The Economic Survey 2025-26 suggests re-examining the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005.
The survey proposes exempting disclosures on the deliberative process of policy making.
It suggests a ministerial veto with parliamentary oversight to prevent disclosures that might hinder governance.
The survey compares the RTI Act with similar laws in the US, UK, and Sweden, noting differences in exemptions.
Detailed Insights:
The survey acknowledges the RTI Act as a powerful tool for accountability but warns against it becoming an "end in itself".
It suggests exempting brainstorming notes, working papers, and draft comments until they become part of the final decision record.
The survey highlights that unlike the RTI Act, international laws often exempt internal personnel rules and inter-agency memos.
Concerns are raised that disclosing every draft or remark may lead officials to be cautious and avoid bold ideas.
The survey emphasizes the importance of officials being held accountable for decisions they endorse, not for every thought expressed during deliberation.
Key Concepts Involved:
Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005: Legislation providing citizens access to government-held information.
Deliberative Process: Internal discussions and consultations involved in policy formulation.
Ministerial Veto: The power of a minister to overrule or reject a decision, subject to oversight.