Score:
9.5/15
Analyze what earned this score 🔥
Topper’s Copy
GS2
Indian Polity
15 marks
Examine the role of protests and hunger strikes in strengthening democratic accountability in India. Discuss the constitutional, ethical and governance challenges associated with their use in a constitutional democracy, with suitable examples.
Student’s Answer
Evaluation by SuperKalam
Demand of the Question
- Role of protests/hunger strikes in strengthening democratic accountability
- Constitutional challenges in their use
- Ethical challenges in their use
- Governance challenges in their use
What you wrote:
Protests and hunger strikes are time-tested instruments of peaceful democratic dissent. Rooted in India's constitutional ethos and Gandhian tradition, they enable citizens to hold governments accountable between elections while ensuring participatory democracy.
Protests and hunger strikes are time-tested instruments of peaceful democratic dissent. Rooted in India's constitutional ethos and Gandhian tradition, they enable citizens to hold governments accountable between elections while ensuring participatory democracy.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could briefly mention the constitutional basis more specifically (e.g., "Article 19 guarantees freedom of speech and assembly, enabling citizens to hold governments accountable through peaceful dissent").
What you wrote:
Role in strengthening democratic accountability
1) Voice to citizens: Enable articulation of public grievances under Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(b).
2) Checks executive excesses: Pressurise governments to review unpopular laws and policies.
3) Catalyse policy reforms: Anna Hazare's anti-corruption movement accelerated the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013.
4) Protect marginalised interests: Irom Sharmila's hunger strike drew sustained attention to AFSPA-related concerns.
5) Promote participatory governance: Farmers' protests culminated in repeal of the three farm laws, reflecting democratic responsiveness.
Role in strengthening democratic accountability
1) Voice to citizens: Enable articulation of public grievances under Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(b).
2) Checks executive excesses: Pressurise governments to review unpopular laws and policies.
3) Catalyse policy reforms: Anna Hazare's anti-corruption movement accelerated the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013.
4) Protect marginalised interests: Irom Sharmila's hunger strike drew sustained attention to AFSPA-related concerns.
5) Promote participatory governance: Farmers' protests culminated in repeal of the three farm laws, reflecting democratic responsiveness.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could elaborate on how protests create direct accountability mechanisms (e.g., RTI movement leading to Right to Information Act 2005, making government information accessible)
- Can add how protests serve as early warning systems for policy failures (e.g., CAA-NRC protests highlighting concerns about citizenship documentation before full implementation)
What you wrote:
Challenges
Constitutional
1) Right to protest is not absolute, subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2) & 19(3) for public order and security.
2) Balancing Article 21 with the State's duty to preserve life during prolonged hunger strikes creates constitutional dilemmas.
Ethical
1) Hunger strikes invoke moral persuasion but may also create emotional pressure on democratic institutions.
2) Raises questions regarding bodily autonomy, informed consent and the ethics of force-feeding.
Governance
1) Disruption of public services and economic activity.
2) Risk of politicisation, misinformation and violent infiltration into otherwise peaceful protests.
3) Administrative challenge of balancing civil liberties with maintenance of law & order.
Challenges
Constitutional
1) Right to protest is not absolute, subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2) & 19(3) for public order and security.
2) Balancing Article 21 with the State's duty to preserve life during prolonged hunger strikes creates constitutional dilemmas.
Ethical
1) Hunger strikes invoke moral persuasion but may also create emotional pressure on democratic institutions.
2) Raises questions regarding bodily autonomy, informed consent and the ethics of force-feeding.
Governance
1) Disruption of public services and economic activity.
2) Risk of politicisation, misinformation and violent infiltration into otherwise peaceful protests.
3) Administrative challenge of balancing civil liberties with maintenance of law & order.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could strengthen constitutional challenges with judicial precedents (e.g., Ramlila Maidan incident case where Supreme Court emphasized peaceful protest rights while upholding reasonable restrictions)
- Can elaborate governance challenges with specific examples (e.g., Delhi borders during farmers' protests requiring massive security deployment, affecting normal traffic and economic activity)
- Could discuss legal frameworks for managing protests (e.g., Section 144 CrPC provisions and their constitutional validity)
What you wrote:
In a constitutional democracy, peaceful protests and hunger strikes complement representative institutions by fostering accountability. Their legitimacy depends on balancing democratic dissent with constitutional order, public welfare and the rule of law.
In a constitutional democracy, peaceful protests and hunger strikes complement representative institutions by fostering accountability. Their legitimacy depends on balancing democratic dissent with constitutional order, public welfare and the rule of law.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could conclude with forward-looking perspective (e.g., "Digital platforms now enable virtual protests, requiring updated legal frameworks while preserving democratic dissent traditions established since independence").
Your answer demonstrates strong conceptual understanding and systematic coverage of all demands. The constitutional grounding is solid, though governance challenges could benefit from more specific examples and administrative details to enhance practical understanding.
Demand of the Question
- Role of protests/hunger strikes in strengthening democratic accountability
- Constitutional challenges in their use
- Ethical challenges in their use
- Governance challenges in their use
What you wrote:
Protests and hunger strikes are time-tested instruments of peaceful democratic dissent. Rooted in India's constitutional ethos and Gandhian tradition, they enable citizens to hold governments accountable between elections while ensuring participatory democracy.
Protests and hunger strikes are time-tested instruments of peaceful democratic dissent. Rooted in India's constitutional ethos and Gandhian tradition, they enable citizens to hold governments accountable between elections while ensuring participatory democracy.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could briefly mention the constitutional basis more specifically (e.g., "Article 19 guarantees freedom of speech and assembly, enabling citizens to hold governments accountable through peaceful dissent").
More Challenges
View All- View Challenge
GS2
Indian Polity
13 Aug, 2026
The FCRA Amendment Bill, 2026 seeks to strengthen state oversight over foreign-funded organisations while raising concerns about civil society autonomy. Critically examine.
- View Challenge
GS3
Economy
Yesterday
The next phase of India's MSME growth lies not merely in creating more enterprises, but in clustering them. Examine how a cluster-based approach can enhance the productivity and global competitiveness of Indian MSMEs.
- View Challenge
GS2
Social Justice
11 Aug, 2026
The demand for Scheduled Caste status for Dalit Christians raises complex questions of caste discrimination, religious freedom and affirmative action. Critically examine the constitutional and socio-legal dimensions of this debate.
SuperKalam is your personal mentor for UPSC preparation, guiding you at every step of the exam journey.
Download the App
STUDY RESOURCES
CONTACT US
ⓒ Snapstack Technologies Private Limited