Score:
5.5/10
Analyze what earned this score 🔥
Topper’s Copy
GS2
Indian Polity
10 marks
“Changing the name of a State in India reflects the cooperative yet asymmetrical nature of Indian federalism.”
Discuss the constitutional procedure for renaming a State and examine the role played by the State Legislature and Parliament in this process.
Student’s Answer
Evaluation by SuperKalam
Demand of the Question
- Constitutional procedure for renaming a State
- Role of State Legislature in the process
- Role of Parliament in the process
- Connection to cooperative yet asymmetrical federalism
What you wrote:
Recent proposal such as the demand to rename Kerala as "Keralam" (2023-25 resolution) and earlier changes like Orissa → Odisha (2011) highlight how renaming states reflects India's cooperative yet asymmetrical federal structure.
[DRAWING: A flowchart with the title "Renaming Process". The flow is as follows: "State Resolution" points to "President Refers to State Legislature" which points to "Opinion Sent to Parliament". An arrow points downwards from "Opinion Sent to Parliament" to "Parliament Passes Bill (Art. 3)". An arrow points from "Parliament Passes Bill (Art. 3)" to "Presidential Assent", which then points to a box labeled "New Name".]
Recent proposal such as the demand to rename Kerala as "Keralam" (2023-25 resolution) and earlier changes like Orissa → Odisha (2011) highlight how renaming states reflects India's cooperative yet asymmetrical federal structure.
[DRAWING: A flowchart with the title "Renaming Process". The flow is as follows: "State Resolution" points to "President Refers to State Legislature" which points to "Opinion Sent to Parliament". An arrow points downwards from "Opinion Sent to Parliament" to "Parliament Passes Bill (Art. 3)". An arrow points from "Parliament Passes Bill (Art. 3)" to "Presidential Assent", which then points to a box labeled "New Name".]
Suggestions to improve:
- Could strengthen by briefly defining cooperative federalism (shared decision-making between Centre and States) and asymmetrical federalism (unequal power distribution favoring Centre) upfront for conceptual clarity.
What you wrote:
Constitutional Procedure (Article 3)
1.) Bill introduced only in Parliament.
2.) President refers it to concerned State legislature.
3.) State gives its views (not binding) within specified time.
4.) Parliament passes Bill by Simple majority.
5.) Presidential assent finalizes change.
Federal Nature Reflected
Cooperative Aspect
(i) States opinion is sought before change.
(ii) Reflects democratic consultation.
Asymmetrical Aspect
(i) Parliament is not bound by the State's opinion.
(ii) Final power lies with the Union.
Role of Institutions
'State Legislature': Expresses regional identity and political will.
'Parliament': Ensures national unity and Constitutional uniformity.
Constitutional Procedure (Article 3)
1.) Bill introduced only in Parliament.
2.) President refers it to concerned State legislature.
3.) State gives its views (not binding) within specified time.
4.) Parliament passes Bill by Simple majority.
5.) Presidential assent finalizes change.
Federal Nature Reflected
Cooperative Aspect
(i) States opinion is sought before change.
(ii) Reflects democratic consultation.
Asymmetrical Aspect
(i) Parliament is not bound by the State's opinion.
(ii) Final power lies with the Union.
Role of Institutions
'State Legislature': Expresses regional identity and political will.
'Parliament': Ensures national unity and Constitutional uniformity.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could elaborate on Article 3's specific provisions (e.g., "Parliament can alter boundaries, names of states under Article 3 without requiring state consent, unlike Article 368 for constitutional amendments")
- Could mention time frame specifications (e.g., "President typically gives states 3-6 months to respond, as seen in Telangana formation process")
- Could expand on State Legislature's role (e.g., "State Assembly can pass resolutions expressing popular will, as Kerala did unanimously for 'Keralam', but lacks constitutional veto power")
- Could detail Parliament's role (e.g., "Both Houses of Parliament must pass the bill by simple majority, unlike special majority needed for constitutional amendments, showing Centre's dominance in territorial matters")
- Could add examples of divergent outcomes (e.g., "Gorkhaland demand shows how state opposition can delay but not prevent Union decisions")
What you wrote:
Recent resolution by Kerala Assembly (2023-25) to rename the State as "Keralam" revives debate on Article 3 and India's cooperative yet union-dominant federalism.
Recent resolution by Kerala Assembly (2023-25) to rename the State as "Keralam" revives debate on Article 3 and India's cooperative yet union-dominant federalism.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could strengthen by suggesting reform measures (e.g., "Future reforms could consider making state consent mandatory for name changes to enhance true cooperative federalism, similar to German federal model where Länder have greater say in territorial matters")
Strong structural answer with excellent use of recent examples and visual aid. However, the institutional roles of State Legislature and Parliament need deeper examination as specifically demanded by the question.
Demand of the Question
- Constitutional procedure for renaming a State
- Role of State Legislature in the process
- Role of Parliament in the process
- Connection to cooperative yet asymmetrical federalism
What you wrote:
Recent proposal such as the demand to rename Kerala as "Keralam" (2023-25 resolution) and earlier changes like Orissa → Odisha (2011) highlight how renaming states reflects India's cooperative yet asymmetrical federal structure.
[DRAWING: A flowchart with the title "Renaming Process". The flow is as follows: "State Resolution" points to "President Refers to State Legislature" which points to "Opinion Sent to Parliament". An arrow points downwards from "Opinion Sent to Parliament" to "Parliament Passes Bill (Art. 3)". An arrow points from "Parliament Passes Bill (Art. 3)" to "Presidential Assent", which then points to a box labeled "New Name".]
Recent proposal such as the demand to rename Kerala as "Keralam" (2023-25 resolution) and earlier changes like Orissa → Odisha (2011) highlight how renaming states reflects India's cooperative yet asymmetrical federal structure.
[DRAWING: A flowchart with the title "Renaming Process". The flow is as follows: "State Resolution" points to "President Refers to State Legislature" which points to "Opinion Sent to Parliament". An arrow points downwards from "Opinion Sent to Parliament" to "Parliament Passes Bill (Art. 3)". An arrow points from "Parliament Passes Bill (Art. 3)" to "Presidential Assent", which then points to a box labeled "New Name".]
Suggestions to improve:
- Could strengthen by briefly defining cooperative federalism (shared decision-making between Centre and States) and asymmetrical federalism (unequal power distribution favoring Centre) upfront for conceptual clarity.
More Challenges
View All- View Challenge
GS2
Indian Polity
27 Feb, 2026
The balance between transparency and privacy is a recurring constitutional challenge in India.
In the light of recent amendments to the RTI framework through the Digital Personal Data Protection law, examine whether the exemption of personal information undermines accountability of public authorities. - View Challenge
GS3
Economy
25 Feb, 2026
“Asset monetisation has emerged as a critical pillar of India’s infrastructure financing strategy.”
In this context, critically examine the objectives, mechanisms and challenges of the National Monetisation Pipeline 2.0 (NMP 2.0). How can it contribute to sustainable infrastructure development while safeguarding public interest? - View Challenge
GS3
Internal Security
24 Feb, 2026
“Modern terrorism is increasingly technology-driven rather than territory-driven.”
Examine this statement in the context of recent counter-terrorism challenges faced by India.
