bifida.”
In this context, examine the role of pre-conceptional folic acid supplementation and food fortification in preventing Spina Bifida in India. Discuss the challenges in implementation and suggest policy measures to address them. - View Challenge
GS3
Environment & Ecology
10 Jan, 2026
“The debate over conservation of the Western Ghats reflects the tension between ecological sustainability and developmental priorities.”
In this context, critically examine the recommendations of the Western Ghats Expert Ecology Panel (WGEEP) and the Kasturirangan Committee, highlighting their implications for environmental governance in India.
