Subject: Indian Polity

The right to privacy, recognized as a fundamental right through the landmark Justice K.S. Puttaswamy case (2017), has become increasingly significant in the era of technological advancement and genetic testing. The Supreme Court's interpretation of Article 21 has evolved to encompass various dimensions of personal liberty, including privacy and bodily autonomy.

Right to Privacy under Article 21

• Constitutional Protection: Article 21 protects life and personal liberty, with privacy being recognized as its intrinsic component through judicial interpretation.

• Three-fold Test: The Supreme Court established that any invasion of privacy must satisfy the requirements of:

  • Legality: Having basis in law.
  • Necessity: Legitimate state aim.
  • Proportionality: Rational nexus between means and ends.

DNA Testing and Privacy Rights

• Legal Framework: Currently, India lacks comprehensive legislation for DNA testing, though the DNA Technology (Use and Application) Regulation Bill, 2019 aims to establish regulatory mechanisms.

• Judicial Approach: Courts have balanced privacy rights with:

  • Right to know genetic lineage.
  • Best interests of the child.
  • Public interest in justice administration.

DNA Testing for Paternity

• Consent Requirements:

  • Mother's explicit consent required for prenatal DNA testing.
  • Courts can order testing if substantial public interest exists.

• Safeguards and Limitations:

  • DNA Regulatory Board proposed to oversee testing procedures.
  • Strict protocols for sample collection and data protection.
  • Restricted access to genetic information.

Challenges and Concerns

• Privacy Issues:
  • Risk of unauthorized access to genetic data.
  • Potential misuse of sensitive information.
  • Need for robust data protection mechanisms.
• Balance must be sought between Mother's Right to Privacy, Child’s Right to Identity, and Father's Right to Know.

The right to privacy under Article 21 is a sacrosanct part of Indian constitutional law, protecting personal choices, bodily autonomy, and reproductive rights. In matters like DNA testing of an unborn child, this right must be delicately balanced against legitimate state interests and the quest for truth.