Score:
6/10
Analyze what earned this score 🔥
Topper’s Copy
GS2
International Relations
10 marks
“The recent U.S. military action against Venezuela has reopened debates on sovereignty, intervention, and the limits of unilateral action in international relations.”
Discuss the stated justifications of the United States and critically examine the implications of such actions for international law and global order.
Student’s Answer
Evaluation by SuperKalam
Demand of the Question
- Stated justifications of the US for military action against Venezuela
- Critical examination of implications for international law
- Impact on global order from such unilateral actions
- Analysis of sovereignty vs intervention debate in contemporary context
What you wrote:
Despite Venezuela's 300-billion barrel oil reserves, recent U.S. military actions citing security and narcotics concerns have revived debates on sovereignty and unilateral intervention.
Despite Venezuela's 300-billion barrel oil reserves, recent U.S. military actions citing security and narcotics concerns have revived debates on sovereignty and unilateral intervention.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could specify the nature and timeline of the military actions being discussed (e.g., sanctions enforcement, naval operations, or support to opposition groups)
- Can establish the broader geopolitical context by mentioning the ongoing crisis under Maduro's regime and regional implications
What you wrote:
The stated justification of the US
1. Counter narcotics: Venezuela alleged as a major cocaine transit route to North America.
2. Migration Pressure: 7.7 million Venezuelan migrants (UNHCR, 2024) straining regional stability.
3. Security Concerns: Presence of non-state actor invoked to justify self defence under Article 51.
4. Order maintenance: claimed protection of hemispheric and rules-based security order.
The stated justification of the US
1. Counter narcotics: Venezuela alleged as a major cocaine transit route to North America.
2. Migration Pressure: 7.7 million Venezuelan migrants (UNHCR, 2024) straining regional stability.
3. Security Concerns: Presence of non-state actor invoked to justify self defence under Article 51.
4. Order maintenance: claimed protection of hemispheric and rules-based security order.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could include humanitarian justification citing Venezuela's economic collapse and human rights violations under Maduro's regime
- Can mention democracy promotion arguments, referencing US support for Juan Guaidó's interim presidency recognition
- Could elaborate on the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine that US often invokes in such interventions
What you wrote:
Implications of such actions are:
1. Violation of Article 2(4): Use of force without UN Security Council authorisation.
2. Weak self defence claim: Absence of an armed attack undermines Article 51 justification.
3. Unilateralism: Sidestepping multilateral institutions erodes international legitimacy.
4. Precedent risk: Normalises power centric interventions by major states.
5. Global order impact: Weakens sovereign equality and non-intervention norms.
Implications of such actions are:
1. Violation of Article 2(4): Use of force without UN Security Council authorisation.
2. Weak self defence claim: Absence of an armed attack undermines Article 51 justification.
3. Unilateralism: Sidestepping multilateral institutions erodes international legitimacy.
4. Precedent risk: Normalises power centric interventions by major states.
5. Global order impact: Weakens sovereign equality and non-intervention norms.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could examine impact on Monroe Doctrine revival and Latin American regional autonomy
- Can discuss how such actions affect Organization of American States (OAS) and regional consensus-building
- Could mention the Contadora Group principles and Latin American opposition to external intervention
- Can analyze how this affects CELAC (Community of Latin American and Caribbean States) unity and regional governance
What you wrote:
Upholding peace requires UN centred multilateralism, legal restraint and collective security, strengthening international law, stable global governance, and the SDG 16 vision of peaceful institutions.
Upholding peace requires UN centred multilateralism, legal restraint and collective security, strengthening international law, stable global governance, and the SDG 16 vision of peaceful institutions.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could emphasize India's position on strategic autonomy and non-interference principles as an alternative approach
- Can mention the need for reformed multilateral institutions that better represent Global South perspectives in conflict resolution
Strong legal analysis and systematic approach, but missed regional implications and humanitarian intervention aspects. The answer demonstrates good understanding of international law but could benefit from broader geopolitical context and regional perspectives.
Demand of the Question
- Stated justifications of the US for military action against Venezuela
- Critical examination of implications for international law
- Impact on global order from such unilateral actions
- Analysis of sovereignty vs intervention debate in contemporary context
What you wrote:
Despite Venezuela's 300-billion barrel oil reserves, recent U.S. military actions citing security and narcotics concerns have revived debates on sovereignty and unilateral intervention.
Despite Venezuela's 300-billion barrel oil reserves, recent U.S. military actions citing security and narcotics concerns have revived debates on sovereignty and unilateral intervention.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could specify the nature and timeline of the military actions being discussed (e.g., sanctions enforcement, naval operations, or support to opposition groups)
- Can establish the broader geopolitical context by mentioning the ongoing crisis under Maduro's regime and regional implications
More Challenges
View All- View Challenge
GS3
Economy
Yesterday
Discuss the role of institutional mechanisms such as the Board of Trade (BoT), Market Access Initiative, and Export Promotion Mission in addressing exporters’ concerns and enhancing India’s export competitiveness.
- View Challenge
GS1
Economy
3 Jan, 2026
“The Vande Bharat sleeper train marks a significant shift in India’s railway modernisation by combining indigenous technology, safety systems and passenger-centric design.”
Examine the statement with reference to the features of the Vande Bharat sleeper trains and their role in strengthening India’s transport infrastructure. - View Challenge
GS1
Art & Culture
2 Jan, 2026
“The stitched shipbuilding system reflects India’s indigenous technological ingenuity and adaptive maritime knowledge.”
Discuss the key features of the traditional Indian stitched shipbuilding system and evaluate its relevance in the context of modern maritime practices.
