Topper’s Copy

GS2

Indian Polity

10 marks

“Changing the name of a State in India reflects the cooperative yet asymmetrical nature of Indian federalism.”
Discuss the constitutional procedure for renaming a State and examine the role played by the State Legislature and Parliament in this process.

Student’s Answer

Evaluation by SuperKalam

icon

Score:

5.5/10

0
3
6
10

Demand of the Question

  • Constitutional procedure for renaming a State
  • Role of State Legislature in the process
  • Role of Parliament in the process
  • Connection to cooperative yet asymmetrical federalism

What you wrote:

Recent proposal such as the demand to rename Kerala as "Keralam" (2023-25 resolution) and earlier changes like Orissa → Odisha (2011) highlight how renaming states reflects India's cooperative yet asymmetrical federal structure.

[DRAWING: A flowchart with the title "Renaming Process". The flow is as follows: "State Resolution" points to "President Refers to State Legislature" which points to "Opinion Sent to Parliament". An arrow points downwards from "Opinion Sent to Parliament" to "Parliament Passes Bill (Art. 3)". An arrow points from "Parliament Passes Bill (Art. 3)" to "Presidential Assent", which then points to a box labeled "New Name".]

Recent proposal such as the demand to rename Kerala as "Keralam" (2023-25 resolution) and earlier changes like Orissa → Odisha (2011) highlight how renaming states reflects India's cooperative yet asymmetrical federal structure.

[DRAWING: A flowchart with the title "Renaming Process". The flow is as follows: "State Resolution" points to "President Refers to State Legislature" which points to "Opinion Sent to Parliament". An arrow points downwards from "Opinion Sent to Parliament" to "Parliament Passes Bill (Art. 3)". An arrow points from "Parliament Passes Bill (Art. 3)" to "Presidential Assent", which then points to a box labeled "New Name".]

Suggestions to improve:

  • Could strengthen by briefly defining cooperative federalism (shared decision-making between Centre and States) and asymmetrical federalism (unequal power distribution favoring Centre) upfront for conceptual clarity.

What you wrote:

Constitutional Procedure (Article 3)
1.) Bill introduced only in Parliament.
2.) President refers it to concerned State legislature.
3.) State gives its views (not binding) within specified time.
4.) Parliament passes Bill by Simple majority.
5.) Presidential assent finalizes change.

Federal Nature Reflected
Cooperative Aspect
(i) States opinion is sought before change.
(ii) Reflects democratic consultation.

Asymmetrical Aspect
(i) Parliament is not bound by the State's opinion.
(ii) Final power lies with the Union.

Role of Institutions
'State Legislature': Expresses regional identity and political will.
'Parliament': Ensures national unity and Constitutional uniformity.

Constitutional Procedure (Article 3)
1.) Bill introduced only in Parliament.
2.) President refers it to concerned State legislature.
3.) State gives its views (not binding) within specified time.
4.) Parliament passes Bill by Simple majority.
5.) Presidential assent finalizes change.

Federal Nature Reflected
Cooperative Aspect
(i) States opinion is sought before change.
(ii) Reflects democratic consultation.

Asymmetrical Aspect
(i) Parliament is not bound by the State's opinion.
(ii) Final power lies with the Union.

Role of Institutions
'State Legislature': Expresses regional identity and political will.
'Parliament': Ensures national unity and Constitutional uniformity.

Suggestions to improve:

  • Could elaborate on Article 3's specific provisions (e.g., "Parliament can alter boundaries, names of states under Article 3 without requiring state consent, unlike Article 368 for constitutional amendments")
  • Could mention time frame specifications (e.g., "President typically gives states 3-6 months to respond, as seen in Telangana formation process")
  • Could expand on State Legislature's role (e.g., "State Assembly can pass resolutions expressing popular will, as Kerala did unanimously for 'Keralam', but lacks constitutional veto power")
  • Could detail Parliament's role (e.g., "Both Houses of Parliament must pass the bill by simple majority, unlike special majority needed for constitutional amendments, showing Centre's dominance in territorial matters")
  • Could add examples of divergent outcomes (e.g., "Gorkhaland demand shows how state opposition can delay but not prevent Union decisions")

What you wrote:

Recent resolution by Kerala Assembly (2023-25) to rename the State as "Keralam" revives debate on Article 3 and India's cooperative yet union-dominant federalism.

Recent resolution by Kerala Assembly (2023-25) to rename the State as "Keralam" revives debate on Article 3 and India's cooperative yet union-dominant federalism.

Suggestions to improve:

  • Could strengthen by suggesting reform measures (e.g., "Future reforms could consider making state consent mandatory for name changes to enhance true cooperative federalism, similar to German federal model where Länder have greater say in territorial matters")

Strong structural answer with excellent use of recent examples and visual aid. However, the institutional roles of State Legislature and Parliament need deeper examination as specifically demanded by the question.

Demand of the Question

  • Constitutional procedure for renaming a State
  • Role of State Legislature in the process
  • Role of Parliament in the process
  • Connection to cooperative yet asymmetrical federalism

What you wrote:

Recent proposal such as the demand to rename Kerala as "Keralam" (2023-25 resolution) and earlier changes like Orissa → Odisha (2011) highlight how renaming states reflects India's cooperative yet asymmetrical federal structure.

[DRAWING: A flowchart with the title "Renaming Process". The flow is as follows: "State Resolution" points to "President Refers to State Legislature" which points to "Opinion Sent to Parliament". An arrow points downwards from "Opinion Sent to Parliament" to "Parliament Passes Bill (Art. 3)". An arrow points from "Parliament Passes Bill (Art. 3)" to "Presidential Assent", which then points to a box labeled "New Name".]

Recent proposal such as the demand to rename Kerala as "Keralam" (2023-25 resolution) and earlier changes like Orissa → Odisha (2011) highlight how renaming states reflects India's cooperative yet asymmetrical federal structure.

[DRAWING: A flowchart with the title "Renaming Process". The flow is as follows: "State Resolution" points to "President Refers to State Legislature" which points to "Opinion Sent to Parliament". An arrow points downwards from "Opinion Sent to Parliament" to "Parliament Passes Bill (Art. 3)". An arrow points from "Parliament Passes Bill (Art. 3)" to "Presidential Assent", which then points to a box labeled "New Name".]

Suggestions to improve:

  • Could strengthen by briefly defining cooperative federalism (shared decision-making between Centre and States) and asymmetrical federalism (unequal power distribution favoring Centre) upfront for conceptual clarity.

More Challenges

View All
  • GS2

    SOCIAL_ISSUES_AND_SCHEMES

    26 May, 2026

    “India’s ageing population requires a transition from welfare-based support to a technology-enabled and institutionalized care ecosystem.”

    Discuss the significance of the JEEVAN mobile application and the SHATAYU dashboard in strengthening elderly welfare and geriatric care in India. Also examine the challenges in ensuring inclusive elderly care delivery.

    View Challenge
  • GS2

    Indian Polity

    Yesterday

    “India’s declining birth rate and infant mortality rate reflect an ongoing demographic transition, yet persistent rural-urban disparities continue to challenge inclusive human development.”
    In the light of the latest Sample Registration Survey (SRS) 2024 findings, critically examine the trends in India’s demographic indicators and discuss the policy measures needed to address regional and rural-urban inequalities.

    View Challenge
  • GS3

    Economy

    24 May, 2026

    “Balanced fertilizer use and soil test-based nutrient management are essential for ensuring sustainable agricultural productivity in India.”
    In this context, discuss the significance of the Khet Bachao Abhiyan launched by ICAR. Also examine the challenges in promoting sustainable nutrient management among Indian farmers.

    View Challenge
SuperKalam
SuperKalam is your personal mentor for UPSC preparation, guiding you at every step of the exam journey.

Download the App

Get it on Google PlayDownload on the App Store
Follow us

ⓒ Snapstack Technologies Private Limited