Score:
9.5/15
Analyze what earned this score 🔥
Topper’s Copy
GS2
Indian Polity
15 marks
The Supreme Court in State of Uttar Pradesh vs Ajmal Beg (2025) reframed dowry-related violence as a constitutional violation rather than merely a social evil. Discuss the key observations and guidelines issued by the Court. Examine why dowry deaths persist in India despite a strong legal framework.
Student’s Answer
Evaluation by SuperKalam
Demand of the Question
- Key observations of the Supreme Court in the Ajmal Beg case
- Guidelines issued by the Court
- Reasons for persistence of dowry deaths despite strong legal framework
- Constitutional reframing aspect (dowry violence as constitutional violation vs social evil)
What you wrote:
In State of Uttar Pradesh vs Ajmal Beg (2025), the Supreme Court marked a doctrinal shift by framing dowry-related violence and deaths as violations of fundamental rights, not merely social or criminal wrongs. The judgment strengthens constitutional accountability in addressing gender based violence.
In State of Uttar Pradesh vs Ajmal Beg (2025), the Supreme Court marked a doctrinal shift by framing dowry-related violence and deaths as violations of fundamental rights, not merely social or criminal wrongs. The judgment strengthens constitutional accountability in addressing gender based violence.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could briefly mention the significance of this being a 2025 judgment (e.g., "This recent landmark judgment addresses persistent gaps in dowry death prevention despite decades of legislation").
What you wrote:
[DRAWING: A flowchart titled "Dowry Violence as Constitutional Issue". A box labelled "Dowry Violence" has two arrows pointing from it. The top arrow points to "Article 21 (Life & dignity)", which in turn points to "Constitutional violation". A downward arrow from "Constitutional violation" points to "State Duty: • Prevent • Investigate • Punish". The bottom arrow from "Dowry Violence" points to "Article 14-15 (Equality & Non Discrimination)".]
Key Observation of the Supreme Court
1) Article 14&15: Dowry practices reflect systemic gender discrimination, violating equality and non-discrimination.
2) Article 21 Violation: Dowry violence violates a woman's right to life, dignity and bodily integrity.
3) Structural Nature of the Crime: Dowry deaths are linked to patriarchy & social power imbalance, not isolated incidents.
4) State's Positive Obligation: The state has a constitutional duty to prevent, investigate, & punish dowry crimes.
Key Guidelines issued
1) Victim Centric Policing: Mandatory training of police officers in handling dowry complaints.
2) Strict Enforcement of Existing Laws: IPC 498A, 304B, Dowry Prohibition Act to be applied with sensitivity & urgency.
3) Time - bound Investigation & Trial: Fast-track handling of dowry death cases.
4) Data & Monitoring: Improved collection of data on dowry-related crimes for policy response.
[DRAWING: A flowchart titled "Dowry Violence as Constitutional Issue". A box labelled "Dowry Violence" has two arrows pointing from it. The top arrow points to "Article 21 (Life & dignity)", which in turn points to "Constitutional violation". A downward arrow from "Constitutional violation" points to "State Duty: • Prevent • Investigate • Punish". The bottom arrow from "Dowry Violence" points to "Article 14-15 (Equality & Non Discrimination)".]
Key Observation of the Supreme Court
1) Article 14&15: Dowry practices reflect systemic gender discrimination, violating equality and non-discrimination.
2) Article 21 Violation: Dowry violence violates a woman's right to life, dignity and bodily integrity.
3) Structural Nature of the Crime: Dowry deaths are linked to patriarchy & social power imbalance, not isolated incidents.
4) State's Positive Obligation: The state has a constitutional duty to prevent, investigate, & punish dowry crimes.
Key Guidelines issued
1) Victim Centric Policing: Mandatory training of police officers in handling dowry complaints.
2) Strict Enforcement of Existing Laws: IPC 498A, 304B, Dowry Prohibition Act to be applied with sensitivity & urgency.
3) Time - bound Investigation & Trial: Fast-track handling of dowry death cases.
4) Data & Monitoring: Improved collection of data on dowry-related crimes for policy response.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could elaborate on constitutional reframing significance (e.g., "Unlike previous criminal law approach, constitutional framing makes dowry violence a state accountability issue, similar to how custodial violence was reframed in D.K. Basu guidelines")
- Could add specific implementation details (e.g., "Guidelines mandate establishment of dedicated dowry death investigation units and mandatory forensic examination within 24 hours")
What you wrote:
Reasons for Dowry Deaths Persist Despite Strong Laws
1) Misuse Narrative Diluting Enforcement: Overemphasis on misuse of 498A discourages genuine complaints.
2) Economic & Status competition linked to marriage
3) Deep-rooted patriarchal norms legitimizing dowry
4) Poor implementation & delays in justice delivery
Reasons for Dowry Deaths Persist Despite Strong Laws
1) Misuse Narrative Diluting Enforcement: Overemphasis on misuse of 498A discourages genuine complaints.
2) Economic & Status competition linked to marriage
3) Deep-rooted patriarchal norms legitimizing dowry
4) Poor implementation & delays in justice delivery
Suggestions to improve:
- Could discuss conviction rate challenges (e.g., "Low conviction rates of around 34% in dowry death cases due to inadequate evidence collection and witness intimidation")
- Could examine judicial attitudes (e.g., "Courts often focus on 'family reconciliation' rather than justice, as seen in recent bail orders in dowry harassment cases")
- Could mention enforcement gaps (e.g., "Dowry Prohibition Officers exist in only 25% of districts, weakening preventive measures")
What you wrote:
The judgment constitutionalises dowry violence, strengthening state accountability. However, meaningful change requires social reform, institutional sensitivity, and effective enforcement, beyond legal provisions alone.
The judgment constitutionalises dowry violence, strengthening state accountability. However, meaningful change requires social reform, institutional sensitivity, and effective enforcement, beyond legal provisions alone.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could strengthen by referencing broader constitutional values (e.g., "This constitutional approach aligns with transformative constitutionalism, ensuring gender equality moves from aspiration to enforceable right, similar to privacy rights evolution in Puttaswamy judgment").
Your answer demonstrates strong understanding of constitutional principles and provides a clear visual representation. The structure effectively addresses most demands, though deeper analysis of implementation challenges and judicial attitudes would strengthen the response further.
Demand of the Question
- Key observations of the Supreme Court in the Ajmal Beg case
- Guidelines issued by the Court
- Reasons for persistence of dowry deaths despite strong legal framework
- Constitutional reframing aspect (dowry violence as constitutional violation vs social evil)
What you wrote:
In State of Uttar Pradesh vs Ajmal Beg (2025), the Supreme Court marked a doctrinal shift by framing dowry-related violence and deaths as violations of fundamental rights, not merely social or criminal wrongs. The judgment strengthens constitutional accountability in addressing gender based violence.
In State of Uttar Pradesh vs Ajmal Beg (2025), the Supreme Court marked a doctrinal shift by framing dowry-related violence and deaths as violations of fundamental rights, not merely social or criminal wrongs. The judgment strengthens constitutional accountability in addressing gender based violence.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could briefly mention the significance of this being a 2025 judgment (e.g., "This recent landmark judgment addresses persistent gaps in dowry death prevention despite decades of legislation").
More Challenges
View All- View Challenge
GS3
Economy
12 Jan, 2026
“Public service broadcasters are increasingly being repositioned as enablers of the creator and orange economy.”
In this context, examine the significance of Prasar Bharati’s ‘Creator’s Corner’ initiative in promoting the creator economy in India. Discuss its potential implications for public broadcasting reforms, digital inclusion, and cultural economy. - View Challenge
GS3
Science & Technology
Yesterday
“Despite the availability of cost-effective preventive interventions, India continues to report a high burden of neural tube defects such as Spina Bifida.”
In this context, examine the role of pre-conceptional folic acid supplementation and food fortification in preventing Spina Bifida in India. Discuss the challenges in implementation and suggest policy measures to address them. - View Challenge
GS3
Environment & Ecology
10 Jan, 2026
“The debate over conservation of the Western Ghats reflects the tension between ecological sustainability and developmental priorities.”
In this context, critically examine the recommendations of the Western Ghats Expert Ecology Panel (WGEEP) and the Kasturirangan Committee, highlighting their implications for environmental governance in India.
