A growing shadow over digital constitutionalism, Pg8
Digital constitutionalism urgently needed to protect citizens' rights amidst rising surveillance and algorithmic governance, ensuring accountability and transparency in the digital age.
The central government revoked its order mandating mobile phone manufacturers to install the 'Sanchar Saathi' app by 2026, following widespread privacy concerns.
Cybercrime cases in India increased from 15.9 lakh in 2023 to 20.4 lakh in 2024, prompting the initial push for the app as a safety measure.
Digital constitutionalism is needed to extend constitutional principles into the digital space, threatened by data collection, AI, and surveillance.
The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, intended to safeguard citizen data, has been criticized for broad governmental exemptions and weak individual remedies.
Detailed Insights:
Digital constitutionalism aims to apply constitutional values like liberty, equality, and rule of law to the digital realm, countering threats from AI and surveillance technologies.
Modern governance increasingly relies on automated processes for KYC, welfare distribution, and healthcare, often lacking transparency and individual consent.
The concentration of power in tech designers, law enforcement, and private companies can turn citizens into passive data subjects rather than active right-holders.
Surveillance has evolved into metadata gathering, location tracing, and biometric identification, potentially chilling free speech and disrupting democracies.
The Supreme Court's Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) case affirmed the right to privacy as a basic right, highlighting the need for stronger data protection.
Data-fication across sectors enhances efficiency but reduces personal control over information, with consent often becoming a routine "click-through" process.
Facial recognition technologies, used in public spaces, have faced restrictions due to concerns about racial discrimination, surveillance, and false identification.
Algorithmic failures can exclude deserving families from welfare schemes, and automated content moderation can silence legitimate voices, violating constitutional principles.
India's legal system, including the Information Technology Act, 2000, is seen as inadequate for defending citizen liberties and privacy in the digital age.
An independent digital rights commission is needed to inquire into violations and ensure accountability, along with stricter surveillance laws and algorithmic audits.
Digital literacy is crucial for empowering individuals to critique and challenge digital power structures, ensuring that technology serves the people.
Key Concepts Involved:
Digital Constitutionalism: The application of constitutional principles to protect rights and freedoms in the digital space.
Surveillance: The monitoring of behavior, activities, or information for the purpose of influence, management, protection, or direction.
Algorithms: A process or set of rules to be followed in calculations or other problem-solving operations, especially by a computer.