Score:
6.5/10
Analyze what earned this score 🔥
Topper’s Copy
GS2
Indian Polity
10 marks
Discuss the significance of the Supreme Court taking suo motu cognisance of digital arrest scams in protecting citizens’ rights.
Student’s Answer
Evaluation by SuperKalam
Demand of the Question
- Significance of Supreme Court's suo motu cognizance in digital arrest scam cases
- Protection of citizens' rights through this judicial intervention
- Impact on legal/institutional framework for cyber governance
What you wrote:
The Supreme Court's suo motu cognisance of digital arrest scams - where fraudsters impersonate police or CBI officers via video calls to extort money - reflects its constitutional duty to protect citizen's rights under Article - 14, 19, and 21.
[DRAWING: A flowchart is drawn with the following elements:
"Digital scams → Citizens threats → Supreme Court Sou motu → Institutional reform → Cyber trust and-protection → SDG-16 (Peace, Justice, and strong institutions)".]
The Supreme Court's suo motu cognisance of digital arrest scams - where fraudsters impersonate police or CBI officers via video calls to extort money - reflects its constitutional duty to protect citizen's rights under Article - 14, 19, and 21.
[DRAWING: A flowchart is drawn with the following elements:
"Digital scams → Citizens threats → Supreme Court Sou motu → Institutional reform → Cyber trust and-protection → SDG-16 (Peace, Justice, and strong institutions)".]
Suggestions to improve:
- Could strengthen by mentioning the Supreme Court's recent suo motu action in October 2025 following the ₹1.5 crore fraud case involving senior citizens, showing immediate relevance and judicial urgency.
What you wrote:
Significance for citizens rights protection
1) Right to dignity: Prevents humiliation and fear through fake detentions (eg Delhi NCR senior citizens targeted).
2) Right to privacy: Upholds Puttuswamy judgement by curbing illegal data use.
3) Procedural fairness: Reinforces BNSS, 2023 - ensuring legitimate law enforcement verification.
4) Psychological safety: Reduces anxiety caused by digital intimidation and online impersonation.
5) Public confidence: Reaffirms judiciary's role as guardian of citizens protection in digital governance.
Significance for citizens rights protection
1) Right to dignity: Prevents humiliation and fear through fake detentions (eg Delhi NCR senior citizens targeted).
2) Right to privacy: Upholds Puttuswamy judgement by curbing illegal data use.
3) Procedural fairness: Reinforces BNSS, 2023 - ensuring legitimate law enforcement verification.
4) Psychological safety: Reduces anxiety caused by digital intimidation and online impersonation.
5) Public confidence: Reaffirms judiciary's role as guardian of citizens protection in digital governance.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could add Right to Property protection (e.g., victims collectively lost nearly ₹3000 crore to digital arrest scams, violating Article 300A)
- Could mention judicial activism expanding beyond traditional boundaries (e.g., Supreme Court's proactive stance in cyber crimes reflects evolving constitutional interpretation)
What you wrote:
Strengthening Cyber Governance & Institutional Framework
1) Regulatory coordination: Mandates synergy among CERT-In, MHA, and State cyber cells.
2) Digital literacy: Encourages awareness via Cyber Surakshit Bharat initiative.
3) Technological vigilance: AI based call verification and blockchain IDs for police authentication.
4) Judicial oversight: Establishes monitoring framework for cyber fraud investigation.
5) Preventive infrastructure: Urges creation of national helpline and reporting portals.
Strengthening Cyber Governance & Institutional Framework
1) Regulatory coordination: Mandates synergy among CERT-In, MHA, and State cyber cells.
2) Digital literacy: Encourages awareness via Cyber Surakshit Bharat initiative.
3) Technological vigilance: AI based call verification and blockchain IDs for police authentication.
4) Judicial oversight: Establishes monitoring framework for cyber fraud investigation.
5) Preventive infrastructure: Urges creation of national helpline and reporting portals.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could discuss notices issued to Centre, CBI, states, and UTs showing comprehensive judicial oversight across federal structure
- Could mention standardization of investigation procedures (e.g., Court seeking details of FIRs registered, ensuring uniform response mechanism)
What you wrote:
Judicial intervention against digital arrest scams fortifies cyber ethics, citizen trust, and India's pursuit of inclusive digital justice aligned with SDG-16 and Viksit Bharat - 2047.
Judicial intervention against digital arrest scams fortifies cyber ethics, citizen trust, and India's pursuit of inclusive digital justice aligned with SDG-16 and Viksit Bharat - 2047.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could strengthen by emphasizing precedent-setting nature (e.g., Supreme Court's intervention may establish new jurisprudence for cyber crimes, similar to its role in environmental protection through PIL mechanism).
Excellent constitutional understanding with strong rights-based analysis and comprehensive institutional framework discussion. The flowchart adds visual clarity. Consider strengthening with recent developments and enforcement mechanisms for complete coverage.
Demand of the Question
- Significance of Supreme Court's suo motu cognizance in digital arrest scam cases
- Protection of citizens' rights through this judicial intervention
- Impact on legal/institutional framework for cyber governance
What you wrote:
The Supreme Court's suo motu cognisance of digital arrest scams - where fraudsters impersonate police or CBI officers via video calls to extort money - reflects its constitutional duty to protect citizen's rights under Article - 14, 19, and 21.
[DRAWING: A flowchart is drawn with the following elements:
"Digital scams → Citizens threats → Supreme Court Sou motu → Institutional reform → Cyber trust and-protection → SDG-16 (Peace, Justice, and strong institutions)".]
The Supreme Court's suo motu cognisance of digital arrest scams - where fraudsters impersonate police or CBI officers via video calls to extort money - reflects its constitutional duty to protect citizen's rights under Article - 14, 19, and 21.
[DRAWING: A flowchart is drawn with the following elements:
"Digital scams → Citizens threats → Supreme Court Sou motu → Institutional reform → Cyber trust and-protection → SDG-16 (Peace, Justice, and strong institutions)".]
Suggestions to improve:
- Could strengthen by mentioning the Supreme Court's recent suo motu action in October 2025 following the ₹1.5 crore fraud case involving senior citizens, showing immediate relevance and judicial urgency.
More Challenges
View All- View Challenge
GS2
Indian Polity
29 Nov, 2025
Critically examine the Election Commission’s stance on simultaneous elections in India, especially with reference to the basic structure doctrine and election-related institutional mechanisms.
- View Challenge
GS2
Governance
Yesterday
Critically examine the limitations of the POSH Act in addressing sexual harassment in educational institutions, especially in cases involving power imbalance and emotional manipulation. Suggest reforms.
- View Challenge
GS2
Indian Polity
27 Nov, 2025
With the rise of deepfake technologies and AI-generated content, discuss the challenges they pose to personality rights in India. Evaluate the adequacy of existing legal frameworks and suggest measures to ensure stronger protection.
