The Indian Constitution exhibits centralizing tendencies to maintain unity and integrity of the nation. Elucidate in the perspective of the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897; The Disaster Management Act, 2005 and recently passed Farm Acts.
The Indian Constitution exhibits centralizing tendencies to maintain unity and integrity of the nation. Elucidate in the perspective of the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897; The Disaster Management Act, 2005 and recently passed Farm Acts.
The Indian Constitution's centralizing tendencies reflect the framers' priority to maintain national unity while addressing extraordinary circumstances through enhanced Union government control.
Constitutional Framework for Centralization
- Article 352 (National Emergency) and Article 356 (President's Rule) provide constitutional basis for centralized control during crises
- Seventh Schedule demonstrates Union bias with 97 subjects in Union List versus 66 in State List
- Article 248 (Residuary Powers) vests remaining subjects with the Union government
- Article 356 enables direct Union intervention in state governance during constitutional breakdown
- Emergency provisions suspend normal federal distribution, concentrating power at the center
Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897: Central Health Control
- Colonial Legacy: Originally enacted to combat plague, retained post-independence for centralized disease control
- COVID-19 Implementation: Union government used Act to impose nationwide lockdowns, bypassing state consultation
- Constitutional Validation: Supreme Court upheld central powers under Entry 29 (Union List) - prevention of inter-state disease spread
- State Subordination: State governments reduced to implementing central directives rather than autonomous decision-making
- Recent Amendment (2022): Enhanced penalties and central oversight mechanisms further strengthened Union control
Disaster Management Act, 2005: Hierarchical Crisis Response
| Aspect | Central Control | State Role |
|---|---|---|
| Leadership | NDMA under PM | SDMA under CM |
| Policy Making | National guidelines binding on states | Implementation of central policies |
| Resource Allocation | NDRF controlled centrally | State forces under central coordination |
| Decision Authority | Final say on disaster classification | Limited autonomous response |
- National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) under PM's chairmanship creates top-down command structure
- National Disaster Response Force (NDRF) operates under central control, deployable without state consent
- Calamity Relief Fund distribution subject to central approval and guidelines
- Recent Cyclone Amphan (2020) response demonstrated effective but centralized coordination
Farm Acts 2020: Federal Overreach and Rollback
- Constitutional Justification: Used Entry 33 (Concurrent List) - trade and commerce to override state APMC laws
- Punjab and Haryana Response: States passed contradictory legislation, highlighting federal tensions
- Supreme Court Intervention: Stayed implementation citing lack of adequate consultation with states
- December 2021 Repeal: Acknowledged federal concerns and need for cooperative federalism
- Lesson Learned: Demonstrated limits of centralization in constitutionally federal subjects
Balancing Unity and Federalism
- Inter-State Council revival recommended by 15th Finance Commission for better federal consultation
- Cooperative Federalism: Recent initiatives like GST Council show collaborative approaches work better
- Emergency vs. Normal Times: Centralization justified during crises but requires federal balance otherwise
- Constitutional Morality: Bommai Judgment (1994) established limits on Article 356 misuse
- Way Forward: Strengthen Zonal Councils and institutionalize regular Centre-State dialogue
The Constitution's centralizing features serve national integration effectively during emergencies, but sustainable governance requires balancing Union authority with federal principles through institutions like the NITI Aayog and enhanced cooperative mechanisms.
Answer Length
Model answers may exceed the word limit for better clarity and depth. Use them as a guide, but always frame your final answer within the exam’s prescribed limit.
Indian Polity PYQs from 2020
- 15 MarksView Answer
Which steps are required for constitutionalisation of a commission? Do you think imparting constitutionality to the national commission for women would ensure greater gender justice and empowerment in India? Give reasons.
- 15 MarksView Answer
Rajyasabha has been transformed from a ‘useless Stepney tire’ to the most useful supportive organ in the past few decades. Highlight the factors as well as areas in which this transformation could be visible.
- 15 MarksView Answer
The strength and sustenance of local institutions in India has shifted from their formative phase of ‘functions, functionaries and funds’ to the contemporary stage of’ functionality’. Highlight the critical challenges faced by local institutions in terms of their functionality in recent times.
- 15 MarksView Answer
Judicial legislation is antithetical to the doctrine of separation of powers as envisaged in the Indian Constitution. In this context justify the filing of a large number of public interest petitions praying for issuing guidelines to executive authorities.
- 10 MarksView Answer
Once a speaker, Always a speaker’! Do you think the practice should be adopted to impart objectivity to the office of the Speaker of Lok Sabha? What could be its implications for the robust functioning of parliamentary business in India.
- 10 MarksView Answer
The judicial systems in India and the UK seem to be converging as well as diverging in recent times. Highlight the key points of convergence and divergence between the two nations in terms of their judicial practices.
In just 60 sec
Evaluate your handwritten answer
- Get detailed feedback
- Model Answer after evaluation
Model Answers by Subject
Crack UPSC with your
Personal AI Mentor
An AI-powered ecosystem to learn, practice, and evaluate with discipline
