Advocates will no longer be promoted by points-based system as HC brings in new rules, Pg5
Delhi High Court implements new rules for senior advocate designation, replacing the controversial points-based system with full court consensus or two-thirds majority voting.
The Delhi High Court notified new rules on September 3 for the designation of senior advocates.
The new rules abolish the previous points-based evaluation system for designating senior advocates.
The Full Court will now decide on senior designations through consensus or a two-thirds majority vote.
This change follows a Supreme Court verdict in May 2025 that criticized the old evaluation process.
Detailed Insights:
The previous system involved a 100-point assessment by a Permanent Committee comprising the three senior-most judges.
Points were allocated based on criteria such as publications, years of practice, and an interview.
The old process faced controversy in 2024 after 302 applications were received, leading to a challenge before the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court observed that the 100-point assessment system "has not achieved the desired objectives".
Under the new rules, the Permanent Committee has been replaced by a Permanent Secretariat responsible for compiling candidate information.
The Permanent Secretariat will initiate the designation process at least once annually by inviting applications.
Key Concepts Involved:
Senior Advocate: A special designation conferred upon experienced lawyers by High Courts or the Supreme Court based on their ability and standing.
Full Court: Refers to all the judges of a High Court or the Supreme Court sitting together to decide on administrative or judicial matters.
Permanent Secretariat: A newly established administrative body within the High Court tasked with gathering and compiling data for senior advocate designations.
Supreme Court's May 2025 verdict: A significant ruling that mandated reforms in the process of designating senior advocates across High Courts.