Topper’s Copy

GS2

International Relations

15 marks

In an increasingly fragmented geopolitical order, regional multilateral organisations have become important instruments for advancing national interests and strategic autonomy. Examine the significance of India’s engagement with such groupings and the challenges in forging consensus within them.

Student’s Answer

Evaluation by SuperKalam

icon

Score:

9/15

0
5
10
15

Demand of the Question

  • Significance of India's engagement with regional multilateral organizations
  • Challenges in forging consensus within these groupings
  • Context of fragmented geopolitical order and how these organizations serve as instruments for national interests/strategic autonomy

What you wrote:

Ans. In an increasingly fragmented geopolitical order, regional multilateral organisations have emerged as critical arena for diplomacy.

Ans. In an increasingly fragmented geopolitical order, regional multilateral organisations have emerged as critical arena for diplomacy.

Suggestions to improve:

  • Could strengthen by briefly defining what constitutes regional multilateral organizations (e.g., "Regional multilateral organizations like QUAD, SCO, and BIMSTEC have emerged as vital platforms for middle powers like India to navigate great power competition while preserving strategic autonomy").

What you wrote:

SIGNIFICANCE OF INDIA'S ENGAGEMENT WITH REGIONAL GROUPINGS

1. Counterbalancing:

→ QUAD → 1) vital platform to ensure free, open, inclusive Indo Pacific

2) Counters China's assertiveness in Indian Ocean Region (IOR) and South China Sea.

2. Counter regional Terrorism:

→ SCO → allows India to counter regional terrorism via RATS, and have a foothold in Eurasia.

3. Strengthen Regional Integration:

→ BIMSTEC → acts as a link b/w South Asia and South East Asia, directly linking to India's 'Neighbourhood First' and 'Act East' policies.

4. Reinforces India role as a net security provider in IOR. → e.g. IORA aligns with India's SAGAR vision.

5. Secure energy supplies:

→ SCO allows India to secure uranium for its domestic Pressurised Heavy Water Reactors and civil energy use.

SIGNIFICANCE OF INDIA'S ENGAGEMENT WITH REGIONAL GROUPINGS

1. Counterbalancing:

→ QUAD → 1) vital platform to ensure free, open, inclusive Indo Pacific

2) Counters China's assertiveness in Indian Ocean Region (IOR) and South China Sea.

2. Counter regional Terrorism:

→ SCO → allows India to counter regional terrorism via RATS, and have a foothold in Eurasia.

3. Strengthen Regional Integration:

→ BIMSTEC → acts as a link b/w South Asia and South East Asia, directly linking to India's 'Neighbourhood First' and 'Act East' policies.

4. Reinforces India role as a net security provider in IOR. → e.g. IORA aligns with India's SAGAR vision.

5. Secure energy supplies:

→ SCO allows India to secure uranium for its domestic Pressurised Heavy Water Reactors and civil energy use.

Suggestions to improve:

  • Could elaborate on strategic autonomy aspect (e.g., "India's participation in SCO allows it to engage with Russia and Central Asia independently of Western pressure, demonstrating strategic autonomy during the Ukraine conflict")
  • Can strengthen the IORA point by mentioning specific initiatives (e.g., "**Indian Ocean Naval Symposium (IONS)** facilitates maritime security cooperation among 25 navies")
  • Could add economic significance (e.g., "ASEAN-India trade reached **$131 billion** in recent years, showcasing economic integration benefits")

What you wrote:

CHALLENGES IN FORGING CONSENSUS

1) Divergent Strategic Objectives of member states:

[FLOWCHART: Central node "SCO" with two diverging arrows. Left arrow leads to "India's objectives" which points down to "Central Asian connectivity". Right arrow leads to "China's objectives" which points down to "promote Belt and Road Initiative".]

2) Routine hedging of smaller member states (like Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Maldives) between dominant powers like India and China in BIMSTEC and IORA, affect regional security.

3) Internal geopolitical rivalries paralyze multilateral agendas. e.g. India-Pakistan historical baggage froze SAARC.

4) Political instability in a member state leads to slow implementation of connectivity projects. e.g. Kaladan Multimodal Transit Transport Project in Myanmar.

CHALLENGES IN FORGING CONSENSUS

1) Divergent Strategic Objectives of member states:

[FLOWCHART: Central node "SCO" with two diverging arrows. Left arrow leads to "India's objectives" which points down to "Central Asian connectivity". Right arrow leads to "China's objectives" which points down to "promote Belt and Road Initiative".]

2) Routine hedging of smaller member states (like Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Maldives) between dominant powers like India and China in BIMSTEC and IORA, affect regional security.

3) Internal geopolitical rivalries paralyze multilateral agendas. e.g. India-Pakistan historical baggage froze SAARC.

4) Political instability in a member state leads to slow implementation of connectivity projects. e.g. Kaladan Multimodal Transit Transport Project in Myanmar.

Suggestions to improve:

  • Could discuss consensus mechanisms (e.g., "ASEAN's consensus-based decision-making often leads to **lowest common denominator** outcomes, limiting bold initiatives")
  • Can add examples of US-China rivalry impact (e.g., "Growing US-China competition has made ASEAN members cautious about taking sides, affecting initiatives like the **Code of Conduct in South China Sea**")
  • Could mention resource constraints (e.g., "Limited financial resources in organizations like **BIMSTEC** (annual budget of only $1 million) hamper project implementation")

What you wrote:

WAY FORWARD

1) India must ensure timely execution of cross border infrastructure within BIMSTEC, BBIN to provide a viable alternative to China's BRI.

2) Supplement security diplomacy with deeper economic integration through FTAs.

3) Leverage India's indigenous Bhashini AI for digital soft power in regional forums to bridge language barrier.

WAY FORWARD

1) India must ensure timely execution of cross border infrastructure within BIMSTEC, BBIN to provide a viable alternative to China's BRI.

2) Supplement security diplomacy with deeper economic integration through FTAs.

3) Leverage India's indigenous Bhashini AI for digital soft power in regional forums to bridge language barrier.

Suggestions to improve:

  • Could add institutional reforms (e.g., "India can advocate for **flexible geometry approaches** in BIMSTEC, allowing willing members to proceed with specific projects")
  • Can suggest confidence-building measures (e.g., "Regular **Track-II diplomacy** initiatives and parliamentary exchanges can help build trust among member states")

What you wrote:

Engaging with regional forums is important for India to secure its strategic autonomy, expand its geopolitical footprint, promote international peace (Article 51) and become Viksit Bharat by 2047.

Engaging with regional forums is important for India to secure its strategic autonomy, expand its geopolitical footprint, promote international peace (Article 51) and become Viksit Bharat by 2047.

Suggestions to improve:

  • Could emphasize India's unique position (e.g., "As the world's largest democracy and fastest-growing major economy, India's leadership in regional multilateralism can offer an alternative model to both Western-led and China-centric frameworks").

The answer demonstrates good understanding of regional multilateralism with relevant examples and clear structure. However, it could better emphasize the strategic autonomy dimension and provide more specific institutional details to strengthen the analysis.

Demand of the Question

  • Significance of India's engagement with regional multilateral organizations
  • Challenges in forging consensus within these groupings
  • Context of fragmented geopolitical order and how these organizations serve as instruments for national interests/strategic autonomy

What you wrote:

Ans. In an increasingly fragmented geopolitical order, regional multilateral organisations have emerged as critical arena for diplomacy.

Ans. In an increasingly fragmented geopolitical order, regional multilateral organisations have emerged as critical arena for diplomacy.

Suggestions to improve:

  • Could strengthen by briefly defining what constitutes regional multilateral organizations (e.g., "Regional multilateral organizations like QUAD, SCO, and BIMSTEC have emerged as vital platforms for middle powers like India to navigate great power competition while preserving strategic autonomy").

More Challenges

View All
  • GS2

    Indian Polity

    Yesterday

    The recent Bihar–Jharkhand agreement on sharing the Sone River waters demonstrates the potential of negotiated mechanisms in resolving inter-State water disputes. Examine the challenges associated with inter-State river water governance in India and suggest measures for their cooperative resolution.

    View Challenge
  • GS2

    International Relations

    3 Sept, 2026

    The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation provides India both a platform for deeper Eurasian engagement and a forum marked by significant strategic contradictions. In light of the recent SCO Summit, examine the significance of the organisation for India and the challenges that constrain its effectiveness.

    View Challenge
  • GS3

    Economy

    2 Sept, 2026

    India’s latest GDP numbers indicate resilient growth alongside signs of an emerging investment cycle. Examine the drivers of India’s recent economic growth and assess whether it can translate into a sustained private investment boom.

    View Challenge
SuperKalam
SuperKalam is your personal mentor for UPSC preparation, guiding you at every step of the exam journey.

Download the App

Get it on Google PlayDownload on the App Store
Follow us

ⓒ Snapstack Technologies Private Limited