The Food Security Bill is expected to eliminate hunger and malnutrition in India. Critically discuss various apprehensions in its effective implementation along with the concerns it has generated in the WTO.
The Food Security Bill is expected to eliminate hunger and malnutrition in India. Critically discuss various apprehensions in its effective implementation along with the concerns it has generated in the WTO.
The National Food Security Act (NFSA), 2013, represents India's commitment to ensuring food security through a rights-based approach. However, its implementation faces significant challenges while generating concerns at international trade forums.
Implementation Apprehensions
Identification and Targeting Issues
- Exclusion Errors: Approximately 100 million eligible beneficiaries remain excluded due to outdated Census data and faulty BPL surveys
- Inclusion Errors: Non-deserving households receive benefits, reducing resources for actual beneficiaries
- Aadhaar Linkage Problems: Technical glitches in Aadhaar-PDS integration leading to denial of food grains to legitimate beneficiaries
- Inter-state Portability: Migrant workers face difficulties accessing benefits across state boundaries
- Rural-Urban Disparities: Urban slum dwellers often lack proper documentation for scheme enrollment
Operational and Administrative Challenges
- Leakage and Diversion: 28% of allocated grains don't reach intended beneficiaries, causing annual losses of ₹69,108 crores
- Storage Infrastructure: Inadequate Food Corporation of India (FCI) storage capacity leading to 20% post-harvest losses
- Quality Issues: Distribution of substandard grains affecting nutritional outcomes
- Dealer Malpractices: Fair Price Shop owners engaging in black marketing and quantity manipulation
- Monitoring Weakness: Poor grievance redressal mechanisms and lack of social audits
Financial Sustainability Concerns
- Escalating Costs: Food subsidy burden of ₹2,05,250 crore (2024-25) straining fiscal resources
- Procurement Expenses: Rising Minimum Support Price (MSP) increasing government's financial liability
- State Government Burden: Additional costs for state-specific schemes and administrative expenses
- Economic Inefficiency: High per-unit delivery costs compared to direct cash transfers
- Long-term Viability: Questions about program sustainability amid fiscal consolidation goals
WTO Concerns and Trade Implications
| Aspect | WTO Concerns | India's Position |
|---|---|---|
| Subsidy Limits | Violation of 10% de minimis support | Invokes "Peace Clause" protection |
| Market Distortion | Artificial price support affecting global trade | Domestic food security priority |
| Procurement Policy | MSP-based purchases exceed WTO limits | Historical methodology disputes |
International Trade Disputes
- Formal Complaints: US, Australia, Canada challenging India's agricultural subsidies at WTO
- Market Access Impact: India's rice exports (87% subsidy) and wheat exports (75% subsidy) affecting global prices
- Doha Round Negotiations: India advocating for permanent solution on public stockholding for food security
- G-33 Coalition: Leading developing countries' demand for special safeguard mechanisms
- Bilateral Pressure: Trade partners linking FTA negotiations to agricultural subsidy reforms
Mitigation Strategies and Way Forward
Technology Integration
- Digital Infrastructure: Expanding One Nation One Ration Card to ensure portability
- Blockchain Technology: Implementing supply chain transparency through distributed ledgers
- Direct Benefit Transfer: Gradual shift to cash transfers for better targeting and reduced leakage
International Diplomacy
- WTO Negotiations: Securing permanent solution for public stockholding programs
- South-South Cooperation: Building alliances with BRICS and G-77 nations on food security issues
The NFSA's success depends on addressing implementation gaps while navigating international trade obligations. Strengthening PDS digitalization, improving beneficiary identification, and finding WTO-compliant solutions remain critical for achieving the dual objectives of food security and trade harmony.
Answer Length
Model answers may exceed the word limit for better clarity and depth. Use them as a guide, but always frame your final answer within the exam’s prescribed limit.
In just 60 sec
Evaluate your handwritten answer
- Get detailed feedback
- Model Answer after evaluation
Model Answers by Subject
Crack UPSC with your
Personal AI Mentor
An AI-powered ecosystem to learn, practice, and evaluate with discipline

