China has filed a complaint against India at the World Trade Organization (WTO) regarding the Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme.
The complaint alleges that India's PLI scheme provides subsidies for advanced chemistry cell (ACC) batteries, the auto sector, and Electric Vehicle (EV) production.
China claims these subsidies are contingent on Domestic Value Addition (DVA), discriminating against Chinese goods.
The WTO's Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM) agreement regulates industrial subsidies to prevent unfair competition.
Detailed Insights:
India's PLI scheme, launched in 2020, aims to boost Indian manufacturing by providing financial incentives based on incremental sales to strategic industries.
The challenged PLI schemes include incentives for giga-scale ACC battery manufacturing, Advanced Automotive Technology (AAT) production, and attracting global EV manufacturers.
China argues that DVA requirements in these schemes incentivize the use of domestic goods over imported goods, violating WTO law.
WTO law prohibits Import Substitution (IS) subsidies, which are financial contributions contingent on using domestic goods over imported ones.
An IS subsidy can breach the national treatment obligation under GATT Article III.4 and Article 2.1 of the Trade Related Investment Measures (TRIMs) Agreement.
The WTO dispute resolution process begins with consultations between India and China; if unresolved, it proceeds to adjudication by a WTO panel.
The WTO's Appellate Body is currently incapacitated, potentially delaying the final resolution if the panel's decision is appealed.
Key Concepts Involved:
Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) Scheme: A scheme providing financial incentives to boost domestic manufacturing and attract investment.
Domestic Value Addition (DVA): The percentage of a product's value that is added domestically through manufacturing and other processes.
Import Substitution (IS) Subsidy: A subsidy contingent upon the use of domestic goods over imported goods.