Score:
5/10
Analyze what earned this score 🔥
Topper’s Copy
GS3
Economy
10 marks
Explain the significance of the new horizontal devolution criteria introduced by the 16th Finance Commission.
How does the inclusion of “contribution to GDP” alter inter-state fiscal transfers?
Student’s Answer
Evaluation by SuperKalam
Demand of the Question
- Significance of new horizontal devolution criteria by 16th Finance Commission
- Impact of "contribution to GDP" inclusion on inter-state fiscal transfers
What you wrote:
→ The new horizontal criteria of 16th Finance Commission signify a shift towards recognizing states' economic performance, with the inclusion of 'contribution to GDP' likely altering interstate fiscal transfers to potentially favour more economically viable states.
→ The new horizontal criteria of 16th Finance Commission signify a shift towards recognizing states' economic performance, with the inclusion of 'contribution to GDP' likely altering interstate fiscal transfers to potentially favour more economically viable states.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could strengthen with specific mention of the Finance Commission's constitutional mandate under Article 280 to provide clearer context for the significance of this change.
What you wrote:
→ The introduction of 'contribution to GDP' as new criteria for determining horizontal distribution of central tax revenues among the states, marks a significant departure from previous commissions' primary focus on 'Need' (Population, area), & 'equity' (income distance). The significance lies in creating incentive for states to boost their economic output & efficiency.
→ The introduction of 'contribution to GDP' as new criteria for determining horizontal distribution of central tax revenues among the states, marks a significant departure from previous commissions' primary focus on 'Need' (Population, area), & 'equity' (income distance). The significance lies in creating incentive for states to boost their economic output & efficiency.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could elaborate on constitutional and federal implications (e.g., how this aligns with competitive federalism principles promoted since 14th Finance Commission's tax devolution increase from 32% to 42%)
- Could mention significance for fiscal discipline (e.g., encouraging states to improve tax-GDP ratios and reduce fiscal deficits)
- Could discuss administrative efficiency incentives (e.g., states improving ease of doing business rankings to attract investment)
What you wrote:
The inclusion of this factor is expected to alter interstate fiscal transfers, by potentially increasing the share of states with higher GDP contributions, typically the more industrialized Southern & Western states.
The inclusion of this factor is expected to alter interstate fiscal transfers, by potentially increasing the share of states with higher GDP contributions, typically the more industrialized Southern & Western states.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could provide context on current disparities (e.g., Tamil Nadu contributes ~8.5% to national GDP but receives only ~4.2% of central tax transfers)
- Could discuss potential constitutional challenges (e.g., concerns about violating federal equity principles under Article 1)
- Could mention transition safeguards (e.g., gradual implementation over 5-year period to prevent fiscal shock to dependent states)
What you wrote:
Conversely, this may lead to a relative decrease in share for some northern & eastern states, which have historically relied more heavily on fiscal transfers based on backwardness or population criteria.
The criteria seek to balance redistributive justice with economic efficiency, aiming for both equity & growth incentives.
Conversely, this may lead to a relative decrease in share for some northern & eastern states, which have historically relied more heavily on fiscal transfers based on backwardness or population criteria.
The criteria seek to balance redistributive justice with economic efficiency, aiming for both equity & growth incentives.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could strengthen by suggesting specific mechanisms for achieving this balance (e.g., weighted approach where GDP contribution gets 15-20% weightage alongside traditional criteria, or performance-linked grants for backward states to build capacity).
Your answer demonstrates solid conceptual understanding of the policy shift and its implications. However, it could benefit from more specific examples, quantitative context, and deeper exploration of implementation mechanisms to fully address both demands of the question.
Demand of the Question
- Significance of new horizontal devolution criteria by 16th Finance Commission
- Impact of "contribution to GDP" inclusion on inter-state fiscal transfers
What you wrote:
→ The new horizontal criteria of 16th Finance Commission signify a shift towards recognizing states' economic performance, with the inclusion of 'contribution to GDP' likely altering interstate fiscal transfers to potentially favour more economically viable states.
→ The new horizontal criteria of 16th Finance Commission signify a shift towards recognizing states' economic performance, with the inclusion of 'contribution to GDP' likely altering interstate fiscal transfers to potentially favour more economically viable states.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could strengthen with specific mention of the Finance Commission's constitutional mandate under Article 280 to provide clearer context for the significance of this change.
More Challenges
View All- View Challenge
GS3
Economy
Yesterday
Explain the constitutional and institutional framework of the Union Budget in India. Highlight the role of different Budget documents in ensuring parliamentary control over public finance.
- View Challenge
GS2
Indian Polity
1 Feb, 2026
“In the digital age, Article 21 of the Indian Constitution has expanded from a negative right against State interference to a positive obligation on the State to ensure dignity, access, and inclusion.”
Discuss in the light of recent judicial pronouncements. - View Challenge
GS3
Economy
31 Jan, 2026
“The Economic Survey 2025–26 argues that India’s future growth and macroeconomic stability depend more on building manufacturing competitiveness and external resilience than on short-term macroeconomic management.”
Critically examine.
