GS 2: GovernanceGS 2: PolityPrelimsGS 2: Government policies and interventions for development in various sectorsGS 2: Indian Constitutional Evolution, Features, Amendments, Basic Structure Doctrine
MHA Draft On Ladakh Demands: Elected Body's Laws Need L-G Nod, Pg9
MHA's draft governance framework for Ladakh proposes elected body's laws require LG's assent, sparking major disagreement with local leaders over constitutional safeguards.
The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has drafted a governance framework for Ladakh, proposing an elected body whose laws would require the Lieutenant Governor (LG)'s assent.
The draft suggests granting constitutional status to a Union Territory (UT)-level elected body through a new Article 371K, with its functions provided via a Presidential regulation under Article 240.
Ladakh leaders, represented by the Apex Body Leh (ABL), have rejected the draft, stating it significantly deviates from earlier agreements for a body with "executive, financial and legislative powers" and constitutional safeguards.
Key points of contention include the LG's power to assent laws and remove members, the limited scope of law-making to "regulations," and the lack of protection against Central laws similar to Article 371A for Nagaland.
The draft was released by ABL chairman Chering Dorjay Lakrook amid public speculation and uncertainty in negotiations, with a scheduled meeting on October 22 failing to take place.
Detailed Insights:
The MHA draft proposes a "sui generis" (unique) model for Ladakh, aiming to create a UT-level body with constitutional status.
However, the draft limits the elected body's law-making authority to "regulations" on specific subjects, rather than granting full legislative competence over the State List.
The LG would have oversight powers, including the ability to remove elected members for reasons like conviction or conflict of interest.
Ladakh leaders had previously agreed with the MHA on establishing an elected body with "executive, financial and legislative powers" and constitutional safeguards through Article 371K.
A major disagreement exists over bureaucratic control; Ladakh seeks control over transfers, postings, and a separate cadre, while the MHA draft proposes a Chief Executive Secretary.
Ladakh representatives seek constitutional protection for subjects like land, natural resources, domicile, public employment, education, culture, and languages, requiring parliamentary consent for Central laws to apply.
This demand is inspired by Article 371A for Nagaland, which restricts the application of parliamentary acts on specific matters without the State Legislative Assembly's resolution.
The MHA draft explicitly states that Central laws would continue to apply to Ladakh, and the elected body's regulations would not affect the powers of Parliament or the Central Government.
The proposed Article 371K would require a constitutional amendment, while the body's composition and powers would be detailed through a Presidential regulation under Article 240.
Article 240 empowers the President to make regulations for certain Union Territories, which have the same force as Acts of Parliament.
Key Concepts Involved:
Union Territory (UT): An administrative division in India directly governed by the Union Government.
Lieutenant Governor (LG): The administrator of a Union Territory, appointed by the President of India.
Article 371K: A proposed constitutional provision to provide special governance arrangements and safeguards for Ladakh.
Article 240: Empowers the President to make regulations for the peace, progress, and good governance of certain Union Territories.
Article 371A: A special provision for Nagaland, protecting its religious, social practices, customary law, and land ownership from parliamentary acts without state assembly consent.