Score:
5/10
Analyze what earned this score 🔥
Topper’s Copy
GS3
Economy
10 marks
“Geoeconomic confrontation has emerged as the most significant global risk in the World Economic Forum’s Global Risk Report 2026.”
In this context, define geoeconomic confrontation and examine its potential implications for global governance and developing economies like India.
Student’s Answer
Evaluation by SuperKalam
Demand of the Question
- Define geoeconomic confrontation
- Examine implications for global governance
- Examine implications for developing economies like India
- Connect analysis to WEF Global Risk Report 2026 context
What you wrote:
Geoeconomic confrontation refers to the strategic use of economic instruments like trade sanctions, restrictions, investment controls, subsidies and currency measures by global or regional powers, aimed at promoting self-reliance and restrain rivals. Over the next two years, geoeconomic confrontation will be at severe risk as per the Global Risk Report (2026) by World Economic Forum (WEF).
Geoeconomic confrontation refers to the strategic use of economic instruments like trade sanctions, restrictions, investment controls, subsidies and currency measures by global or regional powers, aimed at promoting self-reliance and restrain rivals. Over the next two years, geoeconomic confrontation will be at severe risk as per the Global Risk Report (2026) by World Economic Forum (WEF).
Suggestions to improve:
- Could refine the language to state "geoeconomic confrontation has been identified as the most severe risk over the next two years"
- Can add a brief context about why this has become prominent (e.g., rising US-China tensions, post-COVID supply chain vulnerabilities)
What you wrote:
Implications for global governance
(1) Erosion of multilateralism - Shift from established rules and institutions like WTO to unilateral actions creates a 'vicious cycle' of retaliation.
⇒ Trump's tariff imposition, ban on the export of critical minerals by China, etc.
(2) Global instability & conflict risk - 'Weaponization' of trade and finance threatens longstanding international relations.
(3) Decline in Trust - Decreased transparency and a reduced respect for the rule of law in international trade, undermining trust.
(4) Fragmentation of global economy - leads to the formation of rival economic blocs and supply chains, increasing costs.
(5) Geopolitical tensions - Economic conflict can spill over into political and security tensions.
Implications for global governance
(1) Erosion of multilateralism - Shift from established rules and institutions like WTO to unilateral actions creates a 'vicious cycle' of retaliation.
⇒ Trump's tariff imposition, ban on the export of critical minerals by China, etc.
(2) Global instability & conflict risk - 'Weaponization' of trade and finance threatens longstanding international relations.
(3) Decline in Trust - Decreased transparency and a reduced respect for the rule of law in international trade, undermining trust.
(4) Fragmentation of global economy - leads to the formation of rival economic blocs and supply chains, increasing costs.
(5) Geopolitical tensions - Economic conflict can spill over into political and security tensions.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could elaborate on Trump's tariffs (e.g., 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum imports affecting global trade worth $48 billion annually)
- Can discuss how WTO's dispute resolution mechanism has been paralyzed due to US blocking of Appellate Body appointments since 2019
- Could mention fragmentation of financial systems (e.g., exclusion of Russian banks from SWIFT system affecting global payment networks)
What you wrote:
Implications for Developing countries (India):
(1) Supply chain disruptions - Nations like India face disruptions in critical imports (Semiconductor energy) and challenges in goods exports.
(2) Investment challenges - May struggle to attract foreign investments as capital flows become more politically driven and restricted.
(3) Exacerbating inequalities - Trade volatility can negatively impact employment and economic stability. Hence, exacerbate inequality of income & wealth.
(4) Difficulties in accessing advance technologies, capital and export markets, potentially hinder growth.
Implications for Developing countries (India):
(1) Supply chain disruptions - Nations like India face disruptions in critical imports (Semiconductor energy) and challenges in goods exports.
(2) Investment challenges - May struggle to attract foreign investments as capital flows become more politically driven and restricted.
(3) Exacerbating inequalities - Trade volatility can negatively impact employment and economic stability. Hence, exacerbate inequality of income & wealth.
(4) Difficulties in accessing advance technologies, capital and export markets, potentially hinder growth.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could include specific examples like India's semiconductor import dependency (85% from China and Taiwan) creating vulnerabilities during chip shortages
- Can mention friend-shoring opportunities (e.g., India benefiting from Apple's supply chain diversification with $7 billion investment commitments)
- Could discuss India's experience with economic coercion (e.g., China's informal boycotts of Indian goods post-Galwan clash affecting $15 billion bilateral trade)
What you wrote:
Way forward:
(1) Diversification - As per the Report, India should navigate 'geopolitical recession' and promote supply chain diversification in its trade.
(2) Balanced approach - Should adopt a balanced approach that combines strategic independence with economic participation.
(3) Domestic strength - Opportunity for India to promote self-reliance and develop indigenous technology.
(4) Broadening trade partnerships - Promoting multilateralism in fostering knowledge and technology.
Way forward:
(1) Diversification - As per the Report, India should navigate 'geopolitical recession' and promote supply chain diversification in its trade.
(2) Balanced approach - Should adopt a balanced approach that combines strategic independence with economic participation.
(3) Domestic strength - Opportunity for India to promote self-reliance and develop indigenous technology.
(4) Broadening trade partnerships - Promoting multilateralism in fostering knowledge and technology.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could suggest strengthening South-South cooperation (e.g., India's leadership in International Solar Alliance with 100+ member countries)
- Can mention regional economic integration (e.g., India's potential re-engagement with Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership discussions)
- Could discuss building resilient payment systems (e.g., India's UPI internationalization and rupee trade mechanisms)
What you wrote:
Navigating this era, requires a strategy that balances strategic autonomy with global engagement. Developing countries like India should promote "make in India" initiatives and enhancing domestic technological capabilities.
Navigating this era, requires a strategy that balances strategic autonomy with global engagement. Developing countries like India should promote "make in India" initiatives and enhancing domestic technological capabilities.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could conclude with India's role in shaping alternative global economic architecture (e.g., India's G20 presidency promoting Global South voice in international economic governance)
- Can emphasize India's potential as a bridge between competing blocs while maintaining its strategic autonomy principles
The answer demonstrates good structural organization and covers all major demands comprehensively. However, it needs more specific examples and deeper analysis of India's unique position in navigating geoeconomic confrontations while leveraging emerging opportunities.
Demand of the Question
- Define geoeconomic confrontation
- Examine implications for global governance
- Examine implications for developing economies like India
- Connect analysis to WEF Global Risk Report 2026 context
What you wrote:
Geoeconomic confrontation refers to the strategic use of economic instruments like trade sanctions, restrictions, investment controls, subsidies and currency measures by global or regional powers, aimed at promoting self-reliance and restrain rivals. Over the next two years, geoeconomic confrontation will be at severe risk as per the Global Risk Report (2026) by World Economic Forum (WEF).
Geoeconomic confrontation refers to the strategic use of economic instruments like trade sanctions, restrictions, investment controls, subsidies and currency measures by global or regional powers, aimed at promoting self-reliance and restrain rivals. Over the next two years, geoeconomic confrontation will be at severe risk as per the Global Risk Report (2026) by World Economic Forum (WEF).
Suggestions to improve:
- Could refine the language to state "geoeconomic confrontation has been identified as the most severe risk over the next two years"
- Can add a brief context about why this has become prominent (e.g., rising US-China tensions, post-COVID supply chain vulnerabilities)
More Challenges
View All- View Challenge
GS3
Science & Technology
19 Jan, 2026
“PSLV is often described as ISRO’s workhorse launch vehicle.”
Explain the design features and stage-wise functioning of PSLV that justify this description. - View Challenge
GS2
Indian Polity
Yesterday
What is the Panchayat (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA)? Examine its significance in empowering tribal self-governance in Fifth Schedule areas. Discuss the major challenges in its effective implementation.
- View Challenge
GS2
Indian Polity
17 Jan, 2026
Critically examine the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 in light of the Supreme Court’s split verdict in Centre for Public Interest Litigation v. Union of India. Discuss its implications for the fight against corruption and the principles of equality and accountability in public administration.
