The Supreme Court of India keeps a check on the arbitrary power of the Parliament in amending the Constitution. Discuss critically.
The Supreme Court of India keeps a check on the arbitrary power of the Parliament in amending the Constitution. Discuss critically.
India's Supreme Court serves as a constitutional guardian, preventing Parliament from making arbitrary amendments that could undermine democracy and fundamental rights.
Supreme Court's Checking Mechanism
- Basic Structure Doctrine: Established in Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), prevents Parliament from altering Constitution's essential features through Article 368 amendments
- Judicial Review Power: Court examines constitutional amendments for compliance with fundamental principles like rule of law, separation of powers, and democratic governance
- Interpretative Role: Supreme Court clarifies constitutional provisions and ensures amendments don't violate citizens' fundamental rights
- Procedural Scrutiny: Reviews whether proper parliamentary procedures under Article 368 are followed during amendment process
- Federal Balance: Protects federal structure by preventing amendments that might centralize excessive power
Parliamentary Sovereignty vs. Judicial Control
| Parliamentary Position | Judicial Position |
|---|---|
| Elected body with democratic mandate | Constitutional guardian protecting basic structure |
| Article 368 provides amendment power | Judicial review prevents arbitrary changes |
| Represents people's will directly | Protects minority rights and constitutional values |
| Can respond to changing societal needs | Ensures constitutional continuity and stability |
Recent Judicial Interventions
- November 2024 Ruling: Supreme Court clarified Basic Structure doctrine applies only to constitutional amendments, not ordinary legislation
- Constitution (129th Amendment) Bill 2024: Court's examination of simultaneous elections proposal demonstrates ongoing vigilance
- December 2024 Parliamentary Debates: Two-day constitutional discussions highlight ongoing legislature-judiciary dialogue
- NJAC Judgment (2015): Court struck down 99th Amendment for violating judicial independence
Critical Assessment
Strengths of Judicial Check
- Prevents authoritarian tendencies and protects democratic institutions
- Maintains constitutional stability and rule of law
- Safeguards fundamental rights from majoritarian excess
Limitations and Concerns
- Judicial Overreach: Critics argue courts exceed constitutional mandate
- Democratic Deficit: Unelected judges overrule elected representatives
- Ambiguous Scope: Basic structure doctrine lacks clear definition, creating uncertainty
The Supreme Court's constitutional review function remains essential for India's democracy, ensuring Parliament's amendatory power serves constitutional values rather than political convenience.
Answer Length
Model answers may exceed the word limit for better clarity and depth. Use them as a guide, but always frame your final answer within the exam’s prescribed limit.
Indian Polity PYQs from 2013
- 10 MarksView Answer
‘A national Lokpal, however strong it may be, cannot resolve the problems of immorality in public affairs’. Discuss.
- 10 MarksView Answer
Discuss the recommendations of the 13th Finance Commission which have been a departure from the previous commissions for strengthening the local government finances.
- 10 MarksView Answer
Constitutional mechanisms to resolve the inter-state water disputes have failed to address and solve the problems. Is the failure due to structural or process inadequacy or both? Discuss.
- 10 MarksView Answer
Recent directives from the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas are perceived by the ‘Nagas’ as a threat to override the exceptional status enjoyed by the State. Discuss in light of Article 371A of the Indian Constitution.
- 10 MarksView Answer
Discuss Section 66A of the IT Act, with reference to its alleged violation of Article 19 of the Constitution.
- 10 MarksView Answer
The role of individual MPs (Members of Parliament) has diminished over the years and as a result, healthy constructive debates on policy issues are not usually witnessed. How far can this be attributed to the anti-defection law, which was legislated but with a different intention?
In just 60 sec
Evaluate your handwritten answer
- Get detailed feedback
- Model Answer after evaluation
Model Answers by Subject
Crack UPSC with your
Personal AI Mentor
An AI-powered ecosystem to learn, practice, and evaluate with discipline

