Score:
6/10
Analyze what earned this score 🔥
Topper’s Copy
GS2
Indian Polity
10 marks
Mass political shifts are often justified as ‘mergers’ rather than ‘defections’. Critically examine this distinction under the Tenth Schedule.
Student’s Answer
Evaluation by SuperKalam
Demand of the Question
- Understanding the legal distinction between mergers and defections under Tenth Schedule
- Critical examination of how mass political shifts are justified as mergers
- Assessment of whether this distinction serves its intended purpose or enables circumvention
What you wrote:
The 52nd Constitutional Amendment Act 1985 introduced the Tenth schedule to curb defections. However, the distinction between defection (Para 2) and merger (Para 4) has blurred in Practice.
The 52nd Constitutional Amendment Act 1985 introduced the Tenth schedule to curb defections. However, the distinction between defection (Para 2) and merger (Para 4) has blurred in Practice.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could enhance with the constitutional objective (e.g., "introduced to ensure political stability and maintain electoral mandate integrity")
What you wrote:
Legal distinction
1. Para 2 (defection): Individual or small group switching parties → disqualification
2. Para 4 (merger): ≥2/3 members agree to merge → exemption from disqualification.
Legal distinction
1. Para 2 (defection): Individual or small group switching parties → disqualification
2. Para 4 (merger): ≥2/3 members agree to merge → exemption from disqualification.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could add critical perspective on the 2/3 threshold (e.g., "the arbitrary 2/3 threshold creates perverse incentives for orchestrated mass defections rather than preventing individual opportunism")
- Could mention Article 191 which empowers Speaker's role in disqualification proceedings
What you wrote:
Critical Examination
3. Circumvention of law: The 2/3 threshold legitimizes what is essentially collective defection.
4. Mandate distortion: Voters elect party representative, not shifting coalitions → violate representative democracy.
5. Legislative Vs Organisational split: Law recognizes only legislative party, enabling takeover without party consent.
6. Speaker's discretion: As seen in Kihoto Hollohan Vs Zachillhu (1992), delays enable engineered mergers.
7. Rise of political opportunities: Encourages "bulk defections" instead of curbing them.
Critical Examination
3. Circumvention of law: The 2/3 threshold legitimizes what is essentially collective defection.
4. Mandate distortion: Voters elect party representative, not shifting coalitions → violate representative democracy.
5. Legislative Vs Organisational split: Law recognizes only legislative party, enabling takeover without party consent.
6. Speaker's discretion: As seen in Kihoto Hollohan Vs Zachillhu (1992), delays enable engineered mergers.
7. Rise of political opportunities: Encourages "bulk defections" instead of curbing them.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could strengthen with recent examples (e.g., "Goa Assembly defections in 2022 where 8 Congress MLAs joined BJP, citing merger provisions")
- Could add constitutional morality aspect (e.g., "violates the spirit of Article 102/191 which aims to maintain legislative integrity")
What you wrote:
Way forward
8. Remove merger exception as per Law Commission 170th report.
9. Shift decision making to Election Commission of India as per Dinesh Goswami committee recommendation.
10. Time bound adjudication.
Way forward
8. Remove merger exception as per Law Commission 170th report.
9. Shift decision making to Election Commission of India as per Dinesh Goswami committee recommendation.
10. Time bound adjudication.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could discuss Election Commission's quasi-judicial role in symbol disputes as precedent for decision-making transfer
- Could mention fixed time limits (e.g., "decisions within 90 days as recommended by various parliamentary committees")
What you wrote:
Thus, as noted by Law Commission 170th report, the merger provision has effectively legitimized defections, undermining the Tenth scheme core objective.
Thus, as noted by Law Commission 170th report, the merger provision has effectively legitimized defections, undermining the Tenth scheme core objective.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could conclude with broader democratic implications (e.g., "ensuring that electoral mandates reflect genuine political will rather than post-election opportunism, thereby strengthening India's parliamentary democracy")
Strong constitutional knowledge with relevant case law and committee references. The answer effectively demonstrates the gap between legal provisions and practical outcomes. However, could benefit from more contemporary examples and clearer structural organization of critical points.
Demand of the Question
- Understanding the legal distinction between mergers and defections under Tenth Schedule
- Critical examination of how mass political shifts are justified as mergers
- Assessment of whether this distinction serves its intended purpose or enables circumvention
What you wrote:
The 52nd Constitutional Amendment Act 1985 introduced the Tenth schedule to curb defections. However, the distinction between defection (Para 2) and merger (Para 4) has blurred in Practice.
The 52nd Constitutional Amendment Act 1985 introduced the Tenth schedule to curb defections. However, the distinction between defection (Para 2) and merger (Para 4) has blurred in Practice.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could enhance with the constitutional objective (e.g., "introduced to ensure political stability and maintain electoral mandate integrity")
More Challenges
View All- View Challenge
GS3
Internal Security
16 Jun, 2026
"Recent protests in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) and Gilgit-Baltistan highlight the challenges of governance, political representation, and resource distribution in Pakistan-administered regions of the former princely state of Jammu & Kashmir." Discuss. Also examine the strategic significance of these developments for India.
- View Challenge
GS2
SOCIAL_ISSUES_AND_SCHEMES
Yesterday
"Despite constitutional guarantees and statutory protections, disability welfare in India continues to suffer from fragmented implementation and inadequate social security coverage."
In this context, examine the need for a Uniform Nationwide Disability Pension System in India. Discuss the constitutional basis, socio-economic rationale, key challenges, and suggest measures for effective implementation. - View Challenge
GS1
Art & Culture
14 Jun, 2026
What is a Geographical Indication (GI) tag? Explain how GI-tagged products such as Tezpur Litchi contribute to rural development, branding, and export promotion in India.
SuperKalam is your personal mentor for UPSC preparation, guiding you at every step of the exam journey.
Download the App
STUDY RESOURCES
CONTACT US
ⓒ Snapstack Technologies Private Limited