Exercise of CAG’s powers in relation
to the accounts of the Union and the
States is derived from Article 149 of
the Indian Constitution. Discuss
whether an audit of the Government’s
policy implementation could amount
to overstepping its own (CAG)
jurisdiction.
Exercise of CAG’s powers in relation
to the accounts of the Union and the
States is derived from Article 149 of
the Indian Constitution. Discuss
whether an audit of the Government’s
policy implementation could amount
to overstepping its own (CAG)
jurisdiction.
Article 149 empowers the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) to audit Union and State accounts, but policy implementation audits raise important jurisdictional questions that require constitutional analysis.
Constitutional Framework Under Article 149
- Primary Mandate: Article 149 grants CAG powers to audit government accounts and prescribe audit forms
- Statutory Support: CAG's (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service) Act, 1971 elaborates comprehensive audit functions
- Supreme Court Validation: Association of Unified Teleservices Providers v. Union of India (2014) affirmed CAG's authority for performance audits
- Parliamentary Oversight: Article 151 mandates submission of audit reports to President/Governor for legislative scrutiny
- Constitutional Independence: Articles 148-151 ensure CAG's autonomy in audit functions
Arguments Against Policy Implementation Audit
- Separation of Powers: Policy formulation is executive prerogative; audit may blur constitutional boundaries
- Democratic Legitimacy: Elected executives make policy decisions; unelected CAG shouldn't evaluate policy wisdom
- Judicial Precedent: State of Kerala v. CAG (1998) emphasized CAG's role in financial propriety, not policy evaluation
- Administrative Overreach: Performance audits may encroach upon executive decision-making domain
- Political Neutrality: Policy audits risk drawing CAG into political controversies
Arguments Supporting Policy Implementation Audit
- 3E Framework: CAG examines Economy, Efficiency, and Effectiveness of policy execution, not policy merit
- Public Accountability: Performance audits ensure taxpayer money achieves intended outcomes
- Constitutional Duty: Article 149 empowers CAG to prescribe audit forms, including performance evaluation
- Parliamentary Tool: PAC relies on CAG reports for effective legislative oversight
- Recent Examples: CAG's 2G spectrum audit (2010) and coal block allocation audit (2014) exposed implementation failures
| Aspect | Within Jurisdiction | Overstepping Jurisdiction |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Implementation effectiveness | Policy wisdom/formulation |
| Approach | Objective measurement | Subjective evaluation |
| Scope | Financial propriety + performance | Political decision-making |
The CAG's policy implementation audits remain within constitutional bounds when focusing on execution efficiency rather than policy wisdom. This maintains democratic accountability while respecting the separation of powers principle established in the Constitution.
Answer Length
Model answers may exceed the word limit for better clarity and depth. Use them as a guide, but always frame your final answer within the exam’s prescribed limit.
In just 60 sec
Evaluate your handwritten answer
- Get detailed feedback
- Model Answer after evaluation
Model Answers by Subject
Crack UPSC with your
Personal AI Mentor
An AI-powered ecosystem to learn, practice, and evaluate with discipline
