Score:
7/10
Analyze what earned this score 🔥
Topper’s Copy
GS3
Disaster Management
10 marks
Stampedes at large public gatherings remain a major disaster management challenge in India. Discuss their major causes and suggest measures to prevent such incidents.
Student’s Answer
Evaluation by SuperKalam
Demand of the Question
- Why stampedes remain a big disaster challenge in India
- What major causes trigger stampedes at public gatherings
- What measures are needed to prevent future stampede incidents
What you wrote:
Ans -> Stampede at religious political and sporting gatherings, such as Hathras (2024) and the Prayagraj Mahakumbh (2025), expose gaps in crowd governance and threaten the right to life under Article 21.
Ans -> Stampede at religious political and sporting gatherings, such as Hathras (2024) and the Prayagraj Mahakumbh (2025), expose gaps in crowd governance and threaten the right to life under Article 21.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could briefly explain why managing very large gatherings becomes difficult, rather than adding another incident.
What you wrote:
Major causes
(1) Poor Planning :-
No capacity estimation, single entry/exit and weak barricading create bottlenecks.
(2) Panic triggers :-
Rumours, heat, power failure or VIP movement cause sudden surges.
(3) Weak enforcement :-
Unauthorised gathering, lack permissions and overlapping agencies dilute accountability
(4) Crowd behaviour :-
Herd mentality, religious fervour and low risk awareness.
Major causes
(1) Poor Planning :-
No capacity estimation, single entry/exit and weak barricading create bottlenecks.
(2) Panic triggers :-
Rumours, heat, power failure or VIP movement cause sudden surges.
(3) Weak enforcement :-
Unauthorised gathering, lack permissions and overlapping agencies dilute accountability
(4) Crowd behaviour :-
Herd mentality, religious fervour and low risk awareness.
Suggestions to improve:
- Can show a short causal chain: overcrowding at a bottleneck restricts movement, increases pressure and leaves people unable to escape.
- Could separate unsafe conditions, such as excess density, from sudden triggers, such as rumours or power failure.
- Can explain how unclear directions make people move towards the same route, rather than treating crowd behaviour as an independent failure.
What you wrote:
Way forward
(1) Planning :-
Event specific plans with capacity based permission, as per NDMA's 2014 crowd management guidelines.
(2) Technology :-
CCTV, drones and AI based density monitering with real-time alerts.
(3) Infastructure :-
Seperate entry-exist routes, holding areas one-way flow and staggered timings.
(4) Institutions :-
Single Incident command center, trained volunteers, medical readiness and mock drills.
(5) Accountability :-
Organiser liability and mandatory post-incidents audits.
Way forward
(1) Planning :-
Event specific plans with capacity based permission, as per NDMA's 2014 crowd management guidelines.
(2) Technology :-
CCTV, drones and AI based density monitering with real-time alerts.
(3) Infastructure :-
Seperate entry-exist routes, holding areas one-way flow and staggered timings.
(4) Institutions :-
Single Incident command center, trained volunteers, medical readiness and mock drills.
(5) Accountability :-
Organiser liability and mandatory post-incidents audits.
Suggestions to improve:
- Can link density alerts to controlled entry, temporary admission stops and diversion towards designated holding areas.
- Could add clear signboards and verified public announcements to guide movement and counter rumours.
- Can clarify that the command centre should assign responsibility for crowd-flow decisions and coordinate organisers, security personnel and medical teams.
What you wrote:
Shifting from reactive relief to preventive risk-informed crowd management, in line with the Sendai framework, can protect life and dignity at mass gatherings.
Shifting from reactive relief to preventive risk-informed crowd management, in line with the Sendai framework, can protect life and dignity at mass gatherings.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could make the closing outcome more concrete by emphasising safe entry, movement and dispersal.
Your answer is well organised and connects governance failures with practical prevention. Strengthen the crowd-pressure explanation, clarify responses to alerts, and address communication to make it more convincing.
Demand of the Question
- Why stampedes remain a big disaster challenge in India
- What major causes trigger stampedes at public gatherings
- What measures are needed to prevent future stampede incidents
What you wrote:
Ans -> Stampede at religious political and sporting gatherings, such as Hathras (2024) and the Prayagraj Mahakumbh (2025), expose gaps in crowd governance and threaten the right to life under Article 21.
Ans -> Stampede at religious political and sporting gatherings, such as Hathras (2024) and the Prayagraj Mahakumbh (2025), expose gaps in crowd governance and threaten the right to life under Article 21.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could briefly explain why managing very large gatherings becomes difficult, rather than adding another incident.
More Challenges
View All- View Challenge
GS2
International Relations
Yesterday
How do US sanctions on Russian oil affect India's energy security and strategic autonomy? Discuss the implications for India and suggest measures to address these challenges.
- View Challenge
GS4
Ethics: Theory
18 Oct, 2026
What is ethical leadership? Discuss its importance in corporate governance with suitable examples.
- View Challenge
GS3
Economy
17 Oct, 2026
India has made significant progress in ensuring food security, yet several challenges remain. Discuss the major initiatives taken by India to ensure food security and suggest measures to achieve sustainable food and nutritional security.
SuperKalam is your personal mentor for UPSC preparation, guiding you at every step of the exam journey.
Download the App
STUDY RESOURCES
CONTACT US
ⓒ Snapstack Technologies Private Limited