Score:
9/15
Analyze what earned this score 🔥
Topper’s Copy
GS2
International Relations
15 marks
Q. The recent U.S. strike on Venezuela has been
described as a revival of the "Monroe Doctrine" in
contemporary geopolitics.
In this context, examine the relevance of the Monroe
Doctrine in the 21st century and discuss the implications
of such interventions on sovereignty and regional
stability in Latin America.
Student’s Answer
Evaluation by SuperKalam
Demand of the Question
- Examine relevance of Monroe Doctrine in 21st century - evolution, contemporary application
- Discuss implications on sovereignty - legal, political impacts of interventions
- Discuss implications on regional stability - effects on Latin American regional dynamics
- Context of US-Venezuela action - connecting recent events to broader doctrine
What you wrote:
The recent US action against Venezuela is seen as revival of Monroe doctrine (1823), which opposed European interference and asserted US primacy in Western Hemisphere.
The recent US action against Venezuela is seen as revival of Monroe doctrine (1823), which opposed European interference and asserted US primacy in Western Hemisphere.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could strengthen by briefly defining what constitutes the "recent US strike" and mentioning the doctrine's core principle of "America for Americans" to provide clearer historical grounding.
What you wrote:
Relevance of Monroe Doctrine in 21st Century:
1. Original intent-
-> Prevent European recolonisation in the Americas
-> Establish US Sphere of influence.
2. Contemporary interpretation
-> Countering regional powers like China and Russia in Latin America
-> Protecting US strategic and security interest
3. Economic - Strategic dominance:
-> Venezuela's largest proven crude oil reserves,
-> Energy security
4. Nature of transformation
-> Shift from Anti-Colonial principle to hegemonic interventions in a multi-polar world.
Relevance of Monroe Doctrine in 21st Century:
1. Original intent-
-> Prevent European recolonisation in the Americas
-> Establish US Sphere of influence.
2. Contemporary interpretation
-> Countering regional powers like China and Russia in Latin America
-> Protecting US strategic and security interest
3. Economic - Strategic dominance:
-> Venezuela's largest proven crude oil reserves,
-> Energy security
4. Nature of transformation
-> Shift from Anti-Colonial principle to hegemonic interventions in a multi-polar world.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could examine specific instances like US opposition to China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) projects in Latin America (e.g., concerns over Chinese investments in Panama Canal, ports in Peru)
- Can discuss recent US initiatives like "America Crece" program launched to counter Chinese economic influence in the region
- Could analyze how Russia's military cooperation with Nicaragua and Cuba represents the type of external influence the doctrine traditionally opposed
What you wrote:
Impact of National Sovereignty:
1. Violation of Sovereignty:
-> Unilateral intervention undermines political independence of states
2. International law concerns:
-> Breach of Article 2(4) of UN Charter
-> Absence of UN Security Council authorisation
3. Power asymmetry:
-> Smaller Latin American states unable to counter U.S dominance.
4. Strategic dependence:
-> States seek support from China/Russia, increasing external influence
Impact of National Sovereignty:
1. Violation of Sovereignty:
-> Unilateral intervention undermines political independence of states
2. International law concerns:
-> Breach of Article 2(4) of UN Charter
-> Absence of UN Security Council authorisation
3. Power asymmetry:
-> Smaller Latin American states unable to counter U.S dominance.
4. Strategic dependence:
-> States seek support from China/Russia, increasing external influence
Suggestions to improve:
- Can include specific examples like US sanctions on Venezuelan officials and state-owned enterprises affecting domestic governance
- Could mention recognition of Juan Guaidó as interim president by US and allies, bypassing Venezuela's constitutional processes
- Can discuss how economic sanctions impact civilian population, raising humanitarian concerns
What you wrote:
Impact on Regional Stability in Latin America:
1. Political polarisation:
-> Division among Latin American Countries -- U.S Aligned v/s China/Russia Aligned
2. Diplomatic tensions:
-> Reduced trust and cooperation within the region.
3. Militarisation and proxy risks:
-> Arms build up and external involvement in local conflicts
4. Economic disruption:
-> Trade, investment, and energy flows affected
5. Institutional weakening
-> OAS and CELAC are meant to ensure regional cooperation, but US interventions weaken their effectiveness.
Impact on Regional Stability in Latin America:
1. Political polarisation:
-> Division among Latin American Countries -- U.S Aligned v/s China/Russia Aligned
2. Diplomatic tensions:
-> Reduced trust and cooperation within the region.
3. Militarisation and proxy risks:
-> Arms build up and external involvement in local conflicts
4. Economic disruption:
-> Trade, investment, and energy flows affected
5. Institutional weakening
-> OAS and CELAC are meant to ensure regional cooperation, but US interventions weaken their effectiveness.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could examine divisions within OAS over Venezuela crisis, with countries like Mexico and Uruguay opposing intervention while Colombia and Brazil initially supported US position
- Can discuss formation of alternative regional blocs like PROSUR as response to US influence in traditional organizations
- Could mention increased Chinese and Russian military presence (e.g., Russian military advisors in Venezuela, Chinese loans for infrastructure projects)
What you wrote:
While the Monroe doctrine continues to shape U.S strategic thinking, its 21st century application raises concerns regarding sovereignty, regional stability. Sustainable peace in Latin America requires rule-based, multilateral approach rather than unilateral intervention.
While the Monroe doctrine continues to shape U.S strategic thinking, its 21st century application raises concerns regarding sovereignty, regional stability. Sustainable peace in Latin America requires rule-based, multilateral approach rather than unilateral intervention.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could strengthen by referencing India's position on non-interference and respect for sovereignty as outlined in Panchsheel principles, showing how alternative diplomatic approaches might address regional challenges more effectively.
The answer demonstrates good structural organization and covers all major demands. However, it needs more specific contemporary examples and deeper analysis of how the Monroe Doctrine operates in today's multipolar world context.
Demand of the Question
- Examine relevance of Monroe Doctrine in 21st century - evolution, contemporary application
- Discuss implications on sovereignty - legal, political impacts of interventions
- Discuss implications on regional stability - effects on Latin American regional dynamics
- Context of US-Venezuela action - connecting recent events to broader doctrine
What you wrote:
The recent US action against Venezuela is seen as revival of Monroe doctrine (1823), which opposed European interference and asserted US primacy in Western Hemisphere.
The recent US action against Venezuela is seen as revival of Monroe doctrine (1823), which opposed European interference and asserted US primacy in Western Hemisphere.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could strengthen by briefly defining what constitutes the "recent US strike" and mentioning the doctrine's core principle of "America for Americans" to provide clearer historical grounding.
More Challenges
View All- View Challenge
GS3
AGRICULTURE
Yesterday
Discuss how advancements in seed technology and public sector institutions contribute to agricultural productivity and farmers’ income in India.
- View Challenge
GS2
International Relations
5 Jan, 2026
“The recent U.S. military action against Venezuela has reopened debates on sovereignty, intervention, and the limits of unilateral action in international relations.”
Discuss the stated justifications of the United States and critically examine the implications of such actions for international law and global order. - View Challenge
GS3
Economy
4 Jan, 2026
Discuss the role of institutional mechanisms such as the Board of Trade (BoT), Market Access Initiative, and Export Promotion Mission in addressing exporters’ concerns and enhancing India’s export competitiveness.
