Constitutional mechanisms to resolve the inter-state water disputes have failed to address and solve the problems. Is the failure due to structural or process inadequacy or both? Discuss.

GS 2
Indian Polity
2013
10 Marks

Subject: Indian Polity

The persistent inter-state water disputes in India, despite constitutional mechanisms, highlight the complex interplay between federal structure and resource management. Currently, with 5 active Interstate Water Disputes Tribunals and 2 pending disputes, the resolution framework faces significant challenges in delivering timely and acceptable solutions.

Structural Inadequacies

  • Constitutional Framework Limitations:

    • Article 262 restricts Supreme Court's jurisdiction, limiting judicial oversight and creating a vacuum in dispute resolution.
    • Absence of a permanent institutional mechanism leads to ad-hoc tribunal formation and delayed justice.
  • Federal Design Challenges:

    • Lack of integration between Article 262 (tribunals) and Article 263 (Inter-State Council) creates coordination gaps.
    • Absence of a unified water management agency hampers comprehensive resolution approach.

Process Inadequacies

  • Timeline Issues:

    • Despite the Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956 mandating a 3-year timeframe, disputes like Cauvery (1990-2007) and Godavari (1962-1979) faced significant delays.
    • The Mahanadi Water Disputes Tribunal (2018) deadline of December 2025 shows continuing temporal challenges.
  • Implementation Challenges:

    • Limited enforcement mechanisms for tribunal awards.
    • Lack of standardized data sharing protocols between states.
    • Absence of effective mediation mechanisms before tribunal formation.

Combined Impact

  • Systemic Inefficiencies:

    • The dual impact of structural and process inadequacies creates a compounded effect.
    • Multiple tribunal approach leads to inconsistent jurisprudence and fragmented resolution.
  • Institutional Gaps:

    • Absence of permanent technical expertise affects quality of decisions.
    • Limited scope for stakeholder participation and consensus building.

The failure of constitutional mechanisms in resolving inter-state water disputes stems from both structural and process inadequacies. The way forward lies in establishing a permanent water disputes resolution framework, strengthening the Inter-State Council's role, and implementing strict timelines through the Dam Safety Act, 2021 and River Basin Management Bill.

Answer Length

Model answers may exceed the word limit for better clarity and depth. Use them as a guide, but always frame your final answer within the exam’s prescribed limit.

In just 60 sec

Evaluate your handwritten answer

  • Get detailed feedback
  • Model Answer after evaluation
Evaluate Now

Crack UPSC with your
Personal AI Mentor

An AI-powered ecosystem to learn, practice, and evaluate with discipline

Start Now
SuperKalam is your personal mentor for UPSC preparation, guiding you at every step of the exam journey.
Follow us

ⓒ Snapstack Technologies Private Limited