There is also a point of view that Agricultural Produce Market Committees [APMCs) set up under the State Acts have not only impeded the development of agriculture but also have been the cause of food inflation in India. Critically examine.
There is also a point of view that Agricultural Produce Market Committees [APMCs) set up under the State Acts have not only impeded the development of agriculture but also have been the cause of food inflation in India. Critically examine.
Subject: Economy
India's Agricultural Produce Market Committees (APMCs), established under state laws to ensure fair agricultural trade practices, have become a subject of intense debate regarding their role in agricultural development and inflation dynamics.
Impact on Agricultural Development
Impediments to Growth:
- Monopolistic Practices: APMCs have created local monopolies through licensed traders and commission agents, restricting competition and market access for farmers.
- Infrastructure Deficiencies: Despite collecting substantial market fees, many APMCs lack modern storage facilities and quality testing equipment (only 7,057 regulated markets exist, with over 1,100 non-functional as of March 2024).
- Market Access Limitations: Farmers are often forced to sell within their designated APMC jurisdiction, limiting their ability to seek better prices in other markets.
Progressive Aspects:
- Price Discovery Mechanism: APMCs provide a structured platform for price discovery through auction systems.
- Digital Integration: Implementation of eNAM (electronic National Agriculture Market) has enhanced transparency and market connectivity.
- Basic Infrastructure: Provision of weighing, storage, and payment facilities at a centralized location.
Role in Food Inflation
Inflationary Factors:
- Multiple Intermediaries: The presence of numerous middlemen in APMC markets adds to transaction costs, pushing up final consumer prices.
- Cartelization: Licensed traders often form cartels, manipulating prices and creating artificial scarcity.
- High Market Fees: Multiple levies and charges (ranging from 2-8.5%) contribute to increased food prices.
Reform Initiatives:
- Model APMC Act: Promotes competition by allowing private markets and direct marketing.
- State-Level Reforms: Examples like Bihar's APMC repeal show mixed results - decreased paddy prices but increased maize prices due to enhanced competition.
- Digital Innovation: Integration of e-mandis and modern trading platforms to reduce intermediary costs.
Agricultural development and price stability require a balanced approach that preserves APMCs' beneficial aspects while addressing their structural inefficiencies. The way forward lies in implementing "One Nation, One Market" reforms, strengthening market infrastructure, and promoting competition through alternative marketing channels like Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs) and private markets.
Answer Length
Model answers may exceed the word limit for better clarity and depth. Use them as a guide, but always frame your final answer within the exam’s prescribed limit.
In just 60 sec
Evaluate your handwritten answer
- Get detailed feedback
- Model Answer after evaluation
Crack UPSC with your
Personal AI Mentor
An AI-powered ecosystem to learn, practice, and evaluate with discipline
Start Now