A big corporate house is engaged in manufacturing industrial chemicals on a large scale. It proposes to set upon the additional unit. Many states rejected its proposal due to the detrimental effect on the environment. But one state government acceded to the request and permitted the unit close to a city, brushing aside all opposition.The unit was set up 10 years ago and was in full swing till recently. The pollution caused by the industrial effluents was affecting the land, water and crops in the area. It was also causing serious health problems to human beings and animals. This gave rise to a series of agitation thousands of people took part, creating a law and order problem necessitating stern police action. Following the public outcry, the State government ordered the closure of the factory. The closure of the factory resulted in the unemployment of not only those workers who were engaged in the factory but also those who were working in the ancillary units. It also very badly affected those industry which depended on the chemicals manufactured by it. As a senior officer entrusted with the responsibility of handling this issues, how are you going to address it? (250 words)
A big corporate house is engaged in manufacturing industrial chemicals on a large scale. It proposes to set upon the additional unit. Many states rejected its proposal due to the detrimental effect on the environment. But one state government acceded to the request and permitted the unit close to a city, brushing aside all opposition.The unit was set up 10 years ago and was in full swing till recently. The pollution caused by the industrial effluents was affecting the land, water and crops in the area. It was also causing serious health problems to human beings and animals. This gave rise to a series of agitation thousands of people took part, creating a law and order problem necessitating stern police action. Following the public outcry, the State government ordered the closure of the factory. The closure of the factory resulted in the unemployment of not only those workers who were engaged in the factory but also those who were working in the ancillary units. It also very badly affected those industry which depended on the chemicals manufactured by it. As a senior officer entrusted with the responsibility of handling this issues, how are you going to address it? (250 words)
Introduction This case highlights the ethical dilemma of economic development versus environmental conservation, echoing the ongoing debate surrounding industrial pollution in India, particularly the recent concerns over air quality in Delhi, where utilitarianism clashes with the inherent right to a healthy environment. The central ethical dilemma lies in balancing the immediate economic benefits of the chemical plant with the long-term detrimental effects on the environment and public health, best addressed through the lens of sustainable development.
Stakeholder Identification Corporate house, State government, Local community (residents, farmers), Factory workers, Ancillary unit workers, Dependent industries, Animals, and the Environment.
Addressing the Issue
-
Immediate Remedial Measures: Provide immediate medical assistance to affected people and animals, demonstrating a commitment to public welfare and addressing the injustice caused. Initiate environmental remediation efforts (water purification, soil treatment) upholding the Polluter Pays Principle. This aligns with a utilitarian approach by maximizing well-being and minimizing harm.
-
Investigate and Establish Accountability: Conduct a thorough investigation to determine the extent of environmental damage and health impacts, ensuring transparency and upholding the Rule of Law. Hold the corporate house accountable for violating environmental regulations and causing harm, adhering to the principles of justice and fairness.
-
Economic Relief and Reskilling: Provide financial assistance and job retraining programs for displaced workers from the factory and ancillary units, mitigating the negative economic consequences and demonstrating a commitment to the common good. Explore alternative employment opportunities, such as promoting eco-friendly industries, fostering sustainable development.
-
Long-Term Solutions: Implement stricter environmental regulations and monitoring mechanisms for all industries in the state, preventing future instances of environmental damage and upholding the Public Trust Doctrine. This aligns with deontological ethics, emphasizing duty and adherence to rules. Promote sustainable industrial practices and green technologies, fostering long-term economic growth without compromising environmental integrity, reflecting a virtue ethics approach.
-
Public Awareness and Engagement: Conduct public awareness campaigns about environmental protection and sustainable development, empowering citizens to hold industries and governments accountable and fostering a sense of shared responsibility. This promotes the social contract between the government and its citizens.
Conclusion This case underscores the critical need for balancing economic development with environmental protection. The Bhopal Gas Tragedy serves as a stark reminder of the devastating consequences of prioritizing profit over public safety and environmental well-being. Moving forward, a commitment to sustainable development, incorporating ethical considerations into industrial practices, and robust regulatory frameworks are essential to prevent similar situations. Empowering local communities to participate in environmental decision-making processes is crucial for ensuring a just and sustainable future.
Answer Length
Model answers may exceed the word limit for better clarity and depth. Use them as a guide, but always frame your final answer within the exam’s prescribed limit.
In just 60 sec
Evaluate your handwritten answer
- Get detailed feedback
- Model Answer after evaluation
Crack UPSC with your
Personal AI Mentor
An AI-powered ecosystem to learn, practice, and evaluate with discipline
