Score:
6.5/10
Analyze what earned this score 🔥
Topper’s Copy
GS2
Governance
10 marks
“The Assam Prohibition of Polygamy Bill, 2025 reflects the tension between uniform civil laws and protection of tribal customs.”
Discuss in the context of constitutional provisions and gender justice in India.
Student’s Answer
Evaluation by SuperKalam
Demand of the Question
- Discuss the tension between uniform civil laws and protection of tribal customs.
- Discuss the tension in the context of constitutional provisions.
- Discuss the tension in the context of gender justice in India.
- Analyze the Assam Prohibition of Polygamy Bill, 2025 as a case study.
What you wrote:
The Assam Prohibition of Polygamy Bill, 2025 seeks to ban polygamy across the state to ensure equality and gender justice, while exempting scheduled Tribes governed by customary laws.
This creates a constitutional and social tension between the idea of a uniform civil law and protection of tribal traditions, reflecting India's plural character.
The Assam Prohibition of Polygamy Bill, 2025 seeks to ban polygamy across the state to ensure equality and gender justice, while exempting scheduled Tribes governed by customary laws.
This creates a constitutional and social tension between the idea of a uniform civil law and protection of tribal traditions, reflecting India's plural character.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could strengthen by briefly mentioning the constitutional framework (e.g., "This tension reflects the challenge between Article 44's uniform civil code directive and Article 371's tribal autonomy provisions").
What you wrote:
Tension between uniform civil laws and Tribal Customs: A constitutional perspective :-
1. [Article 14] ensures equality before law, supporting the state's attempt to prohibit discriminatory practices.
2. Full uniformity conflicts with [Article 371] and the [sixth schedule], which preserve tribal autonomy and customary laws.
3. [Article 25] protects freedom of religion, but this right is subject to public order, morality and health. States can regulate secular aspects of marriage to ensure morality and equality.
4. [Article 44] - DPSP envisions uniform civil code, but its gradual implementation must respect India's cultural and regional diversity.
5. The Bill embodies a constitutional balancing Act: ensuring reform without erasing local identity.
Tension between uniform civil laws and Tribal Customs: A constitutional perspective :-
1. [Article 14] ensures equality before law, supporting the state's attempt to prohibit discriminatory practices.
2. Full uniformity conflicts with [Article 371] and the [sixth schedule], which preserve tribal autonomy and customary laws.
3. [Article 25] protects freedom of religion, but this right is subject to public order, morality and health. States can regulate secular aspects of marriage to ensure morality and equality.
4. [Article 44] - DPSP envisions uniform civil code, but its gradual implementation must respect India's cultural and regional diversity.
5. The Bill embodies a constitutional balancing Act: ensuring reform without erasing local identity.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could elaborate on Sixth Schedule provisions (e.g., "Sixth Schedule grants autonomous district councils legislative powers over marriage and divorce customs, creating parallel legal systems")
- Could reference specific tribal communities affected (e.g., "Bodo, Karbi, and Dimasa communities under Sixth Schedule have distinct marriage customs that may conflict with uniform prohibition")
What you wrote:
Tension between uniform civil laws and Tribal customs: A Gender Justice perspective :-
1. Bill advances gender equality (articles 14, 15, 21) by challenging patriarchal norms inherent in polygamy.
2. Excluding tribal women risks delaying gender justice for a significant section of the society, creating asymmetrical empowerment.
3. True justice requires context-sensitive reform, shaped by tribal women's participation rather than external imposition.
4. Intersectional disadvantage - Tribal women face a dual marginalisation: as a woman in a patriarchal structure and as a member of a community with limited safeguard, making uniform gender justice complex.
Tension between uniform civil laws and Tribal customs: A Gender Justice perspective :-
1. Bill advances gender equality (articles 14, 15, 21) by challenging patriarchal norms inherent in polygamy.
2. Excluding tribal women risks delaying gender justice for a significant section of the society, creating asymmetrical empowerment.
3. True justice requires context-sensitive reform, shaped by tribal women's participation rather than external imposition.
4. Intersectional disadvantage - Tribal women face a dual marginalisation: as a woman in a patriarchal structure and as a member of a community with limited safeguard, making uniform gender justice complex.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could discuss judicial evolution on gender rights (e.g., "Supreme Court in Shayara Bano emphasized that personal laws cannot violate constitutional equality, establishing precedent for gender-sensitive reform")
- Could examine successful models of tribal law reform (e.g., "Himachal Pradesh's gradual integration of tribal customs with gender equality through community consultation provides a template")
What you wrote:
[DRAWING: A circle labeled 'way forward' has four arrows pointing outwards to the following points:]
1. Inclusive dialogue with Tribal councils, women's group and local leaders
2. Phased legal harmonisation.
3. Provision for voluntary adoption.
4. Empowerment through awareness
The Assam Bill thus mirrors a larger constitutional journey seen in cases like Shayara Bano v. Union of India (2017) where gender justice prevailed, and the Meghalaya customary law debate(2018), where tribal autonomy resisted external reform. Together, they underline the delicate task of ensuring constitutional pluralism with gender sensitivity.
[DRAWING: A circle labeled 'way forward' has four arrows pointing outwards to the following points:]
1. Inclusive dialogue with Tribal councils, women's group and local leaders
2. Phased legal harmonisation.
3. Provision for voluntary adoption.
4. Empowerment through awareness
The Assam Bill thus mirrors a larger constitutional journey seen in cases like Shayara Bano v. Union of India (2017) where gender justice prevailed, and the Meghalaya customary law debate(2018), where tribal autonomy resisted external reform. Together, they underline the delicate task of ensuring constitutional pluralism with gender sensitivity.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could conclude with forward-looking perspective (e.g., "The Bill represents India's evolving approach to constitutional harmonization, where gender justice and cultural preservation can coexist through participatory reform processes").
Your answer demonstrates strong constitutional knowledge and analytical depth, effectively addressing both constitutional and gender justice dimensions. The systematic structure and relevant case law references show excellent preparation. Minor improvements in elaborating specific provisions and integrating recent developments would enhance the response further.
Demand of the Question
- Discuss the tension between uniform civil laws and protection of tribal customs.
- Discuss the tension in the context of constitutional provisions.
- Discuss the tension in the context of gender justice in India.
- Analyze the Assam Prohibition of Polygamy Bill, 2025 as a case study.
What you wrote:
The Assam Prohibition of Polygamy Bill, 2025 seeks to ban polygamy across the state to ensure equality and gender justice, while exempting scheduled Tribes governed by customary laws.
This creates a constitutional and social tension between the idea of a uniform civil law and protection of tribal traditions, reflecting India's plural character.
The Assam Prohibition of Polygamy Bill, 2025 seeks to ban polygamy across the state to ensure equality and gender justice, while exempting scheduled Tribes governed by customary laws.
This creates a constitutional and social tension between the idea of a uniform civil law and protection of tribal traditions, reflecting India's plural character.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could strengthen by briefly mentioning the constitutional framework (e.g., "This tension reflects the challenge between Article 44's uniform civil code directive and Article 371's tribal autonomy provisions").
More Challenges
View All- View Challenge
GS2
Indian Polity
29 Nov, 2025
Critically examine the Election Commission’s stance on simultaneous elections in India, especially with reference to the basic structure doctrine and election-related institutional mechanisms.
- View Challenge
GS2
Governance
Yesterday
Critically examine the limitations of the POSH Act in addressing sexual harassment in educational institutions, especially in cases involving power imbalance and emotional manipulation. Suggest reforms.
- View Challenge
GS2
Indian Polity
27 Nov, 2025
With the rise of deepfake technologies and AI-generated content, discuss the challenges they pose to personality rights in India. Evaluate the adequacy of existing legal frameworks and suggest measures to ensure stronger protection.
