UPSC’s new rule: SC nod must for delay in choosing State DGPs, Pg14

Key Highlights:

• The UPSC has revised rules for empanelment of State Director-General of Police (DGP).
• State governments now require Supreme Court consent for delays in submitting DGP officer lists to the UPSC.
• The Supreme Court mandated proposals be sent to UPSC at least three months before the incumbent DGP's retirement.
• The UPSC sought legal opinion due to States delaying proposals and appointing Acting DGPs.

Detailed Insights:

• The Supreme Court has ruled against appointing any person on the post of Director-General of Police on an acting basis.
• Attorney-General R. Venkataramani stated that the delay by State governments in forwarding names for empanelment was excessive.
• The UPSC has stated that many States have been submitting proposals for convening the Empanelment Committee Meeting in violation of the Supreme Court directions.
• The amended UPSC order requires States to seek leave or clarification from the Supreme Court for delayed submission, except in cases of death, resignation, or premature relieving of DGP.

Key Concepts Involved:

• Director-General of Police (DGP): The highest-ranking police officer in a state or union territory.
• Empanelment: The process of creating a list of eligible candidates for a specific position.
• Union Public Service Commission (UPSC): India's premier central recruiting agency responsible for appointments to various civil services and posts.