Score:
6.5/10
Analyze what earned this score 🔥
GS2
Indian Polity
10 marks
Custodial deaths reflect deeper structural issues in India’s policing system.
Discuss the causes of custodial violence and suggest measures to ensure accountability and protection of human rights.
Student’s Answer
Evaluation by SuperKalam
Analyze what earned this score 🔥
Parliamentary data (March 2026) shows 170 custodial deaths in the 2025-26 financial year. Recent NHRC data also highlights persistent custodial deaths underscoring a critical failure in upholding Article 21.
Parliamentary data (March 2026) shows 170 custodial deaths in the 2025-26 financial year. Recent NHRC data also highlights persistent custodial deaths underscoring a critical failure in upholding Article 21.
Causes of Custodial Violence
1. Colonial mindset: 1861 Act prioritises "Control" over "rights".
2. Legislative gaps: failure to ratify UNCAT -> no specific anti-torture law.
3. Systemic Stress: Understaffing + high workload = reliance on "third degree".
4. Impunity: Near zero conviction rate for police - lack of independent oversight.
5. Political Pressure: Demand for "quick results" leads to bypassing due process.
Causes of Custodial Violence
1. Colonial mindset: 1861 Act prioritises "Control" over "rights".
2. Legislative gaps: failure to ratify UNCAT -> no specific anti-torture law.
3. Systemic Stress: Understaffing + high workload = reliance on "third degree".
4. Impunity: Near zero conviction rate for police - lack of independent oversight.
5. Political Pressure: Demand for "quick results" leads to bypassing due process.
Solutions
6. Legal: Ratify UNCAT & enact a dedicated anti torture law.
9. Structural: Separate investigation from law & order eg. Prakash singh case (2006).
10. Technological: Strict enforcement of Paramvir singh saini. (CCTV with audio/night vision).
11. Procedural: Mandatory adherence to D.K. Basu Guidelines, arrest memos (medical checks).
12. Oversight: Empower NHRC/SHRC for surprise, independent inspection.
13. Training: Shift focus to scientific forensics & human rights sensitization.
Solutions
6. Legal: Ratify UNCAT & enact a dedicated anti torture law.
9. Structural: Separate investigation from law & order eg. Prakash singh case (2006).
10. Technological: Strict enforcement of Paramvir singh saini. (CCTV with audio/night vision).
11. Procedural: Mandatory adherence to D.K. Basu Guidelines, arrest memos (medical checks).
12. Oversight: Empower NHRC/SHRC for surprise, independent inspection.
13. Training: Shift focus to scientific forensics & human rights sensitization.
India must transition to rights based policing to achieve the SDG16 goal of providing access to justice for all citizens.
India must transition to rights based policing to achieve the SDG16 goal of providing access to justice for all citizens.
Strong factual foundation and comprehensive coverage of causes and solutions. However, missed connecting individual points to the broader "structural issues" theme and needs stronger constitutional/legal backing for arguments. Good practical understanding of policing challenges.
Parliamentary data (March 2026) shows 170 custodial deaths in the 2025-26 financial year. Recent NHRC data also highlights persistent custodial deaths underscoring a critical failure in upholding Article 21.
Parliamentary data (March 2026) shows 170 custodial deaths in the 2025-26 financial year. Recent NHRC data also highlights persistent custodial deaths underscoring a critical failure in upholding Article 21.
GS2
Indian Polity
13 Aug, 2026
The FCRA Amendment Bill, 2026 seeks to strengthen state oversight over foreign-funded organisations while raising concerns about civil society autonomy. Critically examine.
GS3
Economy
Yesterday
The next phase of India's MSME growth lies not merely in creating more enterprises, but in clustering them. Examine how a cluster-based approach can enhance the productivity and global competitiveness of Indian MSMEs.
GS2
Social Justice
11 Aug, 2026
The demand for Scheduled Caste status for Dalit Christians raises complex questions of caste discrimination, religious freedom and affirmative action. Critically examine the constitutional and socio-legal dimensions of this debate.