Score:
6.5/10
Analyze what earned this score 🔥
Topper’s Copy
GS3
Economy
10 marks
The Sixteenth Finance Commission has introduced “Contribution to GDP” as a new criterion for horizontal devolution of taxes.
Explain the rationale behind this inclusion and discuss how the Commission attempted to balance efficiency with equity.
Student’s Answer
Evaluation by SuperKalam
Demand of the Question
- Rationale behind inclusion of "Contribution to GDP" as new criterion
- How the Commission balanced efficiency with equity through this and other measures
What you wrote:
The rationale behind introducing 'Contribution to GDP' as a criterion for horizontal devolution by the Sixteenth Finance Commission lies in addressing the equity-efficiency trade-off in fiscal federalism. States with higher Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) contribute significantly to national income, tax revenues, employment generation and inter-state economic linkages and therefore merit recognition in resource distribution.
The rationale behind introducing 'Contribution to GDP' as a criterion for horizontal devolution by the Sixteenth Finance Commission lies in addressing the equity-efficiency trade-off in fiscal federalism. States with higher Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) contribute significantly to national income, tax revenues, employment generation and inter-state economic linkages and therefore merit recognition in resource distribution.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could strengthen with specific context (e.g., "The 16th Finance Commission, constituted in 2023 under NK Singh's chairmanship, introduced this criterion responding to demands from high-contributing states like Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu for greater recognition of their economic contributions")
What you wrote:
The criterion promotes efficiency by rewarding growth-oriented states and incentivising better economic governance, productivity enhancement and investment-friendly policies. It discourages fiscal complacency and aligns transfers with economic performance.
The criterion promotes efficiency by rewarding growth-oriented states and incentivising better economic governance, productivity enhancement and investment-friendly policies. It discourages fiscal complacency and aligns transfers with economic performance.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could explain historical context (e.g., "Previous Finance Commissions relied heavily on population and area, leading to complaints from states like Gujarat and Karnataka that their economic contributions weren't adequately recognized")
- Could add specific policy incentives (e.g., "States investing in infrastructure, ease of doing business reforms, and industrial promotion would see higher GSDP growth, directly translating to increased transfers")
What you wrote:
At the same time, to prevent skewed transfers in favour of richer states the Commission introduced square-root moderation of GSDP, which reduces the dominance of large economies while retaining the incentive effect. Further, redistributive parameters such as income distance, population and area were retained to protect equity and ensure adequate fiscal support for poorer and less developed states.
At the same time, to prevent skewed transfers in favour of richer states the Commission introduced square-root moderation of GSDP, which reduces the dominance of large economies while retaining the incentive effect. Further, redistributive parameters such as income distance, population and area were retained to protect equity and ensure adequate fiscal support for poorer and less developed states.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could specify the balancing mechanism (e.g., "The Commission assigned 15% weight to GSDP contribution while maintaining 45% for population and 15% for income distance, ensuring redistributive goals aren't compromised")
- Could mention additional equity measures (e.g., "Special provisions for northeastern states and disaster-prone regions were retained to address unique developmental challenges")
What you wrote:
Thus, the Commission balanced efficiency with equity while strengthening cooperative federalism. This approach ensures that fiscal transfers remain growth-sensitive without undermining the redistributive role of the Finance Commission.
Thus, the Commission balanced efficiency with equity while strengthening cooperative federalism. This approach ensures that fiscal transfers remain growth-sensitive without undermining the redistributive role of the Finance Commission.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could strengthen with forward-looking perspective (e.g., "This balanced framework could serve as a model for future Finance Commissions, promoting competitive federalism while ensuring no state is left behind in India's growth trajectory")
Your answer demonstrates solid conceptual understanding of the efficiency-equity balance and the square-root moderation mechanism. However, it could benefit from more specific contextual details about why this criterion was introduced and concrete examples of the balancing mechanisms used.
Demand of the Question
- Rationale behind inclusion of "Contribution to GDP" as new criterion
- How the Commission balanced efficiency with equity through this and other measures
What you wrote:
The rationale behind introducing 'Contribution to GDP' as a criterion for horizontal devolution by the Sixteenth Finance Commission lies in addressing the equity-efficiency trade-off in fiscal federalism. States with higher Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) contribute significantly to national income, tax revenues, employment generation and inter-state economic linkages and therefore merit recognition in resource distribution.
The rationale behind introducing 'Contribution to GDP' as a criterion for horizontal devolution by the Sixteenth Finance Commission lies in addressing the equity-efficiency trade-off in fiscal federalism. States with higher Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) contribute significantly to national income, tax revenues, employment generation and inter-state economic linkages and therefore merit recognition in resource distribution.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could strengthen with specific context (e.g., "The 16th Finance Commission, constituted in 2023 under NK Singh's chairmanship, introduced this criterion responding to demands from high-contributing states like Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu for greater recognition of their economic contributions")
More Challenges
View All- View Challenge
GS3
Science & Technology
1 Mar, 2026
Carbon Capture and Utilisation (CCU) is emerging as a key strategy for decarbonising hard-to-abate sectors in India. Explain the concept of CCU and examine its potential, challenges, and policy measures required for its large-scale adoption in India.
- View Challenge
GS3
Indian Polity
Yesterday
“Recent advances in HIV treatment have focused on targeting the viral capsid using long-acting drugs such as lenacapavir.”
Explain the significance of capsid-targeting therapies in controlling HIV infection. Also discuss the challenges of drug resistance and the role of combination therapy. - View Challenge
GS2
Indian Polity
27 Feb, 2026
The balance between transparency and privacy is a recurring constitutional challenge in India.
In the light of recent amendments to the RTI framework through the Digital Personal Data Protection law, examine whether the exemption of personal information undermines accountability of public authorities.
