Topper’s Copy

GS2

Indian Polity

10 marks

“Changing the name of a State in India reflects the cooperative yet asymmetrical nature of Indian federalism.”
Discuss the constitutional procedure for renaming a State and examine the role played by the State Legislature and Parliament in this process.

Student’s Answer

Evaluation by SuperKalam

icon

Score:

5.5/10

0
3
6
10

Demand of the Question

  • Constitutional procedure for renaming a State
  • Role of State Legislature in the process
  • Role of Parliament in the process
  • Connection to cooperative yet asymmetrical federalism

What you wrote:

Recent proposal such as the demand to rename Kerala as "Keralam" (2023-25 resolution) and earlier changes like Orissa → Odisha (2011) highlight how renaming states reflects India's cooperative yet asymmetrical federal structure.

[DRAWING: A flowchart with the title "Renaming Process". The flow is as follows: "State Resolution" points to "President Refers to State Legislature" which points to "Opinion Sent to Parliament". An arrow points downwards from "Opinion Sent to Parliament" to "Parliament Passes Bill (Art. 3)". An arrow points from "Parliament Passes Bill (Art. 3)" to "Presidential Assent", which then points to a box labeled "New Name".]

Recent proposal such as the demand to rename Kerala as "Keralam" (2023-25 resolution) and earlier changes like Orissa → Odisha (2011) highlight how renaming states reflects India's cooperative yet asymmetrical federal structure.

[DRAWING: A flowchart with the title "Renaming Process". The flow is as follows: "State Resolution" points to "President Refers to State Legislature" which points to "Opinion Sent to Parliament". An arrow points downwards from "Opinion Sent to Parliament" to "Parliament Passes Bill (Art. 3)". An arrow points from "Parliament Passes Bill (Art. 3)" to "Presidential Assent", which then points to a box labeled "New Name".]

Suggestions to improve:

  • Could strengthen by briefly defining cooperative federalism (shared decision-making between Centre and States) and asymmetrical federalism (unequal power distribution favoring Centre) upfront for conceptual clarity.

What you wrote:

Constitutional Procedure (Article 3)
1.) Bill introduced only in Parliament.
2.) President refers it to concerned State legislature.
3.) State gives its views (not binding) within specified time.
4.) Parliament passes Bill by Simple majority.
5.) Presidential assent finalizes change.

Federal Nature Reflected
Cooperative Aspect
(i) States opinion is sought before change.
(ii) Reflects democratic consultation.

Asymmetrical Aspect
(i) Parliament is not bound by the State's opinion.
(ii) Final power lies with the Union.

Role of Institutions
'State Legislature': Expresses regional identity and political will.
'Parliament': Ensures national unity and Constitutional uniformity.

Constitutional Procedure (Article 3)
1.) Bill introduced only in Parliament.
2.) President refers it to concerned State legislature.
3.) State gives its views (not binding) within specified time.
4.) Parliament passes Bill by Simple majority.
5.) Presidential assent finalizes change.

Federal Nature Reflected
Cooperative Aspect
(i) States opinion is sought before change.
(ii) Reflects democratic consultation.

Asymmetrical Aspect
(i) Parliament is not bound by the State's opinion.
(ii) Final power lies with the Union.

Role of Institutions
'State Legislature': Expresses regional identity and political will.
'Parliament': Ensures national unity and Constitutional uniformity.

Suggestions to improve:

  • Could elaborate on Article 3's specific provisions (e.g., "Parliament can alter boundaries, names of states under Article 3 without requiring state consent, unlike Article 368 for constitutional amendments")
  • Could mention time frame specifications (e.g., "President typically gives states 3-6 months to respond, as seen in Telangana formation process")
  • Could expand on State Legislature's role (e.g., "State Assembly can pass resolutions expressing popular will, as Kerala did unanimously for 'Keralam', but lacks constitutional veto power")
  • Could detail Parliament's role (e.g., "Both Houses of Parliament must pass the bill by simple majority, unlike special majority needed for constitutional amendments, showing Centre's dominance in territorial matters")
  • Could add examples of divergent outcomes (e.g., "Gorkhaland demand shows how state opposition can delay but not prevent Union decisions")

What you wrote:

Recent resolution by Kerala Assembly (2023-25) to rename the State as "Keralam" revives debate on Article 3 and India's cooperative yet union-dominant federalism.

Recent resolution by Kerala Assembly (2023-25) to rename the State as "Keralam" revives debate on Article 3 and India's cooperative yet union-dominant federalism.

Suggestions to improve:

  • Could strengthen by suggesting reform measures (e.g., "Future reforms could consider making state consent mandatory for name changes to enhance true cooperative federalism, similar to German federal model where Länder have greater say in territorial matters")

Strong structural answer with excellent use of recent examples and visual aid. However, the institutional roles of State Legislature and Parliament need deeper examination as specifically demanded by the question.

Demand of the Question

  • Constitutional procedure for renaming a State
  • Role of State Legislature in the process
  • Role of Parliament in the process
  • Connection to cooperative yet asymmetrical federalism

What you wrote:

Recent proposal such as the demand to rename Kerala as "Keralam" (2023-25 resolution) and earlier changes like Orissa → Odisha (2011) highlight how renaming states reflects India's cooperative yet asymmetrical federal structure.

[DRAWING: A flowchart with the title "Renaming Process". The flow is as follows: "State Resolution" points to "President Refers to State Legislature" which points to "Opinion Sent to Parliament". An arrow points downwards from "Opinion Sent to Parliament" to "Parliament Passes Bill (Art. 3)". An arrow points from "Parliament Passes Bill (Art. 3)" to "Presidential Assent", which then points to a box labeled "New Name".]

Recent proposal such as the demand to rename Kerala as "Keralam" (2023-25 resolution) and earlier changes like Orissa → Odisha (2011) highlight how renaming states reflects India's cooperative yet asymmetrical federal structure.

[DRAWING: A flowchart with the title "Renaming Process". The flow is as follows: "State Resolution" points to "President Refers to State Legislature" which points to "Opinion Sent to Parliament". An arrow points downwards from "Opinion Sent to Parliament" to "Parliament Passes Bill (Art. 3)". An arrow points from "Parliament Passes Bill (Art. 3)" to "Presidential Assent", which then points to a box labeled "New Name".]

Suggestions to improve:

  • Could strengthen by briefly defining cooperative federalism (shared decision-making between Centre and States) and asymmetrical federalism (unequal power distribution favoring Centre) upfront for conceptual clarity.

More Challenges

View All
  • GS3

    Economy

    3 Jun, 2026

    The Government of India has revised the base year of the Wholesale Price Index (WPI) from 2011–12 to 2022–23 and expanded its coverage to include emerging sectors such as renewable energy. Discuss the significance of revising the base year of price indices. How can an updated WPI improve economic policymaking and inflation measurement in India?

    View Challenge
  • GS3

    Science & Technology

    Yesterday

    The emergence of zoonotic and vector-borne diseases in wildlife habitats poses significant challenges to biodiversity conservation and ecosystem management. In the context of the recent Babesia infection-related deaths of Asiatic lion cubs in Gir National Park, discuss the causes, ecological implications, and management strategies for controlling such diseases in protected areas.

    View Challenge
  • GS3

    Science & Technology

    1 Jun, 2026

    “Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) communication technology has the potential to transform road safety, intelligent transport systems, and autonomous mobility in India.”

    Discuss the significance of V2X technology in improving urban transportation and road safety. Also examine the regulatory, infrastructural, and cybersecurity challenges associated with its implementation in India.

    View Challenge
SuperKalam
SuperKalam is your personal mentor for UPSC preparation, guiding you at every step of the exam journey.

Download the App

Get it on Google PlayDownload on the App Store
Follow us

ⓒ Snapstack Technologies Private Limited