LiveUPSC Prelims 2026 Answer Key is LIVEView Now

“Right of movement and residence throughout the territory of India are freely available to the Indian citizens, but these rights are not absolute. “ Comment.

GS 2
Indian Polity
2022
10 Marks

The right to freedom of movement and residence is enshrined in Article 19(1)(d) and 19(1)(e) of the Indian Constitution, ensuring that every citizen can move freely throughout India and reside in any part of the territory. However, like other Fundamental Rights, these freedoms are not absolute and are subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(5).

Why these rights are important

  1. National Integration – Strengthens the idea of “One Nation, One People”.

  2. Economic Mobility – Facilitates free labour movement and investments across regions.

  3. Social & Cultural Exchange – Migration enriches cultural pluralism (e.g., IT professionals in Bengaluru from across India).

  4. Empowerment – Enables citizens from backward regions to access opportunities in developed states.

  5. Constitutional Morality – Promotes equality and liberty under the vision of the Preamble.

Restrictions under Article 19(5)

The Constitution permits the State to impose reasonable restrictions in the interest of the general public or for the protection of Scheduled Tribes.

  1. Restrictions for Public Interest

    • Health & Safety: During epidemics like COVID-19, restrictions were imposed on movement and residence.
    • Security & Order: In insurgency-hit areas like Jammu & Kashmir or North-East, movement may be restricted.
  2. Protection of Tribal Interests

    • To preserve indigenous culture and resources, entry and settlement of outsiders is restricted in certain Scheduled Areas under the Fifth and Sixth Schedules.
    • Example: Inner Line Permit (ILP) system in states like Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Mizoram, Manipur.
  3. Special Laws

    • Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act – AFSPA empowers authorities to restrict free movement in disturbed areas.
    • Forest Rights Act 2006 restricts land use to protect ecology and indigenous rights.
  4. Judicial Interpretation

    • In State of Uttar Pradesh v. Kaushaliya (1964), SC held restrictions are valid if they serve public interest.
    • In Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978), the Court broadened the scope of personal liberty but upheld that restrictions must be reasonable, just and fair.

The right to movement and residence is a pillar of individual liberty and national integration, but it cannot override the needs of public order, security, health, and protection of vulnerable communities. Thus, the balance struck by the Constitution between individual liberty and collective interest ensures harmony in a diverse nation like India.

Answer Length

Model answers may exceed the word limit for better clarity and depth. Use them as a guide, but always frame your final answer within the exam’s prescribed limit.

In just 60 sec

Evaluate your handwritten answer

  • Get detailed feedback
  • Model Answer after evaluation
Evaluate Now

Model Answers by Papers

Year-Wise Model Answer

Crack UPSC with your
Personal AI Mentor

An AI-powered ecosystem to learn, practice, and evaluate with discipline

SuperKalam
SuperKalam is your personal mentor for UPSC preparation, guiding you at every step of the exam journey.

Download the App

Get it on Google PlayDownload on the App Store
Follow us

ⓒ Snapstack Technologies Private Limited