GS 2: PolityGS 2: GovernanceGS 3: Science & TechnologyPrelims

Draft SC rules prohibit use of AI for judicial outcomes, witness profiling, Pg14

Supreme Court committee proposes stringent AI regulations, banning AI for judicial outcomes and witness profiling, mandating human oversight to protect justice and prevent bias.

Practice MCQs

797 Students attempted
Attempt Now

Key Highlights:

  • The Supreme Court AI committee has proposed draft regulations for the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Indian courts, made public on June 3, 2026.
  • The draft prohibits AI from determining judicial outcomes, assisting in sentencing without human oversight, profiling parties or witnesses, and using opaque or unexplainable AI systems.
  • AI systems are mandated to function solely in an assistive capacity and remain subservient to human judgment.
  • The regulations allow AI for administrative functions like case management, scheduling, and translation, but explicitly bar its use for risk scoring (e.g., bail eligibility, recidivism prediction).
  • A full-time apex body is proposed at the Supreme Court to supervise AI adoption and policy development in the judiciary.
  • Public comments and suggestions on the draft are invited until June 20, 2026.

Detailed Insights:

  • The draft regulations, titled 'Regulations for Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Courts, 2026', aim to establish a framework for responsible AI adoption based on principles of human primacy, transparency, accountability, data protection, and judicial independence.
  • This initiative follows concerns raised by the Supreme Court regarding the growing reliance on AI, including an instance in March where a trial court used non-existent judgments generated by AI, leading to a rebuke for judicial misconduct.
  • The regulations emphasize a "human-in-the-loop" requirement, especially for applications involving higher risks to personal liberty or judicial integrity, ensuring human oversight and independent review.
  • Processing of personal data through AI systems will be governed by the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, and AI must not perpetuate bias based on constitutional grounds.
  • The draft also prohibits AI systems from surveillance or continuous monitoring of judicial officers, advocates, or litigants, unless specifically authorized by law.
  • Lawyers and litigants using AI tools for preparing pleadings or documents will be required to disclose the AI-assisted nature of such material at the time of filing.

Key Concepts Involved:

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI): Systems designed to perform tasks that typically require human intelligence, such as learning, problem-solving, and decision-making.
  • Human-in-the-loop (HITL): An approach where human intelligence is integrated into an AI workflow to ensure accuracy, safety, and ethical decision-making, especially in complex or high-stakes scenarios.
  • Opaque AI: AI systems whose internal processes and decision-making logic are difficult or impossible for humans to understand, interpret, or explain, often referred to as "black-box" models.
  • Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023: India's comprehensive legal framework for processing digital personal data, recognizing individuals' right to data protection and the need for lawful data processing.
SuperKalam
SuperKalam is your personal mentor for UPSC preparation, guiding you at every step of the exam journey.

Download the App

Get it on Google PlayDownload on the App Store
Follow us

ⓒ Snapstack Technologies Private Limited