Explain the salient features of the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016. Do you think it is efficacious enough ‘to remove cascading effect of taxes and provide for the common national market for goods and services’?
Explain the salient features of the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016. Do you think it is efficacious enough ‘to remove cascading effect of taxes and provide for the common national market for goods and services’?
Subject: Indian Polity
The Constitution (101st Amendment) Act, 2016 marked a paradigm shift in India's indirect taxation system by introducing the Goods and Services Tax (GST), representing one of the most significant fiscal reforms since independence.
Key Features of the 101st Amendment Act
-
Constitutional Provisions: Added Article 279A establishing the GST Council as a constitutional body with Union Finance Minister as chairperson and state finance ministers as members.
-
Concurrent Powers: Empowered both Centre and States to levy GST on goods and services through Article 246A, promoting cooperative federalism.
-
Compensation Framework: Guaranteed compensation to states for revenue losses for first five years of GST implementation through GST Compensation Cess.
-
Institutional Framework: Created the GST Network (GSTN) as the technological backbone for tax administration and compliance.
Effectiveness in Achieving Objectives
Positive Outcomes
-
Unified Market: Successfully integrated India into 'One Nation, One Tax' system by replacing multiple indirect taxes like VAT, excise duty, and service tax.
-
Digital Transformation: The e-way bill system and input tax credit mechanism have improved tax compliance and reduced tax evasion.
-
Economic Growth: Post-GST implementation saw increased company registrations and accelerated industrial activity.
Challenges and Limitations
-
Complex Rate Structure: Multiple tax slabs (5%, 12%, 18%, 28%) contrary to the ideal of a simple tax structure.
-
Technical Issues: Initial glitches in GSTN portal and compliance procedures affected smooth implementation.
-
Revenue Concerns: Some states faced revenue shortfalls despite compensation mechanism.
Way Forward
-
Rate Rationalization: Need for fewer tax slabs to simplify the system further.
-
Enhanced Technology: Strengthening the digital infrastructure for seamless compliance.
-
Capacity Building: Regular training of stakeholders and awareness programs for better implementation.
The 101st Amendment has largely succeeded in creating a unified national market and reducing the cascading effect through Input Tax Credit mechanism. However, continuous reforms and simplification measures are needed to fully realize its objectives of creating an efficient and harmonized taxation system. Recent initiatives like e-invoicing and new return filing system demonstrate the evolution towards a more robust GST framework.
Answer Length
Model answers may exceed the word limit for better clarity and depth. Use them as a guide, but always frame your final answer within the exam’s prescribed limit.
In just 60 sec
Evaluate your handwritten answer
- Get detailed feedback
- Model Answer after evaluation
Crack UPSC with your
Personal AI Mentor
An AI-powered ecosystem to learn, practice, and evaluate with discipline
Start Now