GS2
International Relations
15 marks
“The evolution of the U.S. National Security Strategy reflects a shift from partnership-based global leadership to conditional burden-sharing.” In this context, examine the implications of the 2025 U.S. National Security Strategy for India’s strategic autonomy and its role in the Indo-Pacific.
The changing orientation of the United States’ National Security Strategy (NSS) illustrates a deeper transformation in Washington’s understanding of global leadership and partnerships. In 2005, the U.S.–India relationship was built on a strategic vision that viewed India as a “responsible rising power” whose growth would contribute positively to global stability. This confidence-driven approach resulted in path-breaking initiatives such as the civil nuclear agreement and an explicit political commitment to assist India’s emergence as a major world power. The underlying assumption was that long-term partnership, not transactional cooperation, would strengthen the international order.
The 2025 NSS reflects a marked departure from this philosophy. It emphasises national reassurance, inward consolidation, and the redistribution of security responsibilities to partners. Global leadership is increasingly framed as a burden to be managed rather than a normative responsibility. Within this framework, India is viewed less as a civilizational actor with independent agency and more as a strategic variable within the U.S.’s China containment calculus. The expectation that partners should bear primary responsibility for regional security highlights the conditional and interest-based nature of future U.S. support.
For India, this shift has profound strategic implications. Strategic autonomy is no longer only a doctrinal preference but an operational necessity. While collaboration with the U.S. in the Indo-Pacific, defence cooperation, and emerging technologies remains beneficial, India must prepare for a geopolitical environment in which external support is limited and transactional.
India’s rise, therefore, will hinge on its own material capabilities, regional credibility, and diplomatic assertiveness. In a fragmented global order marked by power competition and uncertainty, India must craft a role aligned with its scale, interests, and civilizational temperament—engaging major powers pragmatically while retaining independent strategic judgement and long-term autonomy.
GS3
Science & Technology
11 Jan, 2026
“Despite the availability of cost-effective preventive interventions, India continues to report a high burden of neural tube defects such as Spina Bifida.”
In this context, examine the role of pre-conceptional folic acid supplementation and food fortification in preventing Spina Bifida in India. Discuss the challenges in implementation and suggest policy measures to address them.
GS3
Environment & Ecology
Yesterday
“The debate over conservation of the Western Ghats reflects the tension between ecological sustainability and developmental priorities.”
In this context, critically examine the recommendations of the Western Ghats Expert Ecology Panel (WGEEP) and the Kasturirangan Committee, highlighting their implications for environmental governance in India.
GS3
Economy
9 Jan, 2026
“The introduction of Public–Private Partnership (PPP) model medical colleges in tribal districts marks a shift in India’s approach to healthcare capacity building.”
In this context, examine the rationale behind adopting the PPP model for medical education in tribal regions. Discuss its potential benefits and challenges in ensuring equity, quality of healthcare delivery, and public accountability.
Join thousands of aspirants mastering answer writing with daily challenges, instant AI evaluation, and topper copies