The Central Government frequently complains about the poor performance of the State Governments in eradicating the suffering of the vulnerable sections of the society. Restructuring of Centrally sponsored schemes across the sectors for ameliorating the cause of vulnerable sections of the population aims at providing flexibility to the States in better implementation. Critically evaluate.
The Central Government frequently complains about the poor performance of the State Governments in eradicating the suffering of the vulnerable sections of the society. Restructuring of Centrally sponsored schemes across the sectors for ameliorating the cause of vulnerable sections of the population aims at providing flexibility to the States in better implementation. Critically evaluate.
Recent CSS restructuring initiatives aim to address persistent implementation gaps in welfare schemes, with states like Kerala achieving 95% coverage in social security while others lag below 60%, highlighting the need for flexible, state-specific approaches.
Benefits of CSS Restructuring
-
Scheme Rationalization: Reduction from 66 to 30 schemes eliminated overlapping programs and simplified administrative processes for better coordination.
-
Enhanced State Autonomy: States can now adapt schemes to local conditions, as seen in MGNREGA's state-specific wage rates and Tamil Nadu's innovative work categories.
-
Financial Flexibility: Flexi-funds (up to 25%) allow states to address emerging needs and local priorities within broader scheme objectives.
-
Outcome-Based Approach: Shift from input-based to outcome-based monitoring enables focus on actual impact rather than mere expenditure.
-
Reduced Administrative Burden: Umbrella schemes like Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojana consolidate multiple agriculture schemes, reducing paperwork and delays.
Implementation Challenges
-
Capacity Constraints: Many states lack adequate institutional infrastructure and trained personnel for effective scheme management and monitoring.
-
Funding Delays: States frequently complain about delayed central releases and burden of matching contributions, affecting timely implementation.
-
Political Differences: Center-state political misalignment often leads to poor coordination and blame-shifting rather than collaborative problem-solving.
-
Monitoring Gaps: Weak data collection systems and absence of real-time tracking mechanisms hamper effective performance assessment.
-
Beneficiary Targeting: Poor identification processes and outdated databases lead to exclusion errors, particularly affecting SC/ST and marginalized communities.
| Aspect | Before Restructuring | After Restructuring |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Schemes | 66 scattered schemes | 30 rationalized schemes |
| State Flexibility | Limited adaptation | 25% flexi-fund provision |
| Monitoring Focus | Input-based tracking | Outcome-based assessment |
Way Forward
-
Institutional Strengthening: Building state capacity through National Institute of Public Administration training programs and technical assistance.
-
Technology Integration: Leveraging PM-KISAN model of direct transfers and real-time monitoring for transparent service delivery.
-
Cooperative Federalism: Strengthening Inter-State Council mechanisms and NITI Aayog's Development Support Services for better coordination.
While CSS restructuring provides necessary flexibility, success depends on addressing institutional capacity gaps and ensuring genuine center-state partnership. The approach aligns with Article 263 principles of cooperative governance, requiring sustained commitment from both levels of government for effective implementation.
Answer Length
Model answers may exceed the word limit for better clarity and depth. Use them as a guide, but always frame your final answer within the exam’s prescribed limit.
In just 60 sec
Evaluate your handwritten answer
- Get detailed feedback
- Model Answer after evaluation
Model Answers by Subject
Crack UPSC with your
Personal AI Mentor
An AI-powered ecosystem to learn, practice, and evaluate with discipline
