Score:
7.5/15
Analyze what earned this score 🔥
Topper’s Copy
GS2
Indian Polity
15 marks
“The right to safe travel on highways is intrinsic to Article 21 of the Constitution.” In light of recent judicial observations, critically examine the scope of the Right to Life and discuss the responsibilities of the State in ensuring road safety in India.
Student’s Answer
Evaluation by SuperKalam
Demand of the Question
- Critical examination of Article 21's scope regarding road safety
- Analysis of recent judicial observations linking safe travel to right to life
- Discussion of state responsibilities in ensuring road safety
- Critical evaluation of implementation challenges
What you wrote:
The Article 21 of the Indian constitution has been expansively interpreted by the Supreme Court of India to include a range of rights necessary for a dignified life. Recent judicial observations have emphasized that safe travel on highways is intrinsic to this right, linking road safety directly with the right to life.
The Article 21 of the Indian constitution has been expansively interpreted by the Supreme Court of India to include a range of rights necessary for a dignified life. Recent judicial observations have emphasized that safe travel on highways is intrinsic to this right, linking road safety directly with the right to life.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could strengthen by briefly mentioning the **transformative shift from negative to positive rights** under Article 21 (e.g., from 'state shall not deprive life' to 'state must ensure dignified life').
What you wrote:
Scope of Right to life under Article 21
The scope of Article 21 has evolved from mere animal existence to a right to live with dignity and safety:
a) Expanded interpretation: Includes health, environment, livelihood and safety.
b) Judicial Activism: In cases like M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, the court recognized state liability in preventing hazards.
c) Safe mobility as a right: Road safety is now seen as essential to protecting life, especially given rising accident fatalities.
Thus, unsafe roads, poor enforcement, and negligence can amount to a violation of Article 21.
Scope of Right to life under Article 21
The scope of Article 21 has evolved from mere animal existence to a right to live with dignity and safety:
a) Expanded interpretation: Includes health, environment, livelihood and safety.
b) Judicial Activism: In cases like M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, the court recognized state liability in preventing hazards.
c) Safe mobility as a right: Road safety is now seen as essential to protecting life, especially given rising accident fatalities.
Thus, unsafe roads, poor enforcement, and negligence can amount to a violation of Article 21.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could elaborate on **recent Supreme Court observations in highway safety cases** (e.g., court's suo moto cognizance of highway accidents leading to comprehensive safety guidelines)
- Can discuss the **judicial shift towards positive obligations** under Article 21, where courts now mandate proactive state action rather than mere non-interference
What you wrote:
State Responsibilities in Ensuring Road Safety
1) Legislative Measures
a) Implementation of laws like the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 (amended in 2019)
b) Strict penalties for violation such as drunk driving, overspeeding.
2) Infrastructure Development
a) Scientific road design, proper signage, lighting.
b) Identification and rectification of "black spots".
3) Enforcement Mechanisms:
a) Strong traffic policing and use of technology (CCTV, speed cameras)
b) Ensuring accountability of authorities for lapse.
4) Emergency Response System
a) Efficient trauma care and ambulance services.
b) Implementation of the 'Golden Hour' principle.
State Responsibilities in Ensuring Road Safety
1) Legislative Measures
a) Implementation of laws like the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 (amended in 2019)
b) Strict penalties for violation such as drunk driving, overspeeding.
2) Infrastructure Development
a) Scientific road design, proper signage, lighting.
b) Identification and rectification of "black spots".
3) Enforcement Mechanisms:
a) Strong traffic policing and use of technology (CCTV, speed cameras)
b) Ensuring accountability of authorities for lapse.
4) Emergency Response System
a) Efficient trauma care and ambulance services.
b) Implementation of the 'Golden Hour' principle.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could add **constitutional mandate under Article 21 read with Directive Principles** (e.g., Article 47 - duty to improve public health and Article 39(e) - protection of workers' health)
- Can include **inter-state coordination mechanisms** for highway safety (e.g., National Road Safety Council's role in policy coordination)
What you wrote:
Critical Evaluation
1) Implementation gaps: Despite laws, enforcement remains weak.
2) Institutional overlap: Multiple agencies lead to lack of coordination.
3) National Highways account for approximately 2% of India's total road length but contribute to nearly 30% of all road fatalities, highlighting a critical safety concern.
4) The ruling came in response to a suo moto case following accidents in Rajasthan and Telangana in November 2025 that caused 34 deaths.
5) The court prohibited new dhabas, eateries and commercial structures within the right of way of any National Highway.
6) Heavy vehicles are now restricted to parking only at designated bays and wayside amenities.
Critical Evaluation
1) Implementation gaps: Despite laws, enforcement remains weak.
2) Institutional overlap: Multiple agencies lead to lack of coordination.
3) National Highways account for approximately 2% of India's total road length but contribute to nearly 30% of all road fatalities, highlighting a critical safety concern.
4) The ruling came in response to a suo moto case following accidents in Rajasthan and Telangana in November 2025 that caused 34 deaths.
5) The court prohibited new dhabas, eateries and commercial structures within the right of way of any National Highway.
6) Heavy vehicles are now restricted to parking only at designated bays and wayside amenities.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could discuss **accountability mechanisms** under Article 21 (e.g., compensation for road accident victims as state duty, not charity)
- Can examine **technology integration challenges** (e.g., FASTag implementation improving highway monitoring but enforcement gaps remain)
What you wrote:
The recognition of safe highway travel as part of Article 21 reflects the dynamic nature of constitutional rights. It imposes a positive obligation on the state to ensure safe infrastructure, strict enforcement and public awareness. Strengthening governance and accountability mechanisms is crucial to truly realize the right to life in its fullest sense.
The recognition of safe highway travel as part of Article 21 reflects the dynamic nature of constitutional rights. It imposes a positive obligation on the state to ensure safe infrastructure, strict enforcement and public awareness. Strengthening governance and accountability mechanisms is crucial to truly realize the right to life in its fullest sense.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could conclude with **constitutional vision of road safety** (e.g., linking safe mobility to fundamental right to movement under Article 19(1)(d) alongside Article 21 for comprehensive protection).
Strong constitutional foundation with good recent examples and comprehensive coverage of state responsibilities. The statistical data and specific case references enhance credibility, though recent judicial observations could be better integrated throughout the analysis.
Demand of the Question
- Critical examination of Article 21's scope regarding road safety
- Analysis of recent judicial observations linking safe travel to right to life
- Discussion of state responsibilities in ensuring road safety
- Critical evaluation of implementation challenges
What you wrote:
The Article 21 of the Indian constitution has been expansively interpreted by the Supreme Court of India to include a range of rights necessary for a dignified life. Recent judicial observations have emphasized that safe travel on highways is intrinsic to this right, linking road safety directly with the right to life.
The Article 21 of the Indian constitution has been expansively interpreted by the Supreme Court of India to include a range of rights necessary for a dignified life. Recent judicial observations have emphasized that safe travel on highways is intrinsic to this right, linking road safety directly with the right to life.
Suggestions to improve:
- Could strengthen by briefly mentioning the **transformative shift from negative to positive rights** under Article 21 (e.g., from 'state shall not deprive life' to 'state must ensure dignified life').
More Challenges
View All- View Challenge
GS2
Indian Polity
25 May, 2026
“India’s declining birth rate and infant mortality rate reflect an ongoing demographic transition, yet persistent rural-urban disparities continue to challenge inclusive human development.”
In the light of the latest Sample Registration Survey (SRS) 2024 findings, critically examine the trends in India’s demographic indicators and discuss the policy measures needed to address regional and rural-urban inequalities. - View Challenge
GS3
Economy
Yesterday
“Balanced fertilizer use and soil test-based nutrient management are essential for ensuring sustainable agricultural productivity in India.”
In this context, discuss the significance of the Khet Bachao Abhiyan launched by ICAR. Also examine the challenges in promoting sustainable nutrient management among Indian farmers. - View Challenge
GS2
Indian Polity
23 May, 2026
“Repeated controversies surrounding NEET have exposed structural weaknesses in India’s centralized examination system.” Critically examine the challenges associated with NEET and suggest reforms to ensure transparency, equity, and accessibility in medical admissions.
SuperKalam is your personal mentor for UPSC preparation, guiding you at every step of the exam journey.
Download the App
STUDY RESOURCES
CONTACT US
ⓒ Snapstack Technologies Private Limited